Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
KP Racing
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-01-2009, 10:08 PM   #35
Mike TexaSS
 
Drives: 454 LS7 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 380
My dyno is yours for the tests.
Mike TexaSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2009, 10:23 PM   #36
rodimus prime
Account Suspended
 
Drives: Cargo van.
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Metal Metal Land
Posts: 1,247
I would like to see

New Era Performance
Vararam
Airaid
Late Model Racecraft
Texas Speed
Henessey
rodimus prime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2009, 11:35 PM   #37
HALFFAST
 
HALFFAST's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Chevy Camaro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: CANADA
Posts: 249
say there are 3 brands being tested you just run three seperate dyno test sessions through the day and scramble order the brand is tested for each dyno test session and do an average of results to determine a winner.
__________________
it's my shell I'm the turtle
HALFFAST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2009, 12:36 PM   #38
96rss/ls6
Inferno is the only color
 
96rss/ls6's Avatar
 
Drives: 96 ls6 camaro, iom 2ss/rss /
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: greer south carolina
Posts: 236
Im really feeling this thread! Is K&N gonna get in on this? There is also a intake on ebay thats a true cold air that relocates the winshield washer bottle. Any thoughts?
__________________
96rss/ls6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2009, 03:19 PM   #39
pharmd
Master of Medicine
 
pharmd's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 VW GTI, 2007 TBSS, 2002 Camaro
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Morehead, Kentucky
Posts: 781
If they aren't a major player on this site then forget about them...The vendors that had the fore thought to get on here, listen to the consumer and work hard to deliver a quality product, THEN stay around to make sure it works and the consumer is satisfied are the ones that should be included. The ones that are on here that just hop on occationally to push a new product release then leave should be out also.

Forums are one of if not THE most effective way to advertise a product now-a-days, and shops should IMHO dial back print, radio, tV, newspaper etc advertising and if necessary hire a part-time employee to maintain their web presence.

Nothing is worse than a shop popping on telling about a new product, stirring up excitement, only to leave and not respond to the 50 or so replies the post generated. Those shops that answer posts, PM's and emails AND deliver a quality product are the ones that will succeed at the end of the day anyway.

Just my $0.02 as a fellow business owner.
__________________
pharmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2009, 04:15 PM   #40
UsedTaHaveA68
 
UsedTaHaveA68's Avatar
 
Drives: Hyundai Sonata
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 497
Quote:
Originally Posted by rodimus prime View Post
I would like to see

New Era Performance
Vararam
Airaid
Late Model Racecraft
Texas Speed
Henessey
I'd like to see Fast Lane's added into the mix as well. They had the original "true" CAI for this car, even if it did require removing the washer fluid reservoir. I think it would be a top contender, as the surface area of the NEP filter looks like it might be a little small. I predict Hennessey to do the worst (sorry guys). With the HUGE gap around the tubing on heat shield, you're basically just getting hot air from the radiator blown into the area of the filter. That is, of course, if you spring the extra $100 for the 1.5 square foot piece of sheet metal.

I think this is a great idea, although I think it might be better if it was performed just on a 500rwhp car. The results will be exaggerated over a stock car and easier to quantify (I would think). So those with 100% stock cars, they might not be seeing the exact horsepower they will be gaining, but they can still see which one performs the best.
UsedTaHaveA68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2009, 08:30 PM   #41
Late Model Racecraft
 
Late Model Racecraft's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 C7 + 98 Camaro
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 843
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike TexaSS View Post
My dyno is yours for the tests.
Sound good to me Mike, That way there will be unbiased results. So far no other Cold Air Induction manufacturer has contacted me about this test. We are ready and so is the magazine company. We can do it next week if we can get some other venders involved.
Late Model Racecraft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2009, 12:00 AM   #42
Hennessey Performance
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS RS
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sealy, TX
Posts: 370
We can offer either one of our dynos, dynojet or dyno dynamics. Then after the cars are dyno tested they can go straight down the 1/4 mile at Lonestar. Here is how I suggest it should go down to be fair for all:

1. each car that is tested shows up bone stock with a stock airbox. since the cars will be driven there, allow a 1 hour cool down time for everyone.

2. then each cars goes on to the dyno with the stock airbox in place. 2 dyno pulls are made back to back.

3. then the stock airbox is taken off and the tuner's aftermarket kit is installed. then the next dyno pull is made exactly 30 minutes after the last pull with the stock airbox. 2 pulls are made again.

4. then the car goes straight to the dragstrip and runs the 1/4 mile and then runs it again.

the dyno can be operated by somebody independent. the 1/4 mile is the same for everybody. the temps, heat soak, etc. are the same for everybody. each tuner brings his otherwise stock car and it is dyno tested stock. this keeps everything the same for everybody with the exception of the driver.

quite honestly, if you are looking at the best air induction design vs the worst design, there will be less than a 15 rw hp difference and less than a 2 mph difference in trap speed. and that might be conservative.

anyway, that is how i suggest you do a test with fair, repeatable data. to do it with one car and switch out airboxes will be much harder to have fair results. heat soak will skew the test results.
Hennessey Performance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2009, 12:04 AM   #43
GMtothecore
"That Guy"
 
GMtothecore's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro SS...........what else?
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: OOOOOOOklahoma where the wind comes sweepin' down the plains.
Posts: 2,361
Sounds like a good plan....it'd be cool to check all this out. When does it look like you all will get this together?
__________________
GMtothecore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2009, 12:07 AM   #44
Hennessey Performance
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS RS
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sealy, TX
Posts: 370
FYI, one of our supercharged Camaros ran 11.7 @ 122 mph down the 1/4 mile on factory stock tires with our air intake system. This is the same car that makes 592 rw hp on 91 octane fuel. We made another pass on the same car with a stock airbox and lost nearly 2 mph. Our test data shows that our air induction system works. If others want to run plastic kits or stick with the stock airbox then that is up to them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by UsedTaHaveA68 View Post
I'd like to see Fast Lane's added into the mix as well. They had the original "true" CAI for this car, even if it did require removing the washer fluid reservoir. I think it would be a top contender, as the surface area of the NEP filter looks like it might be a little small. I predict Hennessey to do the worst (sorry guys). With the HUGE gap around the tubing on heat shield, you're basically just getting hot air from the radiator blown into the area of the filter. That is, of course, if you spring the extra $100 for the 1.5 square foot piece of sheet metal.

