|
It's one thing to reference that thread for what it was.
But to reference it as a cumulative list of regularly occurring issues is irresponsible at best.
All writers of those articles had to do was say something to the effect of, "be aware, most of these issues are single occurances and shouldn't be counted as ongoing issues."
Then we'd have probably been able to leave it. But the spin that the list was regularly occurring problems was an awful bit of reporting.
|