Quote:
Originally Posted by scrming
I'm not worried about the first run if it doesn't run as well as expected as long as some one steps up to the plate and gives straight answers as to why... not some BS run-around....
As I mentioned Rich lives not to far away from me... going to to my absolute best to get out to the track when he's ready...
I know you believe the STS system works.... I would love for it to work! But for the one track outing it had, it didn't work and we never got a satisfactory answer why it didn't....
|
Ok, I know we will see good numbers. I agree, the AACS run was a fail. I spoke to AACS and clearly, they are not tuners (but they make great lighting stuff). I'm just surprised that you don't think the kit works. It's like all those that say Trifecta can't tune the V-6.
BONE STOCK
1
nhra stocker LS3 3/7/2010 1.972 8.195 @ 88.58 MPH 12.58 @ 110.30 MPH
263
Internal Engine Mods plus Bolt-Ons (e.g. bolt-ons plus heads and/or cam)
12.
ColdCamaroSS - 12.97 @ 115.55 mph, (Cam, LT, Exhaust, CAI, Tune, (LS3, M6) # 517
Power Adders (Nitrous, Turbo, Supercharger)
30.
Rickerbucks - 12.20 @ 120.59 mph, (Supercharger/2300, Cam, LT, CAI), (LS3, M6), # 488
My point is 1/4 time are very indicative of performance but should not be the reason if a certain mod works or doesn't. I know there are FI V-8's that have run slower than NHRA's stock run of 12.58. Look at those MPH's at the trap for Riverbucks! Too many other variables.
By the way, I'll be posting up soon on some of the additional mods and changes. I personally want to acheive at least 400 rwhp. I just don't have access to a track to prove that my car works.