I would be interested. What turbo are you speaking about?

I would be interested down the road.

Very interested... but like a few have stated already, that interest is years away lol.

Interested but i'd really like to see a roots sc kit!

I'm not a turbo expert but I've read enough car magazines over the last 20 years to know your company would make a great product. Yes, 6K could be spent initially by purchasing a SS, but we're talking about a 21st century sports car with a fantastic motor. 400HP at the wheels with this engine and your system? I'd certainly be interested if/when you market it.

The way I see it, even if the kit's price puts the V6 at the same price of the SS, it will still be better.

Only the 6M LS3 is putting numbers *near* the 400's in stock form (and it's mostly 350-380). But to reach it you will need a tune and some form of intake or exhaust mod (headers, catback) which further increases the price range. The 6A are sporting 310 to 335 (one member here even had a 295 for one of the runs which is really low; he's suffering from one of those "slow l99" problems, but still) I see nothing wrong with a V6 putting 400rwhp for the same price (even better if it's less).

It's a win-win situation! Off the boost it's the same mannered V6 (which is no slouch either!) with great MPG. On the boost, it will beat the SS (this is an assumption on my part...but higher HP, lower weight, and turbo’s are usually associated with gobs of torque). I’m thinking about a stage 3 cobalt SS turbocharged (Yes I know it's a 4 cyl, but it still making absurd HP/TQ for very little $$$ - more than an L99 and that's a LOT) and the past GNX and drooling at the results and potential in this V6.

Once you have the kit, further power upgrades are just about increasing the boost and fuel requirements (the bottom end is already forged no?) And this motor already has all the good goodies from the factory.

Only thing missing will be the suspension upgrades, but people interested in higher levels of power might just skip the SS drive train specs and go beyond. The only thing keeping me on this V6 vs V8 debate for which car I'll buy is that I really want to have the best of both worlds (and to me that's all the benefits of the 6 with the power of the 8) but there are no FI kits in the horizon yet (nor tuning) available. If there was I would buy the V6 in a heartbeat as I would know there will be upgrades for further modifications down the road.

Bottom line: Looks (the V6 looks better w/o the fake ram air sorry), more power, same luxury, and a better price? What's there not to like? If you make it, people will buy it. There will also be more V6 cars than V8 cars; which is always a good thing as there are more potential buyers!

I'd be interested, as long as it boosts fuel economy too. Efficiency is one of the big draws of the V6 Camaros - it's an edge that I wouldn't want to lose, especially with the switch to more expensive 93 octane fuel.

forced induction will require to something like 91 rather than the old 87. i fill up my cobalt with 93 every time. it wont break the bank

For near $6K and using 93 octane, not sure it would be real popular. A Nitrous kit for less than $1000 is already available and delivers as much as 100 more HP (as little as 50 as well).
One reason I chose the V6 was not to get locked into a 93 octane need at the pump each time. I may be a small portion of the V6 owners, but then again, may not.

Having said that, everyone wants to see as many options for the V6 as they can find, but from your perspective, not sure you'd get a worthy return on your investment.

I also don't see many mods like this being real popular as long as the cars are as new as they are - in warranty. A turbo would likely void any warranty.

One does not typically compare a turbo application with nitrous... completely different animals.

N2O is for those who want a dedicated condition of use (ie: on the drag strip). The power derived from it is not available at all times, nor is it feasable to try and make it so from a logistical standpoint.

Turbo's are for those who are looking for a much broader usage condition, such as daily driving, road courses, etc. etc. The cost for this power-on-demand is a much higher cost for all the mechanical and tuning bits required.

If weekend trips to the strip are all folks are doing, then get a nitrous kit and be done with it. N2O is great shit :)

Methanol injection solves this problem. Under vacuum conditions having the increased static octane of 93 is pretty much wasted. You could easily add a meth system in with progressive capabilities that are only inacted when the car is under (boost) load. Seeing how much turbo apps are going to be WOT pulls from time to time on the street, and at relativly low boost levels, this would be an excellent solution. Meth is cheap, reliable, and with the amount of electronics out now -- pretty much idiot proof.

Until we have knock numbers of 89 octane under progressive positive boost conditions (or how much the stock ECU will pull timing), it's hard to make that call.

I want to see folks find the limits of the stock transmissions before I even lay out an engine plan ;) Power means zip if you can't deliver it to the ground.

I am sure that $6000 will be the price for the kit not including the install. There are single turbo kits out for many cars (not including cheap cars like Honda, Eclipses, and other small cars) that are from 5000-8,000 for the kits alone.

I'd buy one. I bought the V6 for gas mileage, not because I couldn't afford the SS. This way I could have the best of both worlds.

Will the tranny handle 400 rwhp? Didn't I read somewhere that the limit was 375?

i would love to turbo for the v6

correct me if I am wrong and I usually am but they don't usually have roots style SC's for V-6's so Turbo is pretty much our only option????????????