10-25-2010, 10:00 PM | #505 |
Drives: V8 up front and 7-spd out back FTW Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 746
|
Don't get too confused here, two of the same size turbos compared to only one of the exact same size turbo will indeed spool slower.
However, two smaller turbos that effectively equal the size (when added together) of one larger turbo will actually spool a little faster than the single turbo, because the moment of inertia (MOI) increases at the square of speed, and these things spin fast. The two smaller sets of wheels have a lower MOI than the one larger. So in short, each turbo is receiving half of the exhaust, but they're half the size (of the single), but they still spool faster because the smaller wheels have less momentum to build up. In the real world it isn't a huge spool difference, and packaging is more of a concern. A single is simpler and so has less to go potentially wrong. If sized right, it will work perfectly well. That's why STS decided to go with the single rather than dual for the LLT (and I think they might not have small enough turbos to make them usable anyway. They already had to downsize the exhaust housing as it is.) Hopefully this clears up any misconceptions. (BTW, yes, I am still watching this and the other turbo threads. )
__________________
|
10-26-2010, 12:22 AM | #506 |
i wanna turbo...
__________________
|
|
10-26-2010, 10:37 AM | #507 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro LS Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,911
|
I always thought in a dual turbo setup one was smaller to spin up really fast and the other was a lot bigger to take over to put out the really big power. the smaller one was just to get things going....
i guess you learn something new every day. anyway keep up the good work Z Madness!! I can't wait for more info on this
__________________
2010 Summit White Camaro LS / M6 MRT V2.0 |
10-26-2010, 10:54 AM | #508 |
Retired
Drives: 2010 Camaro RS V6 #1301 DOB 3/23/09 Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ithaca NY
Posts: 2,563
|
I thought 2 small ones spool faster than 1 big one..........
|
10-26-2010, 11:11 AM | #509 | |
Drives: Really Slow Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: PA
Posts: 56,957
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
10-26-2010, 11:11 AM | #510 | |
Drives: V8 up front and 7-spd out back FTW Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 746
|
Quote:
What I described and what is being talked about here is a parallel twin-turbo setup, and with that you have to use two identical turbos. They do, in exactly the way I described above. |
|
10-26-2010, 11:16 AM | #511 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro LS Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,911
|
ahhh ok so they do exist hahhahaha ok thanks!! but I see what you are saying about 2 the same size. so really for our cars a single seems to be the way to go. thanks for the info
__________________
2010 Summit White Camaro LS / M6 MRT V2.0 |
10-26-2010, 06:16 PM | #512 |
Drives: 2010, 2000, 1971 Camaros Join Date: May 2010
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 535
|
Allturbo, glad you are still around. I thought you'd be lurking somewhere...hehehehe
Again, bottom line for our cars is the single should be more than sufficient for around 400-ish rwhp. I say, knock yourself out. You got the funds and the know how, go for twins. For me, the single is fine. I am having much fun as is and still trying to get the most out of the single. Now, when I get my Z-28, that'll be another story, if its not already Supercharged. I would definately go twins with an LS3... |
10-27-2010, 09:55 AM | #513 |
Rev Couture
Drives: 2010 LS Camaro & 2013 Rav4 Ltd Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jamlando, FL
Posts: 1,129
|
Still around. Still subscribed. However I dont have much to contribute at this point, haha Looks like everyone has it figured out on the turbos. Doesnt sound like twins are needed at this point when 5 psi is all the motor can handle before oil starts squirting.
__________________
EBC Brakes| DOT 4|Bigworm| SickSpeed| BMR | IPF | Vararam| MRT |MGW | Nitto | Rx |
Iggee |ZL-1 Sways| Hurst | Apex Racing|Past: Srt-4| 6.0L GTO- RIP | '98 Integra |
10-27-2010, 10:48 AM | #514 |
Loose is Fast!
Drives: Mikes Hard Lemons Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Brick House
Posts: 645
|
Here is some really helpful information on turbo systems.
http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbob...o_tech101.html The 101 is pretty basic. 102 and 103 is the meat and potatoes for sizing if you want to choose a turbo yourself. If your doing twins just divide the Q (flow rate) by 2. The pressure ratio will stay the same. |
10-27-2010, 01:50 PM | #515 | |
Trust me I'm a Scientist.
|
Quote:
__________________
"From ZERO to a Tire-Burning HERO!"
Mods: RotoFab CAI, SW Headers, HiFlo Cats, Borla Atak Catback, Nightfury Cam, Ported Heads,Intake,TB, melling pump, Morosso Oil Separator. |
|
10-27-2010, 03:07 PM | #516 | |
Drives: Varies Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 2,182
|
Quote:
Most of the twins you will see are in a V6 or inline 6 configuration. |
|
10-27-2010, 04:39 PM | #517 |
dirtbag
Drives: 2010 camaro LS Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Addison TX
Posts: 1,037
|
i dont think i have ever seen a tt evo.......or any 4 banger for that matter
|
10-27-2010, 05:05 PM | #518 |
Drives: Something Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 66
|
Twin turbos just aren't necessary on such small displacement engines. Back when I drove an eclipse, I heard of a few that had done a twin or a sequential setup, but not very many. Cost just isn't worth it.
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Updated - Twins almost here! - STS (Twin Turbo) Camaro SS | 5th Gen SS | Forced Induction - V8 | 249 | 08-19-2012 09:45 PM |
Granatelli / Turbo Tech Twin Bottom Mount Turbo Systems | Granatelli | Forced Induction | 20 | 11-30-2010 06:47 PM |
Why TT over SC? | Jefe's SS | Forced Induction - V8 | 10 | 10-02-2010 03:14 AM |
STS Remote Mount Turbo Kit for V6 | ZNOLMT | Forced Induction - V6 | 102 | 06-09-2010 12:18 PM |
ULTIMATE PERFORMANCE* TURBO Camaro SS -- 750hp Custom Single Turbo Kit (T04Z) | Ultimate Performance | Forced Induction - V8 | 496 | 10-11-2009 01:29 PM |