Whipple Dyno Sheet, Stock Bottom End!

[Whipped416]

ok well thats your problem and why your numbers are higher.. lots of ppl have this same dyno and i think they are good , just not a loaded dyno like a mustang that produce close to a load on road conditions..
just remember dyno numbers are for show, and track times are for the dough!

[JLE58]

There are alot more shops using a dynojet dyno than a mustang dyno and dyno jet numbers have always been the standard numbers to go by.

[Chris-HPS]

Just to clear the this up, I was joking about my comment. Another member posted it was impossible to make over 700rwhp on 10psi in one of my threads. I am quite sure that you made the power you did. The air is getting ALOT better with fall around the corner and the power will go up. Heck we picked up over 30rwhp from 3 weeks ago to yesterday on a turbo car we just completed @ the same boost level.

Again congrats on the power. I am sure its a blast to drive.

Chris

[victoryred1ss]

Numbers and time slips look good man. I guess you need to go 8's with 1200rwhp before Whipped416 is impressed

[Chris-HPS]

Originally Posted by Whipped416

ok well thats your problem and why your numbers are higher.. lots of ppl have this same dyno and i think they are good , just not a loaded dyno like a mustang that produce close to a load on road conditions..
just remember dyno numbers are for show, and track times are for the dough!

There are differetn dyno jets out there as well. For instance, the newer dyno jets have ALOT smaller rollers and do not weigh anything. My dyno is the older Dyno Jet 248 which has the 48in. roller and is within a few hundred pounds of a average stock weight vehicle so I have alot more load on mine vs. the newer non-loaded dyno's.

Chris

[boostedyards86]

Originally Posted by Chris-HPS

There are differetn dyno jets out there as well. For instance, the newer dyno jets have ALOT smaller rollers and do not weigh anything. My dyno is the older Dyno Jet 248 which has the 48in. roller and is within a few hundred pounds of a average stock weight vehicle so I have alot more load on mine vs. the newer non-loaded dyno's.

Chris

Chris no worries I felt your sarcasm through my computer

[ToddB]

Originally Posted by boostedyards86

Chris no worries I felt your sarcasm through my computer

LMFAO

[Whipped416]

i am impressed very nice build!! numbers are numbers and thats all they are..
nice build goodluck with future mods.

[blackonblacksls]

Originally Posted by Whipped416

ok well thats your problem and why your numbers are higher.. lots of ppl have this same dyno and i think they are good , just not a loaded dyno like a mustang that produce close to a load on road conditions..
just remember dyno numbers are for show, and track times are for the dough!

The car is over 4k lbs and traps 132mph? That taks a lot of power.

You don't have a lot of experience or a lot to compare this to? Do you?

[Whipped416]

i trapped 139 and ran 10.6... 1.97 60 foot with 20 inch stock wheels... (830rwhp 838rwtq) no traction at all up to 90 mph..
so i know 132 is going fast!

[Whipped416]

also shifting at 6200 due to NW102 TB closing and setting rev limited at 6300.

[BlownChevy]

Nice work! Gotta love BOOST!

[UNRIVALED SS]

boosted, the power is awesome. Keep us posted on the longevity of the stock internals. On a side note. To the poster that mentioned breaks the diff. What power level were you at? I'm curious to see how long mine will last.

[Oxtar41]

Originally Posted by Whipped416

also there is no point in spinning it that high of rpms.. there is no power left up there why not shift gears and hit your power band??? makes since huh ?

dafuq? look at the graph it makes peak power at 7200.