Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com

Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com (http://www.camaro5.com/forums/index.php)
-   Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons (http://www.camaro5.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=38)
-   -   EVERYBODY POST YOUR DYNO NUMBERS!(sticky request) (http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=153186)

KMPrenger 06-16-2011 01:09 PM

4 Attachment(s)
Updated 3/17/2013

When posting your results to this thread, please include the following information:

Type and make of dyno: (ex. dynojet model 248x, mustang, etc.)

ODO at the time of the dyno:
Temperature:
Manual/auto:
Gear used(3rd or 4th):
Modification:
Correction used(STD or SAE):
Result:


Results Below.....

Direct link to view this sheet online

https://spreadsheets.google.com/spre...Hc&output=html

Couple quick notes: It seems as though the powertrain loss for the manual is around 16% to possibly 17% while for the automatics, it is more in the 20% - 22% range. We have also noticed over time and through some testing that the V6s (more-so with headers it seems) tend to pick up false knock while on the dyno, thus pulling a few degrees more of timing versus what they are pulling under WOT on the street. If this is true, many of the results could possibly be making a bit more power than shown.

2010-2011 LLT STOCK DYNO
Attachment 306464

2010-2011 LLT MODDED DYNO (sorted with HP numbers low to high)
Sheet1:
Attachment 464720
Sheet2:
Attachment 464721
Sheet3:
Attachment 486631

2012 LFX MODDED/STOCK DYNO
View: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=233394


N2o/TURBO/SC LLT
View: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=115679


EDIT: Nov 16th
If you guys see your dyno number on the list and do not see a link next to your name then this mean that I do not have your actual dyno sheet or I can't find it. If you want to further verify your run then please pm me with the location of your dyno sheet.

When you post your dyno numbers try to post as much information as you can. The more information everyone see for your particular dyno run the better we can understand the result:) The standard information that should accompany with your dyno are as follows:

(Notes below originally written by member "bmorecam")

When we dyno our car there are 2 major component that most dyno use to calculate accurate result. They are the correction factor and temperature(weather station). There are over half of dozen corrections that can be used but here in USA we only use 2, the STD and SAE. Since there seem to be so much confusion surrounding this 2 calculations I will try to make this as simple as I can for you guys that want to know more about these very important factors that is part of every single dyno.

First, lets understand why these corrections was created in the first place. The correction standards were developed to discount the observed horsepower readings taken at different locations and weather conditions. It is obvious that an engine builder in Colorado could not produce as much horsepower as a shop at sea level. There is just less oxygen for the engine to burn at the higher altitude. What are less obvious are the other weather condition effects on the engine. So in order to compensate for this all advertised horsepower is "corrected" to several different industry standards.

SAE:
"SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers), USA. Power is corrected to reference conditions of 29.23 InHg of dry air and 77 F. This SAE standard requires a correction for friction torque.

STD:
STD is Another power correction standard determined by the SAE(society of automotive engineers). Power is corrected to reference conditions of 29.92 InHg of dry air and 60 F. Friction torque is handled in the same way as in the SAE standard."

To sum everything up, both correction factors basically mimic a preset condition which was created by the society of automotive engineers. So... although the SAE correction factor is recognized today as the "standard" correction in the automotive industry, this does not mean reading a dyno number with STD cf is wrong. No matter which correction factor your dyno shop use, you should get an accurate comparison as long as you compare SAE vs SAE and STD vs STD. Never compare a dyno run with two different type of correction.

Quote:

Originally Posted by partymn (Post 5271423)
I see some pretty good numbers from the V6 crowd, keep em coming.


bmorecam 06-16-2011 01:15 PM

Manual or Auto: manual

Mileage at the time of dyno: 5600

Type of dyno: dynojet 248x

Date/Time/Temp: 95*, 38% humidity

3rd/4th gear pull: 4th and 3rd

Modification at the time of dyno: updated trifecta tune, obx long tube with no cats, full exhaust

Dyno result: 264hp 240tq on 4th gear, and 270hp 236tq on 3rd gear


Mileage at the time of dyno: 6200

Type of dyno: dynojet 248x

Date/Time/Temp: 87*, 31% humidity

3rd/4th gear pull: 4th

Modification at the time of dyno: E85 trifecta tune, obx long tube with no cats, full exhaust

Dyno result: 284HP 244TQ on 4th gear

GoPaul 06-16-2011 01:30 PM

Manual or Auto: manual

Mileage at the time of dyno: ~7000
Type of dyno: dynojet

Date/Time/Temp: 87.7*, 26% humidity

3rd/4th gear pull: 4th

Modification at the time of dyno: Injen Powerflo CAI

Dyno result: 257hp 237tq

Hope to get an update soon now that the Trifecta tune, Vararam & MRT v2 are all installed.

KMPrenger 06-16-2011 02:00 PM

Nice...but there is an existing V6 dyno thread here.

It just always gets lost because it was never stickied...

EDIT:

Looks like its been tried 3 times already:

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=44635

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=57377

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=97831

bmorecam 06-16-2011 02:19 PM

Lets start over and sticky it this time so it wont get lost:thumbsup: Dyno numbers can be very informative. We are the only ones that dont have it up top "sticky"


come on mods..:chevy:

TJ91 06-16-2011 02:26 PM

this needs to be sticky'd asap, ill bump the $*** out of this thread until it does lol

BlkThndr66 06-16-2011 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TJ91 (Post 3347290)
this needs to be sticky'd asap, ill bump the $*** out of this thread until it does lol

:bump:
:sm0:

TJ91 06-16-2011 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlkThndr66 (Post 3347592)
:bump:
:sm0:

:sm0: were going to need some serious clean up in this thread by the time it ever gets stickied :laugh::drinking:

bmorecam 06-16-2011 03:40 PM

as long as it get stickied I will clean the house up really good:thumbsup: Maybe we can set it up the same way how the v6 1/4 mile thread is setup. Everybody post, and I or whoever can take the job to edit everything and post in the 1st top post. Im not too crazy to be the one to take care of the dyno thread but I will do it if I have to.

