Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Rick@Livernois
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-04-2009, 06:21 PM   #18
djsnoflake
Faith Keeper
 
djsnoflake's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Silverado LTZ, 2010 2SS/RS
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada
Posts: 2,764
From honda website (http://automobiles.honda.com/s2000/performance.aspx) re: 2009 S200: "The S2000 sports a powerful, 2.2-liter" and "Are you ready for 237 hp at 7800 rpm and 162 lb-ft of torque at 6800 rpm?"

No wonder it gets not so great gas mileage. You have to have that thing howling to get and power out of it. What do you drop the clutch at to launch this thing? 6000 RPM?
It doesn't sound like they are "10 years ahead of GM in the 4 cylinder category", It sounds like they took one of their motorbike engines and put it in a car.

Cobalt SS is 260hp@5300 and 260lb/ft @ 2000. Which is at least in the practically useable range.

And on the topic of reliability, I can't see something that has to be revved to almost 8000 RPM lasting terribly long. But maybe they do. I stopped being interested in the S2000 when I found out about it's piddly torque.
djsnoflake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 06:22 PM   #19
TheClassicCarKid

 
TheClassicCarKid's Avatar
 
Drives: V45
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1982camaro View Post
the v6 is doing 0-60 in 6.2, my prelude is around the same area.



i need something faster. The v6 camaro is not going to be enough.
Doesn't a prelude do 0-60 in 7 or 8 seconds?
Anyway, why exactly would you want a smaller displacement engine? Do you and torque not get along well?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1320junkie View Post
All of the stang guys in one thread..wow..lol
.
TheClassicCarKid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 06:22 PM   #20
1982camaro
 
1982camaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 1982 camaro
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: california
Posts: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ject View Post
a few mods here and there and you'd be surprised.
few mods on the prelude and you would be surprised too
1982camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 06:23 PM   #21
bolteon593

 
Drives: 2011 GT500
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: southern california
Posts: 902
once again, it's impressive cause it's always been expensive...


lots of r/d work = more hp = higher price.

you love the engine so much, go get an s2000.
bolteon593 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 06:24 PM   #22
TheClassicCarKid

 
TheClassicCarKid's Avatar
 
Drives: V45
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1982camaro View Post
few mods on the prelude and you would be surprised too
Then stick with the prelude?
idk what you're getting at.
LS3 is a good motor. Probably run 150 thousand miles before you run into problems if you treat it right.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1320junkie View Post
All of the stang guys in one thread..wow..lol
.
TheClassicCarKid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 06:28 PM   #23
1982camaro
 
1982camaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 1982 camaro
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: california
Posts: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheClassicCarKid View Post
Doesn't a prelude do 0-60 in 7 or 8 seconds?
Anyway, why exactly would you want a smaller displacement engine? Do you and torque not get along well?


usdm preludes do 0-60 from 6.5- 6.8



i have the jdm type s engine and i get around 6.0-6.3


its not that i want a smaller displacement engine, it just have a few questions when a ford engine can get 400 horses with 5.0 and gm with 6.2 of displacement
1982camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 06:29 PM   #24
djsnoflake
Faith Keeper
 
djsnoflake's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Silverado LTZ, 2010 2SS/RS
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada
Posts: 2,764
Quote:
Do you and torque not get along well?
Yeah, that's what I don't get. If you are really concerned about speed, torque is what's really gonna get you going fast. Horsepower is a great number, but torque gives you an idea of how quick you are gonna get to that speed.


And is this new 400 hp 5.0 actually in any vehicle yet?
djsnoflake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 06:31 PM   #25
1982camaro
 
1982camaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 1982 camaro
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: california
Posts: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by bolteon593 View Post
once again, it's impressive cause it's always been expensive...


lots of r/d work = more hp = higher price.

you love the engine so much, go get an s2000.




i have had too many 4 cylinders, need something different. i have to have a v8. need to try something new
1982camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 06:33 PM   #26
1982camaro
 
1982camaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 1982 camaro
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: california
Posts: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheClassicCarKid View Post
Then stick with the prelude?
idk what you're getting at.
LS3 is a good motor. Probably run 150 thousand miles before you run into problems if you treat it right.



im sure it is, and the warranty backs it up.



but what if gm dies? is that warranty still good?
1982camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 06:36 PM   #27
TheClassicCarKid

 
TheClassicCarKid's Avatar
 
Drives: V45
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1982camaro View Post
i have had too many 4 cylinders, need something different. i have to have a v8. need to try something new
Then get an SS and I'm sure you'll be happy. It'll be a bit quicker than the prelude.
There's nothing wrong with the LS3, it's just a different kind of motor than ford's modular engines.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1320junkie View Post
All of the stang guys in one thread..wow..lol
.
TheClassicCarKid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 06:36 PM   #28
1982camaro
 
1982camaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 1982 camaro
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: california
Posts: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by djsnoflake View Post
Yeah, that's what I don't get. If you are really concerned about speed, torque is what's really gonna get you going fast. Horsepower is a great number, but torque gives you an idea of how quick you are gonna get to that speed.


And is this new 400 hp 5.0 actually in any vehicle yet?



i think the mustang is getting it next year.
1982camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 06:38 PM   #29
1982camaro
 
1982camaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 1982 camaro
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: california
Posts: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheClassicCarKid View Post
Then get an SS and I'm sure you'll be happy. It'll be a bit quicker than the prelude.
There's nothing wrong with the LS3, it's just a different kind of motor than ford's modular engines.
it will be much quicker than the lude!!!
1982camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 06:38 PM   #30
TheClassicCarKid

 
TheClassicCarKid's Avatar
 
Drives: V45
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1982camaro View Post
im sure it is, and the warranty backs it up.



but what if gm dies? is that warranty still good?
I don't know if GM would have any kind of warranty protection if they go under. But honestly, I don't think you have to worry about that.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1320junkie View Post
All of the stang guys in one thread..wow..lol
.
TheClassicCarKid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 06:51 PM   #31
bolteon593

 
Drives: 2011 GT500
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: southern california
Posts: 902
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1982camaro View Post
i think the mustang is getting it next year.
jesus, that's next year...


what the hell are you bantering about?


i sure dont see you asking what if ford goes under and that engine never happens...


go troll somewhere else, your not the ls3 type.


perhapes a smart car will suit you better.
bolteon593 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 06:54 PM   #32
1982camaro
 
1982camaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 1982 camaro
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: california
Posts: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by bolteon593 View Post
jesus, that's next year...


what the hell are you bantering about?


i sure dont see you asking what if ford goes under and that engine never happens...


go troll somewhere else, your not the ls3 type.


perhapes a smart car will suit you better.



im just asking questions, no need to get all emotional and kick others out.

screw that homo smart car
1982camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 07:14 PM   #33
bolteon593

 
Drives: 2011 GT500
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: southern california
Posts: 902
we've explained to you, the ls3 will last just as long as any foreign motor... 200k+ miles.


questions answered.
bolteon593 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 07:20 PM   #34
Gary B
 
Gary B's Avatar
 
Drives: 12 SS 45th
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ct.
Posts: 518
Ford will never outpower GM with a naturally aspirated engine. Ever since they adapted the "cammer" design, it's been a losing battle. If the new 5.0 is the OHV design, it still won't compare with HP and still get decent MPG's!
Gary B is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.