DerScotsman...that would've helped a bit in the beginning.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chevyforlife
i mean theres nothing wrong with four cylinders but i think it should be for the cobalts. i think that a a v-6 is fast and i have proof. my mom drives a 2002 pontiac grand am gt and it would smoke almost any v-8 car in town. so i dont have a problem with it, its just that change is good but i hate change. i hope ppl see the way i see things.
|
There's nothing in there about the 4 cyllinder
replacing the V6...not the way I read it. But rather, to add the 4 to the lineup.
And all this Cobalt talk...Seriously, come on.
The turbo Cobalt will probably still beat the ~260 horse V6 Camaro...so I don't see the point in that argument..........
Quote:
Originally Posted by smokn'
i'm also kinda upset that gm just pretty much dropped the whole "we will be competitive to mustang prices." i just hope it's not too much.
|
He didn't completely drop it. He said it will be more, and that's nothing new. If you're thinking thousands more...your insane (and if that's the truth...well, so's GM.) But ~$1000 more for an EXTREMELY superior car. That's not unreasonable to me.