KMPrenger 06-16-2011 11:35 PM

Just need to combine this thread with one or two of the others...sticky it, and good to go...

Cept I do like the idea of the original post being able to be updated so that we can easily see numbers at a glance. Looking down through post after post takes time that most people just won't do. They will look at the first few and just assume those are the numbers...when in reality we are now getting bigger numbers than ever (thanks to the Vararam, new tune, and E85 tune)

bmorecam 06-17-2011 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KMPrenger (Post 3349665)
Just need to combine this thread with one or two of the others...sticky it, and good to go...

Cept I do like the idea of the original post being able to be updated so that we can easily see numbers at a glance. Looking down through post after post takes time that most people just won't do. They will look at the first few and just assume those are the numbers...when in reality we are now getting bigger numbers than ever (thanks to the Vararam, new tune, and E85 tune)

Already thought of that and already started;) I will continue working on putting everyone's dyno together today.

If you never posted your dyno numbers in the older "post your dyno" threads than please do.. so I can make sure that I have your dyno numbers.:chevy:

Blade 06-17-2011 09:26 AM

I sent a PM to 2 of the mods requesting a sticky for this thread.

bmorecam 06-17-2011 09:36 AM

thank you blade;) hopefully we wont lose this thread this time. I cant belive this was not in the sticky by others before.

KMPrenger 06-17-2011 10:48 AM

:respekt: bmorecam!!

Oh, and you might want to change the "E95" tune to "E85" lol.

bmorecam 06-17-2011 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KMPrenger (Post 3350869)
:respekt: bmorecam!!

Oh, and you might want to change the "E95" tune to "E85" lol.

Oh.. crap:facepalm: thank you prenger.. will have to fix that asap:D

SDCamaro10 06-18-2011 01:02 AM

:bump:

PercyJWellingtonIII 06-18-2011 10:25 AM

450 rw hp? :iono:....stock.

Blade 06-18-2011 07:36 PM

Manual or Auto: Automatic

Mileage at the time of dyno: 20,500 approx

3rd/4th gear pull: 3rd

Type of dyno and Model: Dynojet

Date/Time/Temp: 5/16/2011/5:59 PM/HUMID (Can't remember lol, but HUMID)

Modification at the time of dyno: See sig

Dyno result: 262 RHP & 247 RTQ

Done at Precision Dyno, N. Belmont, NC 980-522-0839

bmorecam 06-18-2011 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blade (Post 3356300)
Manual or Auto: Automatic

Mileage at the time of dyno: 20,500 approx

3rd/4th gear pull: 3rd

Type of dyno and Model: Dynojet

Date/Time/Temp: 5/16/2011/5:59 PM/HUMID (Can't remember lol, but HUMID)

Modification at the time of dyno: See sig

Dyno result: 262 RHP & 247 RTQ

Done at Precision Dyno, N. Belmont, NC 980-522-0839

Almost as same as my number. I dynoed 270 on 3rd gear, and 264 on 4th gear with vince's newest tune, long tube headers and exhaust. If I had an auto my 3rd gear run probably would of been very close to yours.

It seem more of us actually dyno lower than there are peoples that dyno high on dynojet. Your dyno number is just another indication that our stock car would have dynoed in around 230-240.

Your place wouldn't happen to have dynojet model 248x now would it??

Blade 06-18-2011 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmorecam (Post 3356642)
Almost as same as my number. I dynoed 270 on 3rd gear, and 264 on 4th gear with vince's newest tune, long tube headers and exhaust. If I had an auto my 3rd gear run probably would of been very close to yours.

It seem more of us actually dyno lower than there are peoples that dyno high on dynojet. Your dyno number is just another indication that our stock car would have dynoed in around 230-240.

Your place wouldn't happen to have dynojet model 248x now would it??

No idea......but it's in ground if that helps.

bmorecam 06-18-2011 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blade (Post 3356739)
No idea......but it's in ground if that helps.

I bet your shop have the 248. Almost everybody that dyno low seem to be from dynojet 248 model.

Even the SS(L99) guys that dyno low 295-310 stock seem to be from the 248 model.

Most shops now use the 224 and 424 on the ground dyno.

Thank you for posting blade.:thumbsup:

PoorMansCamaro 06-27-2011 08:11 PM

Here's a pic from my most recent dyno. Doesn't show TQ, which sucks, but better then nothing, I guess. Probably won't do another until summer is over.

I drive a manual. About 15000 miles at the time of the dyno and 85 degrees outside. This pic shows 270hp with a base run without nitrous, and 324hp with a 55shot. List of mods are in my sig.

Oh, and 4th gear pull.

http://tapatalk.com/mu/a6cd0a25-1bf8-0db6.jpg

KMPrenger 06-27-2011 10:13 PM

bmorecam...if its too much trouble don't worry about it..but If you can sort the results into stock and modified sections, and then within those, list the highest HP ones first, and then on down from there.

I think that would make it very easy to read.

Just my thoughts! Good stuff here.

bmorecam 06-27-2011 10:17 PM

will do prenger:thumbsup:

KMPrenger 06-27-2011 10:18 PM

dang...you responded fast.

You must be on here as much as me...maybe. lol j/k.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.