Originally Posted by lil_chef
it was a 2LT because they said it had leather seats.
i think the hyundai they tested was closer to the price of the SS than the price of the 2lt...........even then the Lt was extremely close in time.
are magazines just reusing the times they achieved the first time? if so thats hardly fair
Thanks. I guess I missed that part. And when edmunds does these quick tests, they 'bench race' like we do so they're old numbers, different tracks, different days, different conditions. But it makes quick comparisons easier.