Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Vararam
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V6


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-25-2010, 10:00 PM   #505
ALLTRBO
 
ALLTRBO's Avatar
 
Drives: V8 up front and 7-spd out back FTW
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 746
Don't get too confused here, two of the same size turbos compared to only one of the exact same size turbo will indeed spool slower.

However, two smaller turbos that effectively equal the size (when added together) of one larger turbo will actually spool a little faster than the single turbo, because the moment of inertia (MOI) increases at the square of speed, and these things spin fast. The two smaller sets of wheels have a lower MOI than the one larger.
So in short, each turbo is receiving half of the exhaust, but they're half the size (of the single), but they still spool faster because the smaller wheels have less momentum to build up.

In the real world it isn't a huge spool difference, and packaging is more of a concern. A single is simpler and so has less to go potentially wrong. If sized right, it will work perfectly well. That's why STS decided to go with the single rather than dual for the LLT (and I think they might not have small enough turbos to make them usable anyway. They already had to downsize the exhaust housing as it is.)

Hopefully this clears up any misconceptions.
(BTW, yes, I am still watching this and the other turbo threads. )
__________________
ALLTRBO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2010, 12:22 AM   #506
Croatcamaro2010
 
Croatcamaro2010's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 Camaro RS 1LT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Saint Louis
Posts: 322
i wanna turbo...
__________________
Support the CCFA and donate to my fund!

http://www.active.com/donate/napa12midastl/stlNBrekal
Croatcamaro2010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2010, 10:37 AM   #507
Edge.128

 
Edge.128's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro LS
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,911
I always thought in a dual turbo setup one was smaller to spin up really fast and the other was a lot bigger to take over to put out the really big power. the smaller one was just to get things going....

i guess you learn something new every day.

anyway keep up the good work Z Madness!! I can't wait for more info on this
__________________
2010 Summit White Camaro LS / M6
MRT V2.0

Edge.128 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2010, 10:54 AM   #508
ROD1
Retired
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro RS V6 #1301 DOB 3/23/09
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ithaca NY
Posts: 2,563
I thought 2 small ones spool faster than 1 big one..........
ROD1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2010, 11:11 AM   #509
PoorMansCamaro



 
PoorMansCamaro's Avatar
 
Drives: Really Slow
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: PA
Posts: 56,957
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edge.128 View Post
I always thought in a dual turbo setup one was smaller to spin up really fast and the other was a lot bigger to take over to put out the really big power. the smaller one was just to get things going....

i guess you learn something new every day.

anyway keep up the good work Z Madness!! I can't wait for more info on this
I believe there is a setup like this. It's called sequential turbos.
__________________
PoorMansCamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2010, 11:11 AM   #510
ALLTRBO
 
ALLTRBO's Avatar
 
Drives: V8 up front and 7-spd out back FTW
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 746
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edge.128 View Post
I always thought in a dual turbo setup one was smaller to spin up really fast and the other was a lot bigger to take over to put out the really big power. the smaller one was just to get things going....

i guess you learn something new every day.

anyway keep up the good work Z Madness!! I can't wait for more info on this
That can be done with a series/sequential twin-turbo setup, they exist too (but much less commonly). They can get rather complex to work properly. You can find lots of info about the various setups on the internet.

What I described and what is being talked about here is a parallel twin-turbo setup, and with that you have to use two identical turbos.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ROD1 View Post
I thought 2 small ones spool faster than 1 big one..........
They do, in exactly the way I described above.
ALLTRBO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2010, 11:16 AM   #511
Edge.128

 
Edge.128's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro LS
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,911
ahhh ok so they do exist hahhahaha ok thanks!! but I see what you are saying about 2 the same size. so really for our cars a single seems to be the way to go. thanks for the info
__________________
2010 Summit White Camaro LS / M6
MRT V2.0

Edge.128 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2010, 06:16 PM   #512
Z Madness
 
Z Madness's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010, 2000, 1971 Camaros
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 535
Allturbo, glad you are still around. I thought you'd be lurking somewhere...hehehehe

Again, bottom line for our cars is the single should be more than sufficient for around 400-ish rwhp.

I say, knock yourself out. You got the funds and the know how, go for twins. For me, the single is fine. I am having much fun as is and still trying to get the most out of the single.

