Quote:
Originally Posted by fierodeletre
I dunno man, wasn't an LS1 car mid to high 13s stock? Didn't it have more horsepower, less weight and have a substantial surfeit in torque than the '10 LT? Don't get me wrong I'd love to see a sub 6 second, sub 14 second V6 camaro since that's what I'm buying no matter what, but I think it's safer to hope for a 5.9-6.0 and a 14.2-14.4. It's still gotta get 27 mpg.
|
The 4th gen LS1 was a low 13 high 12 car. 13.4 avg driver/
__________________
If you believe it is your right to speak freely no matter the content, relevance, or intelligence of statement, then it is my duty to the powers that be to set you straight.
People have to talk about something just to keep their voice boxes in working order. So they'll have good voice boxes in case there's ever anything really meaningful to say.
Kurt Vonnegut
|