0-60 predictions
mine is 4.40 secs
|
soo, is this ignoring the 4.8/4.6 est and saying what we think it should have been? cuz in that case a 4.4 was my original guess.
|
im gonna say 4.5 or 4.4
|
Quote:
camaro will be more arodinamic so 3860/860 = 4.48. lol im 100% sure thats not lagit but hey lol my post makes no sence. because i simply divided the heavier car into 4.7 and that = 860 but on a lighter car...... im a dumbass lol. |
LOL, Shank it sounds good to me!
|
Quote:
|
according to some calculator http://www.wallaceracing.com
i put the ss camaro weighs 3868 pounds has 422 horses shifts six times has 4.33 tire height and geared at a 3.45 it says 1/4 mile at 12.21 and 110 miles an hour at 3860 pounds for a ss manual at 422 hp it should run. 1/8 7.70 at 88.24 mph. i put it in the 0-60 calculator but it says 3.56 although id be happy with that i know the 0-60 is wrong a dif site says 4.41 |
actually the camaro is less aerodynamic...
I can't remember where it is but I think Scott said due to the front clip that drag coeficient was high. Edit: It wasn't scott. here's the post. FWIW http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showth...ient#post97903 |
Quote:
|
0-60 is nothing but a function of the driver's ability to launch. If you want to talk about how fast a car is you talk about the quarter mile, more specifically the trap speed. On T&T night at a local dragstrip I beat a stock (I assume) WRX by seven tenths, which is buslengths in a quarter mile race. That same car would be competitive if not faster than me if just measuring 0-60.
|
Quote:
|
G8 is 5.3 0-60 13.8 QM
According to Edmunds. |
^he was asking about the Drag Coefficient.
Did Edmunds show that? |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:54 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.