Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
HeadlightArmor
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Specific Models / Packages > Camaro Convertible Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-10-2012, 12:49 PM   #1
Lee123

 
Lee123's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 2SS M6
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 768
Effectiveness of new plexiglass wind restrictor?

I have the GM wind screen that folds up and down directly behind the front seats. My wife loves it because it keeps her hair from blowing into her face and I like it on colder days when I want the top down. It is really quite effective, but not much to look at.

Lately I've seen the new plexiglass wind restrictor that mounts behind the back seat and light up at night. I really like the way it looks, but wonder if it would do much good for the front seat people since it is smaller and further back. If anyone has had both, please give your opinion of the effectiveness of the new wind restrictor compared to the GM version. I don't want to spend $400 and find that it looks great but doesn't do much.
__________________
2012 2SS Convertible
Magnuson, Headers, Cam, JRE Tune. 563 HP.
Lee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 10:15 PM   #2
goldappa
 
Drives: Camaro 2011 RS Convertible
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Spring, Tx
Posts: 145
It looks great but doesn't do much!
goldappa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 10:32 PM   #3
Lee123

 
Lee123's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 2SS M6
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldappa View Post
It looks great but doesn't do much!
Thanks for answering. Do you have one?
__________________
2012 2SS Convertible
Magnuson, Headers, Cam, JRE Tune. 563 HP.
Lee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 08:26 AM   #4
Baba

 
Baba's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2LT RS Convertible
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: USAREUR, CONUS/DOD-A, VA
Posts: 1,718
Unfortunatley, there's usually a trade-off with some of these things. The OEM windscreen, from what I've read and pics I've seen, doesn't allow for backseat passengers when it's in place and takes a bit of room to store. At ~$400, it isn't exactly inexpensive, either.

The windrestrictor is quite small and too far back in the cabin to be as or very effective on a car as large as the 5th Gen. On a smaller vehicle, in particular the Saturn SKY and Pontiac Solstice, they are VERY effectve due to their much smaller cabin and it being a small, 2 seat roadster. They are VERY popular among SKY and Sol owners. The other advantage of the windrestrictor is that it is customizable with graphics and lights and is, for many, a purely or mainly aesthetic mod for their vehicle.
__________________
2011 Camaro 2LT RS Convertible
Summit White
Black Leather
3 Pedals
Build Date: 06/27/2011

Purchased: 07/30/2011
Title Received: 08/15/2011

1984 Camaro (3rd Gen.): Traded: 1987

"Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss."
Baba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 10:44 AM   #5
Lee123

 
Lee123's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 2SS M6
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 768
Thanks for answering. Looks like I'm going to stick with the old wind screen. The main reason I bought it is that it keeps my wife's hair from blowing in the face. The new one looks great, but it's really important that it be as effective as possible. I seriously doubt that anyone will ever sit in the back seat anyway.
__________________
2012 2SS Convertible
Magnuson, Headers, Cam, JRE Tune. 563 HP.
Lee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 11:03 AM   #6
Nutbutt


 
Nutbutt's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 RJT 2LT/RS Convertible
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Western Massachusetts
Posts: 3,387
I have the plexiglas Windrestrictor and while it looks small it actually stand pretty tall based on the mounting on the back deck.
As for it effectiveness, it is not as effective as the GM one that sits right behind the front seat. However it does cut down the wind backlash quite a bit and with the side windows up it is very effective, again not as good as the GM one but still really good.
The two big things for me was I don't have to remove it and remount, this is a big pain, really big pain. And secondly I can use the backseat at any time.
Lastly the looks are simply great. One of the biggest attention getters. This may or may not be that important.
I had both and ended up selling the GM screen recently.
__________________
1st IPF Supercharged 2011 2LT/RS RJT Convertible
Nutbutt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 11:18 AM   #7
Lee123

