Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Chevy Camaro vs...


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-09-2009, 01:18 PM   #113
GatorBlue371

 
GatorBlue371's Avatar
 
Drives: vrooooom vrooooom
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss1129 View Post
Except dollar for dollar the Camaro would beat the living snot out of a rx8. It creams it in the 1/4 and 0-60 and isnt far behind in the handling aspects for a car weighing close to 4000lbs. Of course Im talking about the ss though...who really races a 6 cylinder Camaro? Besides isnt a maxed out rx8 about 30k anyways?
handling the camaro does not come close
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."
GatorBlue371 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2009, 01:49 PM   #114
ss1129
Account Suspended
 
Drives: IOM 2010 2ss
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: hannibal
Posts: 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatorBlue371 View Post
handling the camaro does not come close
Please. The new Camaro weighs 800lbs more and is only 3mph slower through the slalom and dead equal in latteral acceleration.....all while being about 1.5 sec quicker to 60, at least 1 second quicker in the 1/4 mile and stops from 60-0 in 17 feet quicker.



Not close. Do you believe everything you type? Do you ever post any facts or do you just guess because its from Nippon Mart it must be better?
ss1129 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2009, 02:05 PM   #115
snizzle
Recalled user
 
snizzle's Avatar
 
Drives: '12 Camaro SS, '18 Colorado Z71
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 3,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss1129 View Post
Please. The new Camaro weighs 800lbs more and is only 3mph slower through the slalom and dead equal in latteral acceleration.....all while being about 1.5 sec quicker to 60, at least 1 second quicker in the 1/4 mile and stops from 60-0 in 17 feet quicker.

Not close. Do you believe everything you type? Do you ever post any facts or do you just guess because its from Nippon Mart it must be better?
Aren't we talking about the V6 though?

I agree the SS would be an embarrassing comparison.

Also, you can gather facts from multiple locations and make any car look worse than it is.
snizzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2009, 02:09 PM   #116
snizzle
Recalled user
 
snizzle's Avatar
 
Drives: '12 Camaro SS, '18 Colorado Z71
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 3,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss1129 View Post
Except dollar for dollar the Camaro would beat the living snot out of a rx8. It creams it in the 1/4 and 0-60 and isnt far behind in the handling aspects for a car weighing close to 4000lbs. Of course Im talking about the ss though...who really races a 6 cylinder Camaro? Besides isnt a maxed out rx8 about 30k anyways?
Did you read the title? Again, V6 camaro vs RX8. As in 6 cylinders, not 8.

Isn't a V6 maxed out over 30K as well? So yeah, fair comparison.
snizzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2009, 02:16 PM   #117
ss1129
Account Suspended
 
Drives: IOM 2010 2ss
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: hannibal
Posts: 77
How did I make the rx8 look worse? All I said was that an ss could keep up in the handling department with the rx8.....which by the numbers appear to be factual. Plus the rx8 and 1ss can be had for about the same price.

I say 6 cyl Camaro vs RX8 is a drivers race.
ss1129 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2009, 02:17 PM   #118
ss1129
Account Suspended
 
Drives: IOM 2010 2ss
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: hannibal
Posts: 77
Well it appears the 0-60 is identical for both cars. Im still going to say drivers race.
ss1129 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2009, 06:05 PM   #119
GatorBlue371

 
GatorBlue371's Avatar
 
Drives: vrooooom vrooooom
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss1129 View Post
Please. The new Camaro weighs 800lbs more and is only 3mph slower through the slalom and dead equal in latteral acceleration.....all while being about 1.5 sec quicker to 60, at least 1 second quicker in the 1/4 mile and stops from 60-0 in 17 feet quicker.



Not close. Do you believe everything you type? Do you ever post any facts or do you just guess because its from Nippon Mart it must be better?
there is a big difference between the camaro being able to hang with the car around corners, and feeling like a boat in comparison.

