Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-11-2008, 11:48 AM   #15
Congoman775

 
Congoman775's Avatar
 
Drives: Muscle
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by chevydude26 View Post
I kid you not...its like we are being run by commies...

carmakers will react to the market if the market is demanding higher mpg cars...government shouldn't force certain guidelines since they have never built a car not know how to build one...

and i won't get into the unions but detroit is paying more for their retired workers than their current labor force...thats just backwards thinking and the contract with the union was probably done by ceo's who knew they were going to retire and wouldn't have to deal with that problem in the future
maybe they should stop handing out pensions if they dont plan on paying them
Congoman775 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2008, 04:27 PM   #16
chevydude26

 
chevydude26's Avatar
 
Drives: Future 2011 camaro convertible
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by Design1stCode2nd View Post
The downfall of Detroit auto makers is a combination of things; only one small part is regulation. Most of Detroitís problems are of their own making. Years of poor quality, putting all your eggs in one basket (high margin SUVís) agreeing to bad contracts with the UAW, and making too many brands that compete directly with each other.

Why is it that everyone else can succeed in North America except GM, Ford and Chrysler? They all have to follow the same regulations. This is why the $50 billion buyout that the once big 3 are asking for pisses me off to no end. If you canít run your business properly you file for bankruptcy and try again. Now I do think legislators could make some changes allowing GM to close dealerships they donít need anymore or close brands without as much cost. Other than Chevrolet and Cadillac what else does GM really need? Buick is worthless as is Pontiac. They have maybe two cars between the brands that are worth anything. GMC is just rebadged Chevyís. Saab? Worthless. Saturn? Competes directly with Chevy. Hummer? Its already dead.
the uaw situation plays a huge part...and that is something that toyota and lexus don't have
__________________
I think i flip flopped on the ss bumper...it looks good man...it really does
chevydude26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2008, 05:47 AM   #17
Cessna510
Gm loyalist
 
Cessna510's Avatar
 
Drives: 04 z71 tahoe\99 SS m6
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Baxter Springs Ks
Posts: 362
There has to be some personal responsibility...I bought my tahoe and it was my decision alone(great vehicle) If I want a BAD BOY v\8 from the factory it should be my right to have it. I'm tired of paying insane taxes on each check only to see my government go deeper into the red and take away my choices.I wish we had a true candidate for CHANGE instead of a run of the mill politician that has the media in his pocket.
__________________
Cessna510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2008, 11:14 AM   #18
Design1stCode2nd
 
Drives: four wheels
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: usa
Posts: 585
Quote:
Originally Posted by B2E2RUN View Post

It is NOT a bailout. it is a loan to "jumpstart" future energy efficient (read: CAFE standards) products.
A rose by another name...

If we want to help the big 3 re-evaluate franchise laws. Allow them to close dealers and brands if need be. Provide incentives to tax payers who buy fuel efficient cars like the volt (for any automaker).

Things like the UAW contracts and pensions/healthcare we agreed upon by the then management, they need to be held accountable. Why should our money be given to them for their mistakes? GM has also absolved themselves of the healthcare benefits of retirees with the UAW VEBA put in place. They are now competitive with the transplants give or take.

If your company is losing billions after billions then why is your CEO and they rest of the brass still in charge?

At least Bill Ford had the foresight to see he wasn't the man to get the job done and the desire to better the company. Ford is now in a race, will they be able to make the change to a profitable company before they run out of money. They are mortgaged to the hilt and itís an all of nothing gamble I wish them the best.

I firmly believe that there will not be a Chrysler as we know it in the next two years. GM has a chance but its close. If we have a big uptick in the economy in a year or two and if the Volt and similar do everything itís supposed to and more they might just make it.
Design1stCode2nd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2008, 11:30 AM   #19
The_Blur
Rock Chalk
 
The_Blur's Avatar
 
Drives: Demon Super Sport
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,687
Send a message via AIM to The_Blur
A lot of people seem to be concerned that there won't be V8s from the factory, or that such V8s will be impotent.

If you want a powerful V8, you can get one. CAFE is just guiding the majority of cars produced by a company. The market already shows that most people don't care about having that much power. If anything, CAFE somewhat follows the market. Future regulations guided by CAFE are certainly more extreme than they should be, but the current ones aren't that tough at all.

As the default devil's advocate, I tend to find myself arguing for CAFE laws. I don't think they're the worst thing that's happened to the auto industry, but they certainly aren't the best. If you want lots of power, you can still buy a Camaro or a Corvette, but most buyers really don't want that. Of the cars that GM produces, there are a lot of great small cars with small engines and a few great cars with great engines. In between, you've got some fat that can be cut, like the weak Monte Carlo or excessive truck production. CAFE will force GM to be a leaner company that builds what people buy. That means that enthusiasts like us will still get our share in the performance market while soccer moms can still buy slow sedans and crossovers. The only real changes that CAFE is forcing automakers like GM to make are going to be visible on car lots. There won't be as many Colorados as Cobalts. I don't think that's such a horrible thing.

