Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
tandtperformance.com
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Chevy Camaro vs...

Chevy Camaro vs... Comparison of Chevy Camaro versus its competition. *NO STREET RACING STORIES*

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-31-2010, 08:25 PM   #26
ghazzi1397
Hail to the GENERAL
 
ghazzi1397's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 CGM 2LT/RS
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 423
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroFreako View Post
Like really, the V6 camaro....i feel it can't beat any other sport V6 car

maybe just the v6 challenger,

Hyundai's 2010 Genesis is faster

2010 350Z is faster

any infinite V6 car is faster

Altima coupe is faster too i guess

the new 2011 V6 mustang is faster

The V6 camaro is only a showcar, it looks nice, that all i guess



check this thread for a list of cars beaten by the V6
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showth...t=89691&page=2
__________________
Since the launch of the Camaro in 09, I've been dreaming of buying this car and finally today is the day. ORDER PLACED on 05/18/2010 for 2011 2LT CGM
(3300) Order scheduled for production, TPW 06/14/2010 [05/26/2010]
(3400) Order broadcast [06/15/2010]
(3800) Order produced [06/18/2010]
Available to ship from Osh [06/17/2010]
In-Transit from Osh [06/29/2010]
Available to ship from rail yard [07/08/2010]
Delivered [07/12/10]
ghazzi1397 is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 08:27 PM   #27
motorhead
bars suck
 
Drives: yummy
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: central, Pa
Posts: 7,257
I have a 2011 traverse with the same engine as your camaro, and you would still beat me.

Does that make you feel any better?
motorhead is online now  
Old 08-31-2010, 08:30 PM   #28
CamaroFreako
KMK
 
CamaroFreako's Avatar
 
Drives: Slow V6 Camaro
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: kuwait
Posts: 497
v6 challenger no contest but sweet car i said its slower

Hyundai's 2010 Genesis is faster it's a Hyundai, who cares so you are bias?

2010 350Z is faster price? no idea, still a V6?

any infinite V6 car is faster price? maybe due to luxury crap?

Altima coupe is faster too i guess really? no contest in design comparison though so only looks

the new 2011 V6 mustang is faster yes, I drove one. Still not prettier than the Camaro! but props to Ford anyway, sweet ride and only looks

The V6 camaro is only a showcar, it looks nice, that all i guess showcar? No one hangs out the window of their car taking pictures on their cell phones of V6 Mustangs, Genesis coupes, Altimas and Infinities. Have you driven your 1LT hard?

Time to sell your 1LT dude! maybe in the future
CamaroFreako is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 08:31 PM   #29
n!ght r!der
That Guy
 
n!ght r!der's Avatar
 
Drives: really good
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 861
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroFreako View Post
Like really, the V6 camaro....i feel it can't beat any other sport V6 car

maybe just the v6 challenger,
ehh
Hyundai's 2010 Genesis is faster
sort of...
2010 350Z is faster
370Z?
any infinite V6 car is faster
Infiniti G37 maybe i guess.
Altima coupe is faster too i guess
no
the new 2011 V6 mustang is faster
kinda
The V6 camaro is only a showcar, it looks nice, that all i guess
no

.
n!ght r!der is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 08:48 PM   #30
CamaroFreako
KMK
 
CamaroFreako's Avatar
 
Drives: Slow V6 Camaro
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: kuwait
Posts: 497
Quote:
Originally Posted by n!ght r!der View Post
2010 350Z is faster
370Z?

Altima coupe is faster too i guess
no
I mean one of those new 350Z not 2003 model or something old u happy u can beat it. didn't mean the 370Z

5.7 stock 0-60 altima coupe 3.5....so that a yes
CamaroFreako is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 08:53 PM   #31
CamaroFreako
KMK
 
CamaroFreako's Avatar
 
Drives: Slow V6 Camaro
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: kuwait
Posts: 497
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghazzi1397 View Post
check this thread for a list of cars beaten by the V6
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showth...t=89691&page=2
most of them are old models mustangs from 2005+

or sedans or won by driver error
CamaroFreako is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 08:57 PM   #32
ghazzi1397
Hail to the GENERAL
 
ghazzi1397's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 CGM 2LT/RS
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 423
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroFreako View Post
most of them are old models mustangs from 2005+

or sedans or won by driver error
I think its time for you to sell your LT man lol...maybe get a ZR1 this way you're king on the road or on the track
__________________
Since the launch of the Camaro in 09, I've been dreaming of buying this car and finally today is the day. ORDER PLACED on 05/18/2010 for 2011 2LT CGM
(3300) Order scheduled for production, TPW 06/14/2010 [05/26/2010]
(3400) Order broadcast [06/15/2010]
(3800) Order produced [06/18/2010]
Available to ship from Osh [06/17/2010]
In-Transit from Osh [06/29/2010]
Available to ship from rail yard [07/08/2010]
Delivered [07/12/10]
ghazzi1397 is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 08:59 PM   #33
nashstat
 
Drives: 2SS Camaro
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 432
"Who cares, it's a Hyundai"...

