Thread: Less powerful V6 and I-4 still considered according to R&T
View Single Post
Old 02-27-2009, 09:06 PM   #13
CamaroSpike23
Truth Enforcer
 
CamaroSpike23's Avatar
 
Drives: anything I can get my hands on
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: anywhere and everywhere
Posts: 22,797
Send a message via Yahoo to CamaroSpike23
Quote:
Originally Posted by SSOOCH View Post
I don't see why so many people are opposed to the Ecotec I-4 Turbo Charged. It's a hot little motor. It's what's in my 08 HHR SS and that is one fun little car. It's the same powerplant that's also in the Cobalt SS. Chevy Cobalt set the Production FWD record on the Nurburgring Ring in Germany at 8:22. Old record holder was Mazdaspeed3 at 8:39. This took place in October 2008. If you're opposed to an I-4 in a Camaro, then you should be opposed to a V6 in a Camaro.
thats wrong.

ever hear of the Iron Duke?


the I-4 was tested in the camaro. and performed worse than the LLT, by a large bit. which is why GM axed it from being a possibility in the Camaro. the motor is great, but I dont want one in the Camaro and neither does GM.
__________________
Never race anything you can't afford to light on fire and push off a cliff
A group as a whole tends to be smarter than the smartest person in that group until one jackass convinces everyone otherwise.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BowtieGuy View Post
Nobody makes CamaroSpike happy. You just disgust him a little less than other people.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WheelmanSS View Post
Post count is truly an accurate measure of how cool someone is on the Internet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Norris View Post
I piss excellence
and fart awesomeness
"You can think I'm wrong, but that's no reason to quit thinking.”
Quote:
Originally Posted by Overflow View Post
But not all people were born awesome like you, Spike.
CamaroSpike23 is offline   Reply With Quote