Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
sjm autoprod
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Technical Camaro Topics > Suspension / Brakes / Chassis


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-20-2014, 07:04 AM   #71
marolf101x
 
Drives: 2010 Test Mule
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 61
"Can your camber plate be used with any other coilover/shock "
I am investigating that question right now.

Basically our upper mount uses a bearing that has a 0.75" ID.
If your current mount is 0.75" it should work just fine.

The length is specific to our strut, however this is a strut, which is almost 1:1 motion ratio, with 5" of total travel, so a change of +/-0.25" at the mount height will not affect anything.
__________________
Skunk Werks
Ridetech
www.ridetech.com
marolf101x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2014, 03:24 PM   #72
rockrau
 
rockrau's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2ss red LS3
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: perkasie pa
Posts: 530
According to the instructions, ride height is adjusted with spring preload. How does one adjust ride height and get the car corner balanced?
rockrau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2014, 10:55 AM   #73
marolf101x
 
Drives: 2010 Test Mule
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 61
Corner balance is set up just like any other "traditional" coil over, by adding or removing wedge by increasing or decreasing the preload of the spring.

More important is static weight distribution. You need to physically move weight around the car to get it as balanced as you can (or to whatever your goal is). This is a coarse adjustment where large gains can be made. Corner balancing via the coil over is a fine adjustment that has the downside of changing physical ride height. On a dedicated race car this is typically not a problem as they are only turning one way, or know the turns and amount of travel required. This is much more difficult on a street car where the road is unknown.

When designing our struts we looked at making the lower mount adjustable. Though ride height adjustment independent of spring preload is nice, Fox shot down the idea early on due to concerns of keeping the lower adjuster tight. To design it correctly (meaning if a locking device came loose the strut would not fall apart) required expensive machining and components which would ultimately make the selling price quite a bit higher. So the decision was made pretty early on to keep the "traditional" set up of adjusting vehicle height with spring preload.
__________________
Skunk Werks
Ridetech
www.ridetech.com
marolf101x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2014, 09:35 PM   #74
Cuda7050
 
Cuda7050's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 SS LS3
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NorCal
Posts: 692
Approximately how much negative camber and caster can be added with the offset holes. Would it be possible to run a tire friendly alignment setting, then put an aggressive alignment at the track and then return to the street alignment at the end of the day?
__________________
Buttonwillow 2:23.736
Sacramento Raceway 12.89 at 112 mph
Thunderhill 2:22.242
Cuda7050 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2014, 06:02 AM   #75
marolf101x
 
Drives: 2010 Test Mule
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 61
I'll have to look at the actual numbers on Monday, but the quick answer is YES you can have a very aggressive track setting and a normal street setting.
__________________
Skunk Werks
Ridetech
www.ridetech.com
marolf101x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2014, 01:18 PM   #76
kyle@ridetech.com
 
kyle@ridetech.com's Avatar
 
Drives: 1969 SS/RS Camaro
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 264
The front strut uses a 6" travel cartridge. The rear uses a 3.6" stroke shock. The standard rates that come in the kit (which can be swapped to any different rate with no additional cost) are a 275 in/lb in the front and a 500 in/lb in the rear. The motion ratios we used are the same as the factory. The front being a strut is damn near a perfect 1:1 ratio and if memory serves me right the rear is like a 1.5:1 ratio. I don't know that for sure, but I can measure it and find out.
kyle@ridetech.com is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2014, 02:51 PM   #77
kyle@ridetech.com
 
kyle@ridetech.com's Avatar
 
Drives: 1969 SS/RS Camaro
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by 130R View Post
For some reason my calculations kept coming up with 0.75:1 for the rear, but I just measured it at 1.59:1 with a 4" stroke.
The stroke of the shock should have nothing to do with the motion ratio. The motion ratio is the mechanical advantage (lever ratio) that the wheel has over the spring in compressing it. It can get a little confusing when expressing it as a ratio. Basically, you will measure from the control arm pivot point to the shock mount We'll call that dimension A. Then, you will measure from that same pivot to the ball joint. Or, in the case of a rear suspension, the upright pivot. We'll call that dimension B. If you divide dimension A by dimension be it will give you a decimal. Let's say from your pivot to the shock mount is 5" and from your pivot to your ball joint is 10". If you divide 5 by ten, you come up with .5. This is expressed as a 2:1 ratio. For every two inches the wheel moves, the shock only moves an inch. Hope this helps.
kyle@ridetech.com is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2014, 03:00 PM   #78
130R
 
Drives: SS
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 221
No, I get it. I didn't know if there was a rising or falling rate so I mentioned the 4" stroke of the shock I'm using as I will obviously measure more wheel travel.
130R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2014, 03:51 PM   #79
Firefighter


 
Firefighter's Avatar
 
Drives: Black '13 2SS/RS/1LE w/NPP/NAV
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tampa by way of Miami...
Posts: 4,394
Well seems like you guys better make twice as many as you had planned. You get Pfadts sales now by default. Good time to release these then. No Pedders and No Pfadt...

