Quote:
Originally Posted by FISHTAIL
Go online and check the 0-60 specs on the 2004 S2000 it's about 4 second slower than the Camaro and the 2009 is about 1 second slower. I checked it a few weeks ago because my brother in-law has one and I wanted to know where I stood. This guy said that he had some exhaust work done for a gain of 20 extra HP. In my opinion and with the facts presented I think a Camaro LT can take a stock S2000
"Fortunately, the S2000 now accelerates quicker. It pulls to 100 mph in 15.10 seconds, which is 0.2 seconds quicker than before. And there's also an improvement in roll-on acceleration, the kind of performance you feel on the street, because it accelerates 0.18 seconds quicker to 70 mph from 50 mph. Before the clutch went, we also measured a 0-to-60-mph time of 6.4 seconds and a quarter-mile run of 14.4 seconds at 97.2 mph, which are also quicker." Quote taken from http://www.modified.com/roadtests/04...000/index.html
 |
I agree... but ryan said his opponents where anything but stock. A S2000 is like 1K lbs lighter and if it was modded out it should a LT a decent fight.