Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
SMGSS
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons

Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-17-2008, 09:41 PM   #176
carsismeZ06
Corvette and Camaro lover
 
carsismeZ06's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro...some day...
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 965
I personally think it looks better than the SS.
__________________
carsismeZ06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2008, 08:20 AM   #177
kmdrum79
 
Drives: 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee Overland
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 85
I have a question. I currently have a 2006 Pontiac G6 with the 3.9L, 240hp engine. Do you think the V6 will feel much different than it? What about the V8? Is the horsepower increase noticable when you initially accelerate or when you decide to stomp on the accelerator when you see a Mustang on the freeway and want to leave it in the dust?
kmdrum79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2008, 07:40 PM   #178
RealQuickCamaro
 
Drives: Yellow
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by kmdrum79 View Post
I have a question. I currently have a 2006 Pontiac G6 with the 3.9L, 240hp engine. Do you think the V6 will feel much different than it? What about the V8? Is the horsepower increase noticable when you initially accelerate or when you decide to stomp on the accelerator when you see a Mustang on the freeway and want to leave it in the dust?
Yes you will notice a noticable differerence because it has 60 more horsepower along with 42 more tq. the transmission is better and geared better. u will notice also a difference in fuel g6 is rated at Hwy: 9.8 L/100 km and the camaro is under 9.0km per 100 km, the camaro only weighs 228 pounds more than the g6
RealQuickCamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2008, 02:13 PM   #179
Brokinarrow


 
Brokinarrow's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Honda NC700x
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Indianola, IA
Posts: 5,341
For me, the V6 is looking better and better. The only thing I was iffy on was the sound of it, love the sound of the SS and I was worried the V6 wouldn't sound anywhere near as impressive. The video with Jay Leno revving the engine on his kinda helps, but I need to hear it in person first. Still though, 300 HP is more than enough to have fun with
__________________
Brokinarrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2008, 02:43 AM   #180
MAROobsession
 
MAROobsession's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Honda Accord V6
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Palm Beach FL
Posts: 87
Im sort of in that same position as u with a g6 having a 2005 honda accord with the same amount of power, despite a few minor mods. Im sure u feel a good difference between our cars with the v6... RWD helps alot.

It's funny theres a thread that was going back and forth on the forum i used to go on regularly for my accord. It was talking about the v6 honda and other cars in its class with 250hp+ and whats the best value for the money. I throw in the fact that the V6 Camaro will be the best bang for the buck car starting at 23k with 300hp n thread goes dead for the past five days now... haha. It's true it going to be such a great car for the money.
__________________
Dodge builds challengers, Chevy builds champions
MAROobsession is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2008, 02:56 AM   #181
dsatch
 
Drives: 2001Buick LeSabre
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Portland
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by EllwynX View Post
I've never had a negative opinion of V6 Camaro's. I've owned 2 V6's ('91 RS and '02 Coupe) and loved them both.

But I've been saying all along that I wanted the V8 this time around.

I haven't owned a V8 since my first car ('82 Berlinetta) 16 years ago. So I think it's time to get back to where I started. lol That, and I need to overcompensate after driving around in a 103hp Aveo for 4 years prior to getting the new Camaro.

WELL said bro, I am gonna go for the rs/ss and i dont care if i go to the grave broke from the gas bills
dsatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2008, 05:13 PM   #182
camarofanatic
 
camarofanatic's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 camaro
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 267
at first i was wanting the ss but when i heard the V6 has 300hp and better gas mileage cnt really go wrong with that...i did take into consideraiton that i drive 60miles to my college campus a day up hill down hill traffic...heavy traffic and sometimes wide open Route 208 on those days i get out early but i ended up going with the 2lt rs it will be alot easier on my wallet and still be able to have 300 horses under my foot cant complain...i also think when people see the v6 perform in real life not in front of the computer screen i think it will change there preception...
camarofanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 02:56 PM   #183
Flighttester
 
Drives: 2008 Audi A4 3.2 MT S Line
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 53
One reason I don't own a C6 Corvette coupe today is because I just can't justify having and feeding a 400+ horsepower engine in a road car (those runflat tires (with no spare) turn me off too) and the fact the Camaro is being offered with a truely sophisticated DOHC V-6 with direct injection is really the only reason I would even consider the Camaro. I'm wanting a decent road car and 300 horses is plenty, even though the car is a little portly in the gross weight department.

I hope the whole car looks and drives as good as it appears. If it does, I just might be enticed to own a GM car again for the first time in decades.

I've heard that the Caddy CTS with the manual gearbox feels kinda' sloppy in that car. I've never even seen a CTS manual except at a car show.

Wonder if the Camaro (which apparently uses essentialy the same hardware) has the same complaint?

It's gotta have a decent manual gearbox inside or it won't be fit for my garage.
Flighttester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 02:59 PM   #184
Mr. Wyndham
I used to be Dragoneye...
 