I don't care for the threat of CAFE eliminating great American V8s, but I strongly doubt that the V8 will be going away any time soon. Keep the faith.
The_Blur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2008, 06:11 PM   #20
chevydude26

 
chevydude26's Avatar
 
Drives: Future 2011 camaro convertible
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Blur View Post
A lot of people seem to be concerned that there won't be V8s from the factory, or that such V8s will be impotent.

If you want a powerful V8, you can get one. CAFE is just guiding the majority of cars produced by a company. The market already shows that most people don't care about having that much power. If anything, CAFE somewhat follows the market. Future regulations guided by CAFE are certainly more extreme than they should be, but the current ones aren't that tough at all.

As the default devil's advocate, I tend to find myself arguing for CAFE laws. I don't think they're the worst thing that's happened to the auto industry, but they certainly aren't the best. If you want lots of power, you can still buy a Camaro or a Corvette, but most buyers really don't want that. Of the cars that GM produces, there are a lot of great small cars with small engines and a few great cars with great engines. In between, you've got some fat that can be cut, like the weak Monte Carlo or excessive truck production. CAFE will force GM to be a leaner company that builds what people buy. That means that enthusiasts like us will still get our share in the performance market while soccer moms can still buy slow sedans and crossovers. The only real changes that CAFE is forcing automakers like GM to make are going to be visible on car lots. There won't be as many Colorados as Cobalts. I don't think that's such a horrible thing.

I don't care for the threat of CAFE eliminating great American V8s, but I strongly doubt that the V8 will be going away any time soon. Keep the faith.
sorry my friend but the government has no business trying to guess the market...leave that to the free market...

if you don't think that government controlling the output of a company is a bad thing perhaps you might like a place called cuba ...or 1980's soviet union...

government doesn't know how to build cars...you just don't force a company to be leaner the market itself will do that if trucks aren't selling...
__________________
I think i flip flopped on the ss bumper...it looks good man...it really does
chevydude26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2008, 07:12 PM   #21
fastball
White 'n Nerdy
 
Drives: 2009 Accord EX-L V6 coupe 6 speed
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,611
At the risk of getting flamed here, I think it was GM's own fault for miserable quality in the 70s and 80s, and I don't blame CAFE one bit - even though I completely disagree with it and I do think CAFE is a joke.

It's not CAFE that made Honda and Toyota make a profit on small cars, they made small cars all their life long before anyone even heard of CAFE..... and GM had done nothing but make land barges.

It's all either company knew how to do well. It was in the DNA of the companies long before it was in the wrong hands of Washington.

But I have a problem letting GM off the hook that easily. Even Bob Lutz today readily admits that the creation of the 1983 Cimaron was the lowest of the lowest points for GM, and that kind of thinking back then (or lack thereof) by the powers that be contribute in no small part to a great deal of people's perception of the company today.

If GM was so handcuffed by the UAW contracts 30 years ago, it's their own fault for caving in to them and letting the floor sweepers make thirty bucks an hour.

The NFL is the most profitable and lucrative of all the major sports today, and they play 1/10th the number of games played in a MLB season. Because it has salary caps and equal profit sharing among the teams. You don't end up with the Angels, Yankees, or Red Sox ability to sign anyone they want for $30 million/year and the KC Royals, Pittsburgh Pirates, and Cleveland Indians forced to find other ways once their stars become too good to keep. Hence, the quality of their teams suffer.

Fair or unfair, that's the truth of the matter.
fastball is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2008, 11:00 AM   #22
smokn'
 
Drives: Banana boat
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The carribeen
Posts: 228
straight up, our government is attempting to destroy our economy, cause another great depression, and probably make us susceptible to take over by another country. I really see no other goal for cafe except to murder detroit, like the article says, and in turn remove american jobs and increase japanese jobs. it might help it in the long run, but right now it is further implying the already prevalent stigma that american cars don't get good mpg (chevy has more 30+ mpg cars than honda or toyota). on top of that, the govt. is driving up gas prices w/ taxes and letting the oil companies run rampart w/ their profits which further puts out domestic auto makers.

this reminds me of a physics teacher i once had who tried to convince the class that american cars were crap and we shouldn't buy them. i constantly countered her and assured her that she was destroying our economy and killing our future. people like that infuriate me. forgive me, i digress.

anyway, i just want to see the expressions on the traitors of congressmen's faces 10 years from now when our country has gone under due to the stupid decisions that were probably made for under the table profits. please forgive my ranting, i'm done now
smokn' is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2008, 02:33 PM   #23
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 23,221
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Think of it this way, if the automakers were allowed to sell anything they want for the last 25 years, they would have been offering more powerful and less efficient vehicles. While that would have secured more money for them, this past year would have been even worse for them.

As for the unions, they have outlived their usefulness. But when GM made the agreements with them, things were going pretty good for them. They could allow for generous concessions. At the time the Big 3 dominated the market and imports were all actually imported. Plus, nobody was really expecting retirees to live into their 80's.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Great article on the Camaro concept being used in Transformers movie Tran 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 14 02-25-2010 01:48 PM
Detroit News panel wants GM to build Camaro concept Tran 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 12 03-15-2009 04:38 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.