Thread: Gaming PC
View Single Post
Old 04-01-2013, 06:25 PM   #65
Gigachip's Avatar
Drives: Depends on game
Join Date: May 2010
Location: My Computer
Posts: 10,265
Send a message via AIM to Gigachip
Originally Posted by Ice992 View Post
Actually........ the 670 (particularly the 4gb) typically only benchmarks 4-5% slower than a 680. Is an extra 5% (even 6%) worth an extra $130 price jump? Hardly.
thats what I'm saying
Though I don't have a 680 to compare my 670 to.
I've ran it on my PC (3770k OC'd 4.5ghz) in sli vs the 7970 in xfire as well
below are just 2 of my benchmarks I've ran.

Galaxy reference 670s
GTX 670s SLI

Visiontek reference 7970s(bios flashed to Ghz Editions)
Radeon HD 7970 xfire

for solos I ended up only doing the AMD card solo on my intel pc :( I ran the 670 solo on my fx cpu
2011 Camaro RJT 2SS/RS - Mods: Cold Air Inductions(CAI) Intake, TSP Long Tube Headers w/high flow cats + Magnaflow Catback, Jannetty Racing Tune
2003 4.8L Silverado White 2WD Ext. Cab - Mods: Intake(self made), BBK Throttle Body, Pacesetter Shorty Headers, Magnaflow Catback, Cam(forgot specs), tune (forgot company)
2012 Raptor Black SCAB - Mods: Throttle Body Spacer (lol wut?) <--actually only thing my wife agreed to because of $40. Taking full advantage whether or not any performance increase

Last edited by Gigachip; 04-01-2013 at 06:39 PM.
Gigachip is offline   Reply With Quote