Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com - View Single Post

hapisok · 10-01-2012, 01:26 PM

from what they show on summit...it is a different style MAF. haven't seen a pic of the actual MAF...just what is depicted on the website.

i don't see it as the MAF size as being the reason for the gains. if it were to be slimmer, smaller, sleeker...have a better aerodynamic profile, then it should provide gains. because i haven't tested one first hand or seen actual results as most people here, then who's certified to say "its a waste of money"?

if a MAF works like its supposed to, then why is there now a stronger OEM MAF? the original worked the way it was designed, correct? who's to say that the new OEM MAF can't be improved upon? i don't know all the technicals behind it, programming, or the how fast can it read before its too fast to be usable data? but whats it going to hurt to try it out and provide feedback? legit feedback, positive or negative is better than speculation or perpetuating internet rhetoric without facts.

10-01-2012, 01:26 PM	#12
hapisok crazier than a coconut Drives: 2010 2SS/RS LS3 Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: virginia Posts: 1,547	from what they show on summit...it is a different style MAF. haven't seen a pic of the actual MAF...just what is depicted on the website. i don't see it as the MAF size as being the reason for the gains. if it were to be slimmer, smaller, sleeker...have a better aerodynamic profile, then it should provide gains. because i haven't tested one first hand or seen actual results as most people here, then who's certified to say "its a waste of money"? if a MAF works like its supposed to, then why is there now a stronger OEM MAF? the original worked the way it was designed, correct? who's to say that the new OEM MAF can't be improved upon? i don't know all the technicals behind it, programming, or the how fast can it read before its too fast to be usable data? but whats it going to hurt to try it out and provide feedback? legit feedback, positive or negative is better than speculation or perpetuating internet rhetoric without facts. __________________ Last edited by hapisok; 10-01-2012 at 01:37 PM.