New Vs. Original: 2014 Camaro Z/28 vs. 1967 Z/28
3 Attachment(s)
Automobile crunched some numbers and put together a couple of photos between the 2014 Z/28 and the first Z/28, the 1967 Camaro Z/28.
Attachment 568683 Attachment 568681 Attachment 568682 |
Well I have a new desktop background :headbang:
side note - are the 2014 Z/28 power numbers actual or estimate? |
Cool! The 67' looks like a little toy in comparison. I've always loved the 1Gen, however now the 5Gen just blows it away (in looks and performance).
|
Quote:
|
Only problem with this photo comparison is they have a 1967 RS Rally Sport; not a Z/28.
|
Are you sure, in '67 the car was not identified anywhere that it is a Z/28.
|
Quote:
Edit: I think bowtie67 is correct, even the early '68 Z's didn't have Z/28 emblems. |
1 Attachment(s)
Love the new Z28 its sick but the price of it makes me chuckle. That's corvette type money. In Canada dealers will be looking to get 80k for this vehicle which imho insane.
Attachment 568703 |
...Maybe '67 Z/28s were non-RS cars....?????
|
Quote:
If I remember correctly, the '67 Z did not have any Z/28 or 302 badging. And the very early production '68 Z's only had "302" on the front fender. They didn't start applying the Z/28 emblems until Jan 68. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Here's a link with some interesting back-story: http://www.67z28.com/history.htm |
:thumbsup:The car in the photos is the 67 that GM owns and trotted out at Milford a few weeks ago. I'm pretty sure it's legit.The plate said "RARE Z" or something along those lines.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.