I hope these are as good as they seem like they will be.
__________________
Firefighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2014, 04:00 PM   #80
Anaconda
 
Anaconda's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro 1SS 6-speed VR
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere nice and cool
Posts: 305
I wonder if there will be a group buy? :group hug:
__________________
2013 Victory Red 1SS 6-speed w/ black stripes ordered 8/15/12
Delivered 10/2/2012!
Corsa ZL1 catback exhaust, Black CAI intake with scoop and washer bottle relocation
Anaconda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2014, 05:09 PM   #81
kyle@ridetech.com
 
kyle@ridetech.com's Avatar
 
Drives: 1969 SS/RS Camaro
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firefighter View Post
Well seems like you guys better make twice as many as you had planned. You get Pfadts sales now by default. Good time to release these then. No Pedders and No Pfadt...

I hope these are as good as they seem like they will be.
There was a LOT of R&D that went into the development of these CoilOvers, so it's not just hype. I'm not a big fan of getting the sales by default. I would have much rather seen our product as the go to coil over because they truly are the best one on the market.
kyle@ridetech.com is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2014, 05:46 PM   #82
Firefighter


 
Firefighter's Avatar
 
Drives: Black '13 2SS/RS/1LE w/NPP/NAV
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tampa by way of Miami...
Posts: 4,394
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyle@ridetech.com View Post
There was a LOT of R&D that went into the development of these CoilOvers, so it's not just hype. I'm not a big fan of getting the sales by default. I would have much rather seen our product as the go to coil over because they truly are the best one on the market.
Believe me I'm convinced you guys worked hard to get these the way you wanted them. As far as sales by default... a sale is a sale is a sale.

One question though. Is there any reason why you didn't use an inverted design? I really liked that about the Pfadts.

Also before today's events I was looking hard at your product. I was waiting to see what people thought of them.

I'm looking to get a set in a couple of months, so there would be plenty of time for reviews to come out.

Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk
__________________
Firefighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2014, 05:50 PM   #83
Apex Motorsports
 
Apex Motorsports's Avatar
 
Drives: 2000 Camaro SS
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Louisville, Ky.
Posts: 25,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firefighter View Post
Well seems like you guys better make twice as many as you had planned. You get Pfadts sales now by default. Good time to release these then. No Pedders and No Pfadt...

I hope these are as good as they seem like they will be.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyle@ridetech.com View Post
There was a LOT of R&D that went into the development of these CoilOvers, so it's not just hype. I'm not a big fan of getting the sales by default. I would have much rather seen our product as the go to coil over because they truly are the best one on the market.
Sometimes you end up gaining from the misfortune of others and it is a strange position to be in. Companies like RideTech and BMR are in the middle of exactly that right now. However, having personal and professional hands on experience with the products from both of those companies I can say that their products stand on their own. Options may be fewer today than they were a couple months ago, but the 5th Gen Camaro community still has outstanding suspension and chassis products available from companies that have stood the test of time.

Last edited by Apex Motorsports; 02-25-2014 at 06:11 PM.
Apex Motorsports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2014, 07:27 PM   #84
JusticePete
5th Gen Master Builder

 
JusticePete's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro Justice
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 18,169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firefighter View Post
Believe me I'm convinced you guys worked hard to get these the way you wanted them. As far as sales by default... a sale is a sale is a sale.

One question though. Is there any reason why you didn't use an inverted design? I really liked that about the Pfadts.

Also before today's events I was looking hard at your product. I was waiting to see what people thought of them.

I'm looking to get a set in a couple of months, so there would be plenty of time for reviews to come out.

Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk
There is no need to wait. You can order them today on the RideTech website. http://www.ridetech.com/store/2010-u...hq-series.html
JusticePete is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.