Almost all manufacturers care about what Hyundai is doing, because they have a reputation of making good products very quick.
nashstat is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 09:00 PM   #34
n!ght r!der
That Guy
 
n!ght r!der's Avatar
 
Drives: really good
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 861
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroFreako View Post
I mean one of those new 350Z not 2003 model or something old u happy u can beat it. didn't mean the 370Z

5.7 stock 0-60 altima coupe 3.5....so that a yes
so you mean a 2007-2009 350z?

I just read that the altima does 0-60 in 5.5 so its a little faster. but its still FWD lol. and thats outrageous.
n!ght r!der is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 09:04 PM   #35
IROCanSS
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 89 IROC 350
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Back roads, southern Ohio
Posts: 12,519
Quote:
Originally Posted by ULTRAZLS1 View Post
Some of them yeah...but not all IMO.

The 1990-1992 350tpi cars (1990 was still an iroc) could run as low as 13.9-14.0 in stock form and trapped as high as 98-99.

It would spank every 305 iroc no doubt. The 350 tpi in the 86-89 cars had a little less horsepower and would be about equal with the new 6. But I would think the 90-92 had an edge.
I have read all the arguing back and forth... I have a 89 IROC 350 tpi and it seems pretty slow. Maybe I am jsut used to the SS. We had the car since new and it used to seem much faster! I do have a hard time believing it will run with the V6 though... just saying.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroFreako View Post
I mean one of those new 350Z not 2003 model or something old u happy u can beat it. didn't mean the 370Z
370 took the place of the 350 a couple years ago. The 370 is pretty fast. My friend has one, it would roast the V6 Camaro, youre right.
IROCanSS is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 09:09 PM   #36
CamaroFreako
KMK
 
CamaroFreako's Avatar
 
Drives: Slow V6 Camaro
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: kuwait
Posts: 497
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghazzi1397 View Post
I think its time for you to sell your LT man lol...maybe get a ZR1 this way you're king on the road or on the track
Why would i sell my car?

I am talking about the V6 camaro in general, people happy it have 304 HP thinking it fast while its not
CamaroFreako is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 10:34 PM   #37
COPO_Chevy
 
COPO_Chevy's Avatar
 
Drives: '96 Riviera S/C; '87 Grand Prix LE
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chilton, Wisconsin
Posts: 469
Send a message via MSN to COPO_Chevy
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroFreako View Post
Why would i sell my car?

I am talking about the V6 camaro in general, people happy it have 304 HP thinking it fast while its not
FWIW, the v6 Camaro actually has 312hp @ 6500rpm and 278 ft/lb torq. @ 5100rpm..could be a little off on the rpm's but in any case, thats what it is.
__________________
1969 Buick LeSabre --- Need to sell..
1987 Pontiac Grand Prix --- Project
2013 Chrysler 200 Touring --- Daily Driver
________________ --- Reserved For Camaro
________________ --- Reserved For Classic Buick
COPO_Chevy is offline  
Old 09-01-2010, 01:28 AM   #38
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 21,864
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Comparing cars based on the engine alone is pretty misguided. The V6 Camaro is faster than a V8 Mercury Grand Marquis. Meanwhile, a 4 cylinder Cobalt SS is quicker than both of them. Engine configurations by themselves don't dictate performance. No single specification does.

The fairest comparison would be between cars of near equal price. In which case, the V6 Camaro actually competes against a lot of 4 cylinder cars, while the SS is priced against V6 cars. Additionally, the Camaro isn't about all out performance. Its affordable performance. And 300+ hp, 0-60 in around 6s, and 1/4 in the low 14s range is pretty good. Especially when you figure that you can get that for under $25k US. Its an extremely short list of cars that can do that. So sure, there are plenty of rides that are faster. But few are faster for less cash. And none will turn as many heads as the Camaro.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
don't believe a thing you read about the next gen Camaro -- as history has proven time and time again:

WE DO NOT TALK ABOUT FUTURE PRODUCT PLANS PERIOD FbodFather
__________________

Camaro5 Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline  
Old 09-01-2010, 02:20 AM   #39
MillerTime
Blowin the doors off!
 
