Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
autoguy
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Technical Camaro Topics > Suspension / Brakes / Chassis

Suspension / Brakes / Chassis All suspension, brakes and chassis discussions.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-20-2014, 06:40 PM   #51
Suprslo
 
Drives: 2013 SS
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sevierville TN
Posts: 256
Thanks for the updates on the LCA's. These are the last piece of the puzzle for me. I just hope you guys can get them out the door in time for the first LS fest
Suprslo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2014, 03:49 PM   #52
olblue75

 
olblue75's Avatar
 
Drives: Inferno Orange 2SS/RS LS-3
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Qandahar, Afghanistan.
Posts: 991
Availability

Gonna revive the thread an ask for a picture and about availability?? I hope all is going with this new peice?!?!?!
olblue75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2014, 11:11 AM   #53
Suprslo
 
Drives: 2013 SS
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sevierville TN
Posts: 256
I just recieved mine and installed them yesterday. They are a very nice piece however I'm kind of frustrated. I've exchanged emails and phone calls several times with BMR over the past few months trying to get these. Even after a shipping mishap, I finally got them. No big deal. But the instructions start off saying I have to use adjustable toe rods with them. Why didn't anyone say something? I don't care about the money, it's just annoying to finally get my parts and have to wait even more for more parts required for the install.
Suprslo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2014, 11:13 AM   #54
Suprslo
 
Drives: 2013 SS
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sevierville TN
Posts: 256
Here is a picture of the arms. I'll get some pictures if them installed today
Attached Images
 
Suprslo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2014, 11:45 AM   #55
L99CAMA2011


 
L99CAMA2011's Avatar
 
Drives: One of the baddest handling Gen 5s
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Masachusetts
Posts: 2,634
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suprslo View Post
Here is a picture of the arms. I'll get some pictures if them installed today
How much do they weigh each vs the stock.
L99CAMA2011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2014, 11:52 AM   #56
L99CAMA2011


 
L99CAMA2011's Avatar
 
Drives: One of the baddest handling Gen 5s
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Masachusetts
Posts: 2,634
Quote:
Originally Posted by 130R View Post
The sway bar isn't a lever, and doesn't gain mechanical advantage by being longer, in fact, because the stiffness of a sway bar is proportional to its length, they lose stiffness, or become less efficient the longer they are.

The stiffness of a sway bar is also proportional to the 4th power of the diameter, so it's no coincidence that the FE4 rear bars have a larger diameter than the FE3 rear bars.

Sway bars do utilize lever arms at the ends, but once again, these are proportional to their length, which is why the closest hole to the bar is the stiffest setting, and the further out you go, the less efficient they are.

The FE3 bars also appear to have shorter lever arms (more efficient) than the FE4 bars.

So why do people keep posting the FE4 bars are more efficient? Is this just an assumption that bigger/longer is better? Or is there something I'm missing?
The proof is in the pudding. Try putting your finger next to hour thumb straight out vertically and press down with your other finger on your other hand in a perpendicular position then put that same finger further out towards the end of the vertical finger you will notice that the further out the finger pressing down is placed the more effective it is. Yes it is true that the longer the bar the weaker at the end but with a solid or larger diameter hollow bar placed more outboard the more effective. This would also work if we could place the rear shock a tad bit more outward like say .5" or so to still allow tire fitment. The same shock with say a 600lbs spring would be more effective if it was placed more outboard towards the hub.
L99CAMA2011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2014, 12:08 PM   #57
Suprslo
 
Drives: 2013 SS
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sevierville TN
Posts: 256
I didn't weigh them. But they are definitely heavier than stock.
Suprslo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2014, 04:17 PM   #58
Suprslo
 
Drives: 2013 SS
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sevierville TN
Posts: 256
Here is an installed picture. Again these are a very nice piece. I put my factory wheels back on for the time being until I get my toe rods here. I just hope when they get here there isn't another note telling me I need something else for them to work...
Attached Images
 
Suprslo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2014, 09:14 AM   #59
Powhusku