I think this is a great idea, although I think it might be better if it was performed just on a 500rwhp car. The results will be exaggerated over a stock car and easier to quantify (I would think). So those with 100% stock cars, they might not be seeing the exact horsepower they will be gaining, but they can still see which one performs the best.
Hennessey Performance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2009, 01:41 AM   #45
djsnoflake
Faith Keeper
 
djsnoflake's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Silverado LTZ, 2010 2SS/RS
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada
Posts: 2,764
I would suggest that if possible, someone with some connections gets the GMPP intake also, I know lots of warranty worry warts are interested in it.

Also, only one car should be used. That way no tuner can 'massage' some extra HP out of the deal and also eliminates natural differences between engines. Sometimes one bone stock LS3 can have like an extra 10 HP over another bone stock LS3
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by fbodfather View Post
.........we are far from finished.................
djsnoflake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2009, 02:47 AM   #46
Late Model Racecraft
 
Late Model Racecraft's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 C7 + 98 Camaro
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 843
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hennessey Performance View Post
We can offer either one of our dynos, dynojet or dyno dynamics. Then after the cars are dyno tested they can go straight down the 1/4 mile at Lonestar. Here is how I suggest it should go down to be fair for all:

1. each car that is tested shows up bone stock with a stock airbox. since the cars will be driven there, allow a 1 hour cool down time for everyone.

2. then each cars goes on to the dyno with the stock airbox in place. 2 dyno pulls are made back to back.

3. then the stock airbox is taken off and the tuner's aftermarket kit is installed. then the next dyno pull is made exactly 30 minutes after the last pull with the stock airbox. 2 pulls are made again.

4. then the car goes straight to the dragstrip and runs the 1/4 mile and then runs it again.

the dyno can be operated by somebody independent. the 1/4 mile is the same for everybody. the temps, heat soak, etc. are the same for everybody. each tuner brings his otherwise stock car and it is dyno tested stock. this keeps everything the same for everybody with the exception of the driver.

quite honestly, if you are looking at the best air induction design vs the worst design, there will be less than a 15 rw hp difference and less than a 2 mph difference in trap speed. and that might be conservative.

anyway, that is how i suggest you do a test with fair, repeatable data. to do it with one car and switch out airboxes will be much harder to have fair results. heat soak will skew the test results.


You know I am game John, lets try and get some of the other systems out there to join along in the fun. Dyno and track runs are always fun! I also think we need to ad a 30 mile cruise to prove that no check engine lights will come on from the aftermarket CAI system being installed.
Late Model Racecraft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2009, 08:41 AM   #47
Gentry78
HOOK'EM
 
Gentry78's Avatar
 
Drives: 97 c1500/92 olds
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,280
awesome idea

i really hope all the makers jump on this
Gentry78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2009, 08:46 AM   #48
Gentry78
HOOK'EM
 
Gentry78's Avatar
 
Drives: 97 c1500/92 olds
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by Late Model Racecraft View Post
You know I am game John, lets try and get some of the other systems out there to join along in the fun. Dyno and track runs are always fun! I also think we need to ad a 30 mile cruise to prove that no check engine lights will come on from the aftermarket CAI system being installed.
another great addition
Gentry78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2009, 10:18 AM   #49
Nine Ball


 
Nine Ball's Avatar
 
Drives: 1969 & 2011 Camaro SS
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,846
I will volunteer my abusive driving skills if this takes place at Lone Star.

Tony
Nine Ball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2009, 11:34 AM   #50
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crapramento, Crapifornia
Posts: 13,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gentry78 View Post
awesome idea

i really hope all the makers jump on this


Quote:
Originally Posted by Nine Ball View Post
I will volunteer my abusive driving skills if this takes place at Lone Star.

Tony
__________________
"...What IS true: We anticipated that this would happen - we are never finished - and yes, Ford DOES deserve to win now and then. To think that GM can come out with a car to make ford throw in the towel is simply foolhardy..." - fbodfather
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2009, 04:02 PM   #51
Michael_Js
SoCal C5 Family Member
 
Michael_Js's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS/RS - Black w/IOM; 6M
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 5,306
Send a message via AIM to Michael_Js Send a message via MSN to Michael_Js
Great! Some real numbers to compare before purchasing :-) Installation ease is also a big deal...Great job people!!
Michael_Js is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vararam Ram air system for V-8 and V-6 2010 Camaro sales@vararam.com Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 133 02-21-2013 10:25 PM
1st LMR Production Cold Air Installed and Tuned!! Late Model Racecraft V8 Bolt-Ons & Tunes 7 12-16-2010 11:17 PM
1st LMR Production Cold Air Installed and Tuned!! Late Model Racecraft Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 26 05-24-2009 02:27 PM
Track Results are in for 2010 CAMARO SS w/ cold air intake & ecu tune!! Late Model Racecraft Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 45 05-14-2009 08:23 PM
Another Camaro Magazine Test - Sorry... KJS 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 40 04-21-2009 01:17 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.