MillerTime's Avatar
 
Drives: A 2013 SS RS 6M SR
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,402
I think you answered your own question...Yes the V6 is closer to the back of the pack in the 1/4 mile time. in this particular car it wasn't designed to be a 1/4 mile record breaker, It was for those who couldn't afford/didn't want a v8 but still wanted the awesome lines on this car. As you stated, there will always be something faster V6 or V8. If you just want to complain about how "slow" the V6 is when compared to other V6's then why did you buy it in the first place. Either way...enjoy your car or get something that you can enjoy.
__________________

2G1FS1EWXD9163847





MillerTime is offline  
Old 09-01-2010, 12:55 PM   #40
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 ABM LT/RS, 06 Chevy Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 9,045
How about we move this topic back to the original topic.....

Actually I don't care where this thread goes but I had to add my .02.

To the OP....what a whiner!! I have seen absolutely no pride in any of your posts and instead just like to talk about how slow you think it is, or how it can't beat anything, or you seem to almost want to make fun of other V6 owners who think their car is "fast".

Do you even like your car? Are you happy to be an owner? Can you sleep at night knowing that there are other cars out there in the same "class" that can beat it? Your comparing your car to the 370z and infinite cars...which are NOT in the same price point. You could strap on a turbo, have nearly 400 horses at the crank and still be under the price point of these cars.

By the way, since you like to go by Magazine results, you do know that motortrend recently got a 5.4 0- 60 time out of the synergy green manual car. Is 5.4 slow??? I mean lets get serious here.

These are ALL quick cars! Camaro's main fault is its weight....drop it down to mustang weight and you'd be looking at as quick or quicker times, but we all know that isn't likely until the next major update in 2014 or 2015.

All I have to say is, take some pride in your ride, or sell it and get a car that you feel is faster (when only a few more years down the road it will be "SLOW" compared to the newer competition)
__________________
Custom Magnaflow Exhaust, Vararam intake, MACE Ported Manifold, RX Ported TB, "Black Ice" manifold insulator, Elite Catch Can, ZL1 repro wheels, ZL1 Springs, DRL Harness, Front GM GFX, Heritage grill, Street Scene lower grill, NLP Spoiler, ZL1 rockers and much more!
KMPrenger is offline  
Old 09-01-2010, 12:58 PM   #41
2010 2-Tone


 
2010 2-Tone's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 RY 2SS with Custom Stripes
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Jennings, La.
Posts: 2,287
If you were that worried about speed, you should have bought the SS crybaby!!
__________________

-Custom Stripes, Eibach Drop Springs
-MagnaFlow 3" Catback with X pipe
-ADM CAI-Street Version, SLP 160 T-Stat
-Ragin Racin Custom Tune
-Kooks LT Coated Headers, Heritage Grille
-Barton Short Throw Shifter
-Slotted & Dimpled Rotors
-Powercoated Calipers by Mike
-Hawk Ceramic Pads
-Painted Roof
-Painted Gills & Back Panel
-3-M Clear Bra, AAC Plasma DRL's
404rwhp and 403tq
2010 2-Tone is offline  
Old 09-01-2010, 01:01 PM   #42
ViperTomcat
Banned
 
Drives: 2011 Avenger Heat
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,702
Its faster than a 1989 Dodge Omni.

There..it is faster than something.
ViperTomcat is offline  
Old 09-01-2010, 01:03 PM   #43
brandotron
I am the internets.
 
brandotron's Avatar
 
Drives: dangerously
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 12,720
It's faster than my rollerblades.
__________________
brandotron is offline  
Old 09-01-2010, 01:12 PM   #44
REEFBLUE93
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 1993 Rustang
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 943
You could beat my 500+ hp Fox, the tranny is in the shop right now....
REEFBLUE93 is offline  
Old 09-01-2010, 01:50 PM   #45
Georgie

 
Georgie's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro... soon
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,217
Quote:
Originally Posted by alrox View Post
You must be a religious person too.
lol wtf...
__________________
2011 IOM or CGM 1SS
Georgie is offline  
Old 09-01-2010, 02:11 PM   #46
2010SLVRBULIT


 
2010SLVRBULIT's Avatar
 
Drives: G5 & C6
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: MARS
Posts: 6,717
doesn't matter what you drive(6 vs 8), unless you track it often. Last time I checked the speed limit hasn't changed(much). Car design FTW. And if you think smaller powerplants can't put out, take a spin in a GTR...

Curious, how many tuners get asked, "is it a modded 4 or a 6 banger?"

maybe the OP is going through the 'shoulda bought a V8' saga:(
2010SLVRBULIT is offline  
Old 09-01-2010, 02:13 PM   #47
raqball
The little LS that could
 
raqball's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro LS
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Central USA
Posts: 641
This thread is cracking me up... Most owners of these cars (V6 or V8) don't race them at the track... If someone does race it, then they most probably have modified if to meet their racing needs...