You go drive the camaro, then drive the Rx-8 and then say they have comparable handling.
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."
GatorBlue371 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2009, 06:09 PM   #120
Camaro_Corvette
36.58625, -121.7568
 
Camaro_Corvette's Avatar
 
Drives: Team 1LE
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,709
Quote:
Originally Posted by scifisteve View Post
I had a RX8 6spd . Very nimble. Rotary motor made it more like the dirt bike car. Rev it up and go.
RX8 ,very little toqure and bad on gas (13to15mpg ), keep a quart of oil for about every 4th fill up and small gas tank.
I am sure you will like driving the Camaro better.
Hard to say about the cornering. The RX8 Can really go through the turns but funny powerband.
Camaro...Camaro....Search your feelings, you know this to be true. The RX8 is so whenever it came out the Camaro is NOW.
Yeah, whats the deal with the fuel mileage on that thing. I thought the wankle motor or rotary was supposed to be extremely efficient?
__________________
I am seriously never serious vv V vv Next order of business
Camaro_Corvette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2009, 06:12 PM   #121
GatorBlue371

 
GatorBlue371's Avatar
 
Drives: vrooooom vrooooom
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,375
Nope LOL , horrible milage
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."
GatorBlue371 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2009, 07:57 PM   #122
snizzle
Recalled user
 
snizzle's Avatar
 
Drives: '12 Camaro SS, '18 Colorado Z71
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 3,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by camaro_corvette View Post
Yeah, whats the deal with the fuel mileage on that thing. I thought the wankle motor or rotary was supposed to be extremely efficient?
Efficient in what sense?

Fuel mileage is not the selling point. To get 232 HP out of a tiny engine, there's your efficiency I suppose. The size of the engine also helps the RX8 handle best in class.

Fuel mileage is being addressed in the next iteration of the renesis by DI. I'm guessing by the time car manufactures have to meet the new fuel mileage requirements (2020?), you won't see the rotary or V8s anymore.
snizzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2009, 01:40 PM   #123
ConceptVBS
 
Drives: POS
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: iraq
Posts: 74
RX8 owns the 'maro in the handling department. Its got perfect 50/50 weight distribution and is VERY nimble on its feet. However, the 'maro will edge out the RX8 in the power department (maybe slightly) Plus the RX8 is HORRIBLE in gas mileage. Did I mention HORRIBLE?
ConceptVBS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2009, 02:36 PM   #124
GatorBlue371

 
GatorBlue371's Avatar
 
Drives: vrooooom vrooooom
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConceptVBS View Post
RX8 owns the 'maro in the handling department. Its got perfect 50/50 weight distribution and is VERY nimble on its feet. However, the 'maro will edge out the RX8 in the power department (maybe slightly) Plus the RX8 is HORRIBLE in gas mileage. Did I mention HORRIBLE?
Rx-8 > V6 Camaro
Handling
Stock track performance
Redline
Weight/Weight Distrobution

V6 Camaro > Rx-8
Fuel Mileage
Appearance (owning a new car vs. owning a car that has been out for some time)
Upkeep
Power (though that doesn't translate into adv. straight line speed)
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."
GatorBlue371 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2009, 06:21 PM   #125
levi1922

 
levi1922's Avatar
 
Drives: 2LT RS CGM
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,378
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatorBlue371 View Post
Rx-8 > V6 Camaro
Handling
Stock track performance
Redline
Weight/Weight Distrobution

V6 Camaro > Rx-8
Fuel Mileage
Appearance (owning a new car vs. owning a car that has been out for some time)
Upkeep
Power (though that doesn't translate into adv. straight line speed)
the camaro also has an advantage over the rx8 being 5k cheaper for a base one, and then the r3 Rx8 costing more than the 1SS
yes i know you cant "feel" this when you drive, but, just thought id throw that out there since price is an issue in just about every comparison
__________________
levi1922 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2009, 08:17 AM   #126
snizzle
Recalled user
 
snizzle's Avatar
 
Drives: '12 Camaro SS, '18 Colorado Z71
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 3,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by levi1922 View Post
the camaro also has an advantage over the rx8 being 5k cheaper for a base one, and then the r3 Rx8 costing more than the 1SS
yes i know you cant "feel" this when you drive, but, just thought id throw that out there since price is an issue in just about every comparison
This is true, but you'll never find a stripped base model most likely. Add on the options, in both cases, and you're up to 30K easy.
snizzle is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Songs About Camaros (for your driving pleasure) Emjay 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 74 12-18-2014 12:42 AM
GM memo to dealers Moose 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 41 02-04-2010 07:33 PM
CNN: Camaro: From sketchpad to street - The rebirth of a muscle car ... Gatecrasher 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 49 10-05-2009 03:33 PM
UPCOMING CAMARO IMPORTANT DATES CamaroScotty 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 125 01-11-2009 12:31 AM
Camaro Accessories from SEMA FenwickHockey65 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 1 11-03-2008 02:25 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.