|
View Poll Results: How do u feel about AFM? | |||
Like it. | 20 | 16.67% | |
Would buy a Std Trans if can not get the Auto w/o AFM | 9 | 7.50% | |
Given the choice of w/AFM or w/out would choose w/out | 46 | 38.33% | |
Given the choice of w/AFM or w/out would choose with | 3 | 2.50% | |
W/out a choice would/will pay extra to have it removed | 5 | 4.17% | |
Have removed AFM and like it. | 19 | 15.83% | |
Have removed AFM and wish u hadn't | 0 | 0% | |
Have or will tune it out, even if no power train Warranty | 18 | 15.00% | |
Voters: 120. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
09-14-2010, 03:24 AM | #29 |
Drives: 2018 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Lake Stevens
Posts: 1,005
|
Had I known how afm really worked, I would have bought a manual. This needs to be toggle on/off capable.
|
09-20-2010, 03:56 PM | #30 |
Drives: 2011 Victory Red Auto 2SS Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: West Tn
Posts: 628
|
Wondering why those 13 that voted for liking AFM, did so. Possible better gas mileage or don't notice it operating?
Only about 16% like it and of those 2 appear to not be driving a Camaro SS . And some of those who don't will or have disabled it even tho it invalidates the warranty. |
09-20-2010, 04:33 PM | #31 | |
ARMY of one.
Drives: 2011 Black SS/RS Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Houston Tx. from Lafayette La.
Posts: 823
|
Quote:
As far as that pic. I can post one tomorrow with 58 on it if you like.... Also I have the A6 and 29 is not possible unless you are going down hill or hit the reset and coast...
__________________
|
|
09-20-2010, 05:37 PM | #32 | |
Drives: SUMMIT WHITE 2SS/RS CAMARO Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 2018: Lakewood Ranch, Fl.
Posts: 8,116
|
Quote:
Not to jack this thread but I'll say it again, I don't think so. I came back from Boston (sox game) PM last light, and on I-90 between 70 & 75 MPH I averaged 25.1 MPG- An all time high for my 8800 mile 2SS A6. When I got my car last year the best I could do was 22.4 MPG with the cruise set @ 70 MPH for one hour. Again, sorry for the jack.
__________________
|
|
09-21-2010, 11:14 AM | #33 |
Comic Curmudgeon
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS-2010 VW CC Sport Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Near Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,395
|
Geez, I was able to sustain just under 24 mpg on a recent trip my wife and I took with Rosie a couple of weeks ago. This was a five state cruise mostly interstate and some extensive city driving. So, I wouldn't discount higher mpg numbers with a light gas pedal use en route. (And Yes I realize, it isn't comparable to my LS3 - Manual) But in the end, if I had to drive this car every day for work, I would have an L99 Auto.
Now, about the AFM deal, you gotta ask yourself whether or not you would rather pay a hefty Gas Guzzler tax when you buy the car. I recently looked at a Challenger SRT8 and fell over when I saw the $1700 guzzler tax and a hwy rating of 19 mpg. All I could say was ouch!!!!! Not sure why one would feel "embarassed" by the sound of their exhaust. Never paid much attention to that when I am going 65 mph. Someone running next to your car making faces at the sound???????
__________________
Member Illinois Camaro Club
His Name is Rosie - "Speak Softly and Carry a Big Stick!" - If you know who said that, then you know the genesis of his name. |
09-21-2010, 11:19 AM | #34 |
Tuned mine out under 65mph, I like it that way for freeway driving~72-75mph
|
|
09-21-2010, 02:52 PM | #35 | |
Drives: 2011 Victory Red Auto 2SS Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: West Tn
Posts: 628
|
Quote:
Not convinced that AFM would cause the MPG to drop below 19 or what ever the threshold is. We also lost 25hp because of the Auto. |
|
09-21-2010, 03:29 PM | #36 |
v It bites.
Drives: 2011 IBM 2SS/RS Join Date: May 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 3,585
|
AFM is not terrible when everything is stock, but at times it does feel sluggish. Even with an axleback exhaust I notice it now, but that problem goes away when I blare my music the way I do...
I will hold off on the tune until I get headers...knock it out during the dyno tune I suppose.. I guess it is a great concept if it had been done a little more precise with less issues...or only activating above 50-60 mph...but again, didn't notice it when I was stock as far as sound goes..
__________________
2011 2SS/RS
Performance: 439 RWHP: 226/236 Comp Cam, Kooks 1-7/8, CAInc, Borla S type, Vmax TB, Rx Catch Can, Trans cooler, SLP 160 termo, Melling high volume, Eibach Springs/Sways 1" drop, Whiteline complete bushing kit. |
09-21-2010, 07:40 PM | #37 |
09-22-2010, 02:47 AM | #38 |
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS (M6) 427 Twin Turbo Join Date: May 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,090
|
i never noticed it untill i installed a Borla s-type catback
i love the sound of the exhaust but when AFM Kicks in eventually i plan on having it tuned out
__________________
2011 Camaro 2SS/RS ERL 427 M6 TT -AGP Twin Turbo 55/57 .83ar | ERL 427ci | Squash Fuel System | Stainless Works Chambered 3" | Mcleod RXT | Factory Hurst Short Throw | Black Forgestar F14s | CTS V 6 Piston Brembo | VIS AMS Carbon Fiber Hood | Anvil Carbon Fiber Spoiler |
09-22-2010, 03:01 AM | #39 |
Drives: 99 Z28 CONV and 2010 SS Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: ORLANDO
Posts: 54
|
AFM has to go or at least have a turn off switch. I can feel it kicking on and of around town. At 35MPH, if I give the car a little gas, it actually slows down 1 MPH...sort of like an older carburator car with too big a carb on it. I do get 26.1 MPG at 70MPH on the flat Florida highways....but this goes down to 12 MPG in the city....with easy driving. Not what I got the car for.
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Do you want the Z28? | ChrisB | Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics | 1616 | 09-04-2010 11:49 PM |
Camaro5 invites you to say thanks to Camaro assemblers and tour the Martinrea plant! | Hylton | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 646 | 12-23-2009 03:41 PM |
Camaro ls3 news...true or false? | Dark Knight | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 74 | 06-05-2008 05:29 PM |
Active Fuel Management? | MJA03 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 41 | 01-09-2008 02:25 PM |