I really have to LOL at the posters who think the V6 should be the fastest car on the planet for 23K....

Like I said, this thread is really making me laugh.... Thanks!!!!
__________________
---TSW Donington's 20x8.5 front & 20x10 rear
---InJen CAI
---Magnaflow Exhaust with X pipe
---Bel RX45 with laser shifters
---4 gauge cluster pack
---VIO 1.5 in car camera system with DVR
---CoStar / BlueStar
---MPD Spolier (awaiting delivery)
---Taillight lenses, bezels, side markers, and reverse lights all blacked out
raqball is offline  
Old 09-01-2010, 02:16 PM   #48
motorhead
bars suck
 
Drives: yummy
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: central, Pa
Posts: 7,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by ULTRAZLS1 View Post
I doubt you had the same firehawk as the one I showed in the link...unless you paid over 40k for it in the early 90's. If you had that car you would of known it. It was 350 hp and 390 tq at 34xx lbs. Thats no 14 second car my friend. Thats a 12 second car with traction.

They switched to a speed density system in 1990 and got more power. 245hp and 345 tq was the rating from then on.

You are not showing the stats from a 1990-1992 car and or they are incorrect. (as far as hp/tq....15.2 could happen...a 16 could happen...its driver/conditions)

http://www.thirdgen.org/1992-chevy-camaro
245hp/345tq

Some more tests and specs

http://www.prophetsofmadness.com/iro...magarticle.htm
(245 hp/345tq...97.7 trap speed. decent 14.7)

http://www.prophetsofmadness.com/iro...endofanera.htm
(14.4 @ 97.8 mph) 245hp/345 tq

Enough proof of the 14.4 and ~98 mph trap speed like I said in the first place?

I guess that was the best run of all time for the car. First time in history it has happened. But that was the best run ever right their. They must have been at Perfect DA in 50 degree weather with the wind behind them and a factory ringer (and with Evan Smiths dad BTW)...they could never have gone any faster than 14.4.

Ive hijacked this thread enough...Im out.
Thanks for calling me a lair on not owning the firehawk. I know the car very well thank you and have owned it for six years. It never ran for me anyhow what it was suppose to, that's why I sold it. As far as the spec I produce being wrong ,they are not. They are for a 1992 trans am not a Camaro. Camaro did have 245Hp in 1992. Look back at the very link you posted to the thirdgen and you will see what I'm taking about. That fact remains that no TPI ,other than the firehawk, which is slp, which means it's not solely stock,could ever run a 13.9. Your 5hp gain in the 1992 camaro over the trans am isn't going to get you a 1.3 sec quicker the 1/4mile.
motorhead is online now  
Old 09-01-2010, 02:33 PM   #49
raqball
The little LS that could
 
raqball's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro LS
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Central USA
Posts: 641
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroFreako View Post
Why would i sell my car?

I am talking about the V6 camaro in general, people happy it have 304 HP thinking it fast while its not
Wonders if he really even has a Camaro....

Ummmmm It's 312 hp cupcake...
__________________
---TSW Donington's 20x8.5 front & 20x10 rear
---InJen CAI
---Magnaflow Exhaust with X pipe
---Bel RX45 with laser shifters
---4 gauge cluster pack
---VIO 1.5 in car camera system with DVR
---CoStar / BlueStar
---MPD Spolier (awaiting delivery)
---Taillight lenses, bezels, side markers, and reverse lights all blacked out
raqball is offline  
Old 09-01-2010, 02:44 PM   #50
ViperTomcat
Banned
 
Drives: 2011 Avenger Heat
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,702
Quote:
Originally Posted by raqball View Post
Wonders if he really even has a Camaro....

Ummmmm It's 312 hp cupcake...
To be fair it hasnt been massively displayed or such as being 312 HP.

Most people saw the "304 HP" from the original ads and still are thinking that is true. GM quietly announced it re-rated the engine at 312HP.
ViperTomcat is offline  
 
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Looking for feedback from V6 owners Dare 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 171 10-22-2011 09:22 PM
Solo Performance V6 Mach-XL (Manual) and Mach-XLT (Auto) Exhaust Kits GOINGSOLO2 V6 Bolt-Ons & Tunes 13 07-13-2010 01:28 PM
Another V6 Oil Question ToyotaCamaro Mechanical Maintenance: Break-in / Oil & Fluids / Servicing 11 06-27-2010 09:51 PM
How can I make my v6 Camaro faster (0-60) alnajjd Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 79 11-23-2009 04:50 PM
4th Gen. Z28 to 5th Gen. V6 tryan2422 Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 27 11-11-2009 08:20 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.