View Single Post
Old 01-25-2009, 10:16 PM   #13
UCF w00t
Geek
 
UCF w00t's Avatar
 
Drives: IOM 2010 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Orlando
Posts: 4,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by LSxJunkie View Post
No they didn't. VE suspension is VE suspension. The nature of the IRS is to hop. You can work around it, but GXPs hop, CTS-Vs hop, ZR1s hop, and the Camaro will hop.

And I maintain that, bone stock, LS3 Camaros will be running around 12.80s at BEST.
"VE suspension"?

And this is from a CTS-V review...
Quote:
A smooth, powerful motor and solid, quick-shifting transmissions certainly get the bulk of the credit for the impressive performance. But the asymmetrical half-shafts (one is larger in diameter) help quell the rear suspension's tendency toward hop during a fast launch. In fact, it is as hard to generate axle hop on this version of the CTS-V as it was easy to generate it on the previous generation.
When I said "fixed" (notice the quotes in the original as well) I wasn't saying that it is 100% eliminated as noone has been able to do that but it is greatly reduced. Reviewers complained about the hop in the GXP but the Camaro has the same improvements that are in place in the CTS-V and ZR1 to achieve much smoother launches.

And here's a video showing a ZR1 launch (don't see any hop)
UCF w00t is offline   Reply With Quote