Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com

Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com (https://www.camaro5.com/forums/index.php)
-   Camaro V6 LFX Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons (https://www.camaro5.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=148)
-   -   2013 2ls gears (https://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=325297)

13lstuner 10-27-2013 09:13 PM

2013 2ls gears
 
From the research I have done I know this. I have 2.92 gears and to my knowledge the only gears I can put in my rear or better stated the
"Best" are the 3.55 gears. What amount of RWTQ could I expect to see from this change I'm gears. And also what amount of decrease in gas mileage? And excuse my ignorance but why does a higher gear ratio decrease gas milage? Will
It carry my shift points higher?

DSX_Camaro 10-27-2013 10:10 PM

Well, uh... Mathematically 3.55s would give you a 21.6% boost in torque compared to 2.92s... (3.55/2.92)

Gas mileage I'm not sure. That's a bit of a guessing game.

All due respect, I'm going to make this as simple as possible. Basically, the gear ratio is how many times the drive shaft rotates compared to how many times the axles rotate. So with 2.92s the axles rotate 2.92 times before the driveshaft rotates once.

As for cruising RPM, take your current cruising RPM at any given speed and multiply it by the torque multiplication of the gears over stock (so 1.216, or 1 + [3.55/2.92]). So what a speed once was at 2000 rpm is now at 2431 rpm.

DSX_Camaro 10-27-2013 10:12 PM

Forgive me but my post sounds so weird... need someone else to verify it. I'm very tired and don't want to be leading this fellow astray.

LStick 10-27-2013 10:19 PM

[QUOTE=DSX_Camaro;7133295]Well, uh... Mathematically 3.55s would give you a 21.6% boost in torque compared to 2.92s... (3.55/2.92)

Gas mileage I'm not sure. That's a bit of a guessing game.


Would make sense that a lower gear ratio (higher number numerically)would give you more torque off the line, and in the same token, at a given speed, your engine would be turning more RPMs in order to sustain that speed.

And that being the case, it will use a little more gas.

The LS and LT cars that are carrying the 3.27 rear ratio are rated at 28 MPG Hwy.
The 2LS with the 2.92 is rated at 30 MPG hwy. (mine gets a little more)
So it would make sense a 2LS running an even lower setup would get less MPGs.

13lstuner 10-27-2013 10:37 PM

Yeah I'm sure I will get less mpg. Thank you both for the information! And dang a 21% increase in torque would be... Amazing. Heck a 15% increase would be more than worth it to get the gears. My only question I have left is would this effect my powertrain warranty?

Jason@JacFab 10-27-2013 10:59 PM

I would venture to say that gas mileage in a high traffic, stop and go environment would be better, as the car does not have to work as hard to get moving from a stop... I imagine the only mpg loss would be on the hwy, however...

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showpo...4&postcount=11

Read from post 11 onward regarding fitment of the 3.55 gears in a 2ls rear.

13lstuner 10-27-2013 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RacnJsn95 (Post 7133446)
I would venture to say that gas mileage in a high traffic, stop and go environment would be better, as the car does not have to work as hard to get moving from a stop... I imagine the only mpg loss would be on the hwy, however...

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showpo...4&postcount=11

Read from post 11 onward regarding fitment of the 3.55 gears in a 2ls rear.


I completely trust your information but how does that happen? Not being able to put the 3.55 in mine? And what gear ratio does the stock ss have?

Jason@JacFab 10-27-2013 11:24 PM

Supposedly a different carrier (ie: 2 series carrier vs 3 series carrier)... Only one person has brought and tried the 3.55 gears in his 2ls and claimed they didn't fit the 2.92 carrier. Supposedly he contacted Richmond, the gear manufacturer and they werent even aware...

A manual SS has a 3.45 ratio, while the auto has the same ratio as the 1ls, and 1/2lt, a 3.27. Swapping to the SS 3.45 rear end would be like an 18% torque gain. Even swapping to someones take out 3.27 a6 v6 rear, a straight swap, would be appx a like 12% gain in tq.

lscamaro 10-27-2013 11:34 PM

Personally, and this is my opinion, is that the gear swap isn't worth it since you have to swap out the whole rear end pretty much and it's not going to cost you less than at least 1000 dollars. And if you're going to do it, I'd at least go with the 1LE gears which are the 3.91. They'd be a vast improvement but your MPG will take a hit.

Mr Monte 10-28-2013 12:58 AM

In my Wife's Mustang I replaced the 3.31 gears with 4.10 gears. City mpg got better by 5mpg & hwy only dropped 2mpg. Fun factor when up 100%.

Now I'm looking to install 3.91 gears in her Camaro. Unless you are mostly a hwy cruiser more gear is the biggest bang for the buck.

Even going from 3.73 gears to 4.10 gears in my Suburban made a big improvement in performance & I didn't loose any mpg city or hwy because it stayed in OD longer.

13lstuner 10-28-2013 03:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lscamaro (Post 7133521)
Personally, and this is my opinion, is that the gear swap isn't worth it since you have to swap out the whole rear end pretty much and it's not going to cost you less than at least 1000 dollars. And if you're going to do it, I'd at least go with the 1LE gears which are the 3.91. They'd be a vast improvement but your MPG will take a hit.

What process would I have to go through to get the 3.91 gears?

POWERFREAK 10-28-2013 05:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 13lstuner (Post 7133721)
What process would I have to go through to get the 3.91 gears?

In an LS, you will need to swap the diff to one from an SS or LT(M6) to be able to fit 3.91s (or just find a 1LE diff). You may also need to swap axles, hubs and the rear half of the driveshaft to get it to fit (they are required in an A6/V6).

13lstuner 10-28-2013 06:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by POWERFREAK (Post 7133768)
In an LS, you will need to swap the diff to one from an SS or LT(M6) to be able to fit 3.91s (or just find a 1LE diff). You may also need to swap axles, hubs and the rear half of the driveshaft to get it to fit (they are required in an A6/V6).

Would I have to have axles,hubs and driveshaft for the 3.45 ss manual swap?

Jason@JacFab 10-28-2013 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 13lstuner (Post 7133803)
Would I have to have axles,hubs and driveshaft for the 3.45 ss manual swap?

Yes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.