Mr. Wyndham's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 Camaro 1LE
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 25,786
Send a message via AIM to Mr. Wyndham
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flighttester View Post
I've heard that the Caddy CTS with the manual gearbox feels kinda' sloppy in that car. I've never even seen a CTS manual except at a car show.

Wonder if the Camaro (which apparently uses essentialy the same hardware) has the same complaint?

It's gotta have a decent manual gearbox inside or it won't be fit for my garage.
Welcome to the site!!!

I can find them if you want, but if you peek around the site, you should be able to find a few articles by MotorTrend, etc. They drove the V6. There are also 15 people whom GM chose to provide input on the car for the past couple of years. They also drove the V6 manual. Every single review to-date has been nothing but positive.
__________________
"Keep the faith." - - Read Before You Post.
SIGN UP for 2014 Camaro5 HPDE @ Gingerman Raceway!
Mr. Wyndham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 03:14 PM   #185
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 21,881
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
There are a number of reviews on the V6 that you can look at for how the car should feel in this thread: review compilation
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
don't believe a thing you read about the next gen Camaro -- as history has proven time and time again:

WE DO NOT TALK ABOUT FUTURE PRODUCT PLANS PERIOD FbodFather
__________________

Camaro5 Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 03:27 PM   #186
Flighttester
 
Drives: 2008 Audi A4 3.2 MT S Line
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragoneye View Post
Welcome to the site!!!

I can find them if you want, but if you peek around the site, you should be able to find a few articles by MotorTrend, etc. They drove the V6. There are also 15 people whom GM chose to provide input on the car for the past couple of years. They also drove the V6 manual. Every single review to-date has been nothing but positive.
Thanks for the welcome.

I'm an old fart who comes from the sportscar world (from AH Sprites to Mazda RX-7's and MX-5's) but I was once a Chevy guy and my first car was a brand new '70 Camaro 300 horse SS350 4 speed.

If it works out, I just might buy another new Camaro, 40 years later.
Flighttester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 06:06 PM   #187
Mr. Wyndham
I used to be Dragoneye...
 
Mr. Wyndham's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 Camaro 1LE
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 25,786
Send a message via AIM to Mr. Wyndham
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flighttester View Post
Thanks for the welcome.

I'm an old fart who comes from the sportscar world (from AH Sprites to Mazda RX-7's and MX-5's) but I was once a Chevy guy and my first car was a brand new '70 Camaro 300 horse SS350 4 speed.

If it works out, I just might buy another new Camaro, 40 years later.
I think that would be nice.

You have any pictures of the '70 SS?
__________________
"Keep the faith." - - Read Before You Post.
SIGN UP for 2014 Camaro5 HPDE @ Gingerman Raceway!
Mr. Wyndham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 06:45 PM   #188
Flighttester
 
Drives: 2008 Audi A4 3.2 MT S Line
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragoneye View Post
I think that would be nice.

You have any pictures of the '70 SS?
Yeah. But none that are scanned in. (I'm writing this from a hotel room in Louisana. I'm down here on business).

Remember that really was 40 years ago and personal computers were not around yet, much less digital photography.

I liked the car when I had it but I really didn't miss it much when it was gone.

It usually worked ok but it wasn't trouble free. Being in the USAF, I made lots of trips between Southern Illinois (my home then) and South Carolina (where I was stationed most of the time I owned the car).

I eventually added an electronic ignition so that I didn't have to replace the spark plugs and points every 10,000 miles. It had about 11-1 compression ratio and it used leaded fuel, the exhaust system was shot in about two (2) years.

I sold the car after about three years (and over 60,000 miles). There was some serious rust starting to form at the rear window by that time. It was never driven in road salt much at all. I have to say my wife probably missed the car more than I did at the time. I've had lots of 'real' (two-seat) sports cars I liked better overall. But the Camaro was fun for a little while. Not a bad first car really.

It isn't true when they say those old ones were better than what they make now. I don't know about the new Camaro but even my current little '00 Miata is actually more overall fun to drive (handles way better) than that old '70 Camaro did and the Camaro had the factory handling package and everything else in the book you could add. I went through the book and factory ordered it from Jerome Chevrolet in Freeburg Illinois. It cost me $3,400 brand spankin' new.

But, it was fine looking though. Better stylng than this new one, in my opinion.
Flighttester is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Message to all Fbody Enthusiasts TAG UR IT 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 12 02-02-2013 07:41 PM
The new Camaro V6 might be the best model of the entire lineup! Mr. Wyndham 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 101 12-21-2010 07:48 PM
GM memo to dealers Moose 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 41 02-04-2010 07:33 PM
Another, albeit old, Camaro Article!!! Mr. Wyndham 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 1 07-30-2007 09:19 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.