 
Lee123's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 2SS M6
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 768
I still haven't given up on the idea, just because it looks so good. I'm going to look for the installation instructions later today. Do you drive your car with the top down and no tonneau? If so, how does this effect the top fabric blowing around? I'm thinking being closer to the top it might calm the air back there a bit.
__________________
2012 2SS Convertible
Magnuson, Headers, Cam, JRE Tune. 563 HP.
Lee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 11:29 AM   #8
pocketcthulhu
 
pocketcthulhu's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 2ss/RS 5th gen Camaro #2
Join Date: May 2012
Location: arkansas
Posts: 493
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baba View Post
Unfortunatley, there's usually a trade-off with some of these things. The OEM windscreen, from what I've read and pics I've seen, doesn't allow for backseat passengers when it's in place and takes a bit of room to store. At ~$400, it isn't exactly inexpensive, either.

The windrestrictor is quite small and too far back in the cabin to be as or very effective on a car as large as the 5th Gen. On a smaller vehicle, in particular the Saturn SKY and Pontiac Solstice, they are VERY effectve due to their much smaller cabin and it being a small, 2 seat roadster. They are VERY popular among SKY and Sol owners. The other advantage of the windrestrictor is that it is customizable with graphics and lights and is, for many, a purely or mainly aesthetic mod for their vehicle.
I agree They worked wonders on the saturn skys but i Honestly can't see it doing anything but looking good on the camaro.
__________________
pocketcthulhu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 11:30 AM   #9
Nutbutt


 
Nutbutt's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 RJT 2LT/RS Convertible
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Western Massachusetts
Posts: 3,387
Yes, without the cover with the top down there is a lot less shifting of the folded top even at highway speeds.
__________________
1st IPF Supercharged 2011 2LT/RS RJT Convertible
Nutbutt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 11:35 AM   #10
Lee123

 
Lee123's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 2SS M6
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nutbutt View Post
Yes, without the cover with the top down there is a lot less shifting of the folded top even at highway speeds.
That's a really good thing! I'm going have to think about this one a bit.
__________________
2012 2SS Convertible
Magnuson, Headers, Cam, JRE Tune. 563 HP.
Lee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 01:13 PM   #11
plan-b
No Compromise
 
plan-b's Avatar
 
Drives: '04 996 C4S, '11 2SS Convertible
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: SFBA, California
Posts: 199
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nutbutt View Post
Yes, without the cover with the top down there is a lot less shifting of the folded top even at highway speeds.
That's the first thing I noticed when I installed mine. The buffeting in the cabin is reduced perceptibly, but not dramatically. The folded top, however, moved around a lot less after installing this. I almost never use the boot cover.

I posted an install thread when I got it and my conclusion is not to buy it as purely a functional piece. I'm very happy with mine because I wanted both function and aesthetics. It has enough of each to have been worth the cost for me.
plan-b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 02:30 PM   #12
goldappa
 
Drives: Camaro 2011 RS Convertible
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Spring, Tx
Posts: 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee123 View Post
Thanks for answering. Do you have one?
I do have one. If you're looking for a significant reduction in wind, don't get it. If you want some reduction and lots of cool factor. Go right ahead.
goldappa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 02:35 PM   #13
Lee123

 
Lee123's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 2SS M6
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 768
I can't seem to find install instructions so I have a couple of questions. Does it only fasten with 2 bolts? How sturdy is it once you get the bolts tightened? How does the lighting hook up?
__________________
2012 2SS Convertible
Magnuson, Headers, Cam, JRE Tune. 563 HP.
Lee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 02:43 PM   #14
plan-b
No Compromise
 
plan-b's Avatar
 
Drives: '04 996 C4S, '11 2SS Convertible
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: SFBA, California
Posts: 199
Mine isn't illuminated so the install was about a 3 minute job. You take the allen key that they provide and loosen (but not remove) the 2 lugs that the boot cover snaps/loops onto. The slide the brackets on the Wind Restrictor down onto them. Then tighten them back up. The lugs are held on by nuts on the inside and there's no way to get a wrench back there (not that I can see anyway) so getting it properly tightened up isn't easy. But even with just moderate snugness, it holds on fairly well. You'll see it wobbling while driving though.
plan-b is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.