Now, when I get my Z-28, that'll be another story, if its not already Supercharged. I would definately go twins with an LS3...
Z Madness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2010, 09:55 AM   #513
stand-al0ne
Rev Couture
 
stand-al0ne's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 LS Camaro & 2013 Rav4 Ltd
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jamlando, FL
Posts: 1,129
Still around. Still subscribed. However I dont have much to contribute at this point, haha Looks like everyone has it figured out on the turbos. Doesnt sound like twins are needed at this point when 5 psi is all the motor can handle before oil starts squirting.
__________________
EBC Brakes| DOT 4|Bigworm| SickSpeed| BMR | IPF | Vararam| MRT |MGW | Nitto | Rx |
Iggee |ZL-1 Sways| Hurst | Apex Racing|Past: Srt-4| 6.0L GTO- RIP | '98 Integra
stand-al0ne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2010, 10:48 AM   #514
CAMAR0
Loose is Fast!
 
CAMAR0's Avatar
 
Drives: Mikes Hard Lemons
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Brick House
Posts: 645
Here is some really helpful information on turbo systems.

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbob...o_tech101.html

The 101 is pretty basic. 102 and 103 is the meat and potatoes for sizing if you want to choose a turbo yourself. If your doing twins just divide the Q (flow rate) by 2. The pressure ratio will stay the same.
CAMAR0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2010, 01:50 PM   #515
Dyk-NO
Trust me I'm a Scientist.
 
Drives: My wifey ;P
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edge.128 View Post
I always thought in a dual turbo setup one was smaller to spin up really fast and the other was a lot bigger to take over to put out the really big power. the smaller one was just to get things going....

i guess you learn something new every day.

anyway keep up the good work Z Madness!! I can't wait for more info on this
I'm thinking about this one too, this is a common set-up for import TT cars, I even read of a 1000hp TT evo built by AMS using this setup. hmmmm. .. .
__________________
"From ZERO to a Tire-Burning HERO!"

Mods: RotoFab CAI, SW Headers, HiFlo Cats, Borla Atak Catback, Nightfury Cam, Ported Heads,Intake,TB, melling pump, Morosso Oil Separator.
Dyk-NO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2010, 03:07 PM   #516
Team STILLEN

 
Team STILLEN's Avatar
 
Drives: Varies
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 2,182
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyk-NO View Post
I'm thinking about this one too, this is a common set-up for import TT cars, I even read of a 1000hp TT evo built by AMS using this setup. hmmmm. .. .
Evo's usually aren't twin turbo. The engine in the Evo is a 2 liter 4 cylinder, even stroked its 2.2-2.3 liters. Generally to get to 1000 hp in the Evo, they will do a big single GT42 or larger at big, big boost numbers 40+psi.

Most of the twins you will see are in a V6 or inline 6 configuration.
Team STILLEN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2010, 04:39 PM   #517
rhd
dirtbag
 
rhd's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 camaro LS
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Addison TX
Posts: 1,037
i dont think i have ever seen a tt evo.......or any 4 banger for that matter
rhd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2010, 05:05 PM   #518
littleman54321
 
littleman54321's Avatar
 
Drives: Something
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhd View Post
i dont think i have ever seen a tt evo.......or any 4 banger for that matter
Twin turbos just aren't necessary on such small displacement engines. Back when I drove an eclipse, I heard of a few that had done a twin or a sequential setup, but not very many. Cost just isn't worth it.
littleman54321 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Updated - Twins almost here! - STS (Twin Turbo) Camaro SS 5th Gen SS Forced Induction - V8 249 08-19-2012 09:45 PM
Granatelli / Turbo Tech Twin Bottom Mount Turbo Systems Granatelli Forced Induction 20 11-30-2010 06:47 PM
Why TT over SC? Jefe's SS Forced Induction - V8 10 10-02-2010 03:14 AM
STS Remote Mount Turbo Kit for V6 ZNOLMT Forced Induction - V6 102 06-09-2010 12:18 PM
ULTIMATE PERFORMANCE* TURBO Camaro SS -- 750hp Custom Single Turbo Kit (T04Z) Ultimate Performance Forced Induction - V8 496 10-11-2009 01:29 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.