 
Powhusku's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS M6
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Laramie/Cody, WY
Posts: 1,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suprslo View Post
I just recieved mine and installed them yesterday. They are a very nice piece however I'm kind of frustrated. I've exchanged emails and phone calls several times with BMR over the past few months trying to get these. Even after a shipping mishap, I finally got them. No big deal. But the instructions start off saying I have to use adjustable toe rods with them. Why didn't anyone say something? I don't care about the money, it's just annoying to finally get my parts and have to wait even more for more parts required for the install.
Would buying the adjustable LCAs save me the trouble of needing to buy the adjustable toe rods? I already have BMRs non adjustable toe rods.
__________________
Powhusku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2014, 02:20 PM   #60
BMR Sales



 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS R6P
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Seffner, FL
Posts: 2,358
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suprslo View Post
I just recieved mine and installed them yesterday. They are a very nice piece however I'm kind of frustrated. I've exchanged emails and phone calls several times with BMR over the past few months trying to get these. Even after a shipping mishap, I finally got them. No big deal. But the instructions start off saying I have to use adjustable toe rods with them. Why didn't anyone say something? I don't care about the money, it's just annoying to finally get my parts and have to wait even more for more parts required for the install.
Sorry for the confusion on your order. I will say in our defense about the adjustable toe rods, it is impossible to know what each customer has or doesn't have already installed on their cars. And it does say in the description for the TCA028's that they do require adjustable toe rods. But yes, if you called in your order to us, then we should have asked if you had the adjustable toe rods to go with them. If that didn't happen, I do sincerely apologize.
__________________
Keith Kanyuh
5th Gen Camaro Suspension Specialist
keith@bmrsuspension.com
www.bmrsuspension.com
Like us on Facebook!
BMR Sales is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2014, 02:24 PM   #61
BMR Sales



 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS R6P
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Seffner, FL
Posts: 2,358
Quote:
Originally Posted by L99CAMA2011 View Post
How much do they weigh each vs the stock.
I know you got your answer in another thread, but just in case anyone else sees this and is curious....

The stock (OEM) LCA weighs 5.7 lbs.
The TCA028 LCA weighs about 7.0 lbs.

1.3 lbs. per side isn't that bad for the amount of increased structural strength you're getting from these TCA028's.

The TCA029's will probably weigh a pound or two more because of the large chromoly adjuster nut in the middle. Just my guess....didn't have any unboxed to weigh at the time.
__________________
Keith Kanyuh
5th Gen Camaro Suspension Specialist
keith@bmrsuspension.com
www.bmrsuspension.com
Like us on Facebook!
BMR Sales is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2014, 02:25 PM   #62
BMR Sales



 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS R6P
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Seffner, FL
Posts: 2,358
Quote:
Originally Posted by Powhusku View Post
Would buying the adjustable LCAs save me the trouble of needing to buy the adjustable toe rods? I already have BMRs non adjustable toe rods.
And yes, you are correct, with the Adjustable TCA029's, you do not absolutely need the adjustable toe rods. Nice to have....Yes!!! But required....No.
__________________
Keith Kanyuh
5th Gen Camaro Suspension Specialist
keith@bmrsuspension.com
www.bmrsuspension.com
Like us on Facebook!
BMR Sales is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2014, 06:52 PM   #63
Suprslo
 
Drives: 2013 SS
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sevierville TN
Posts: 256
Kieth, no problem man. You've been a big help. I'm actually installing my toe rods I just got from you right now. I'm almost done with the install.
Suprslo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2014, 06:55 PM   #64
Suprslo
 
Drives: 2013 SS
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sevierville TN
Posts: 256
I was a little worried about lowering the cradle but as you can see in the pic, it's not that bad. Thanks again Keith!
Attached Images
 
Suprslo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2014, 06:29 AM   #65
94guy

 
94guy's Avatar
 
Drives: 99 Camaro; 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: louisiana
Posts: 1,444
anyone having issues with the new revised arms on a 1" drop and 17" welds??
__________________
10.21@138
RWHP JRE TUNING Whipple supercharged
94guy is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.