08-19-2013, 11:38 PM | #15 | |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT M6 Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,256
|
Quote:
1) Gas mileage is not bad as long as you keep out of the gas. I would average right at 18 for my driving. I get around 16 with my GTO now. 2) I just used regular. Mine was not tuned for it so no need to run it. 3) I only got bored with the auto which is why I have a manual GTO now. As for the one being sluggish, there was either something wrong with it or you drove a V6. |
|
08-20-2013, 01:45 AM | #16 | |
Casual Camaro Owner
Drives: 2010 Black LS V6 Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jacksonville Fl
Posts: 1,090
|
Quote:
|
|
08-20-2013, 09:23 AM | #17 | |
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Quote:
|
|
08-20-2013, 09:28 AM | #18 | |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT M6 Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,256
|
Quote:
You can get a great deal on them so if you have to have a new car go for the Charger but be prepared to get zilch on trade in. That is the perils of a car that has a 60-70% fleet rate. I was looking at buying a 2012 R/T before I bought the GTO so Im not just shooting from the hip. I passed on the Charger because of the above things. I still like the way they look in certain colors but it just wasnt the sporty feeling car for me. Now, if you are talking about the V6/8speed its a different story. Charger all the way. Charger V6>G8 V6. G8 GT>Charger R/T |
|
08-20-2013, 09:31 AM | #19 | |
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Quote:
Whoa, your facts, particularly about the fleet sales, are totally off...... |
|
08-20-2013, 09:48 AM | #20 | |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT M6 Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,256
|
Quote:
http://www.nada.com/b2b/NADAOutlook/...-Industry.aspx 2011 it was 41% and that was just RENTAL fleet sales. I tried to find some more recent info but that is it. However, in 2010 Dodge's fleet sales were 58% of the companies sales. Not good. Dodge has the stats of a RWD R/T at 14.0@99. The G8 was 13.8@101. Like I said, mostly a drivers race. Also, like I said, the Road and Track model is a little faster than the base R/T. If you show me a bone stock Charger R/T with a 13.2 I can show you the fastest bone stock G8 GT at 13.3. As far as the BMW comment, the G8 was compared with the 5 series as well. |
|
08-20-2013, 09:55 AM | #21 | |
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Quote:
http://www.allpar.com/news/index.php...r-july-results Oh, and I actually LOVE the G8 GT and when it came out it rocked the industry as much as the 300C did in 05, but it is 5 years later and as much as the 300 is outdated, so now is the G8, as will the current Charger be when the get refreshed for 15 which BTW WILL include the 8 speed auto across the board.... |
|
08-20-2013, 10:10 AM | #22 | |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT M6 Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,256
|
Quote:
Also, go to any Charger forum and you will see as high as 14.2s in a NEW R/T. Im failing to see where anything I said performance wise was wrong, in fact, you just admitted it. I never mentioned anything about the AWD because the OP asked about the G8 which is only available in RWD. Apples to oranges there. Look, I said it was a drivers race and you chimed in saying that its not even close yet its a complete drivers race. 361HP 6 speed vs 370HP 5 speed. 3860 vs 4250. How that is not a drivers race is completely beyond my comprehension. My G8 ran 8.89 completely bone stock in the 1/8. That is 13.9. With all season tires. I installed a CAI and axle backs and then promptly ran 8.69/13.3 the next week. As I said, I was looking at purchasing a new Charger R/T in 2011. Yet, I didnt. I miss spoke earlier when I said I bought a GTO instead of the Charger. Had my car time lines messed up. I ended up with a G8 GT. I listed my reasons why I didnt purchase a R/T for the OP to see. And yes, the '15 will HOPEFULLY have the 8 speed. We still dont know. That is over a year away. EDIT:Just found where the stock G8 GT record is now 12.9@109.4 at Cecil. In fact, there are only two GTs that are over 14s and both are at high altitudes. Most of the G8s run between 13.8 to 13.3 with quite a few lower than that. Of course, DA probably is a big factor. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...WLUY1QkE#gid=0 Last edited by bballr4567; 08-20-2013 at 10:23 AM. |
|
08-20-2013, 10:26 AM | #23 | |
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Quote:
|
|
08-20-2013, 10:35 AM | #24 | |
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Quote:
|
|
08-20-2013, 10:39 AM | #25 | ||
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT M6 Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,256
|
Quote:
Quote:
Look, you are straight up agreeing with me that the Charger is a drivers race with the G8 GT now. Yet, you first said that I was completely wrong and that the Charger was much faster with 13.2s being turned in. I stand behind the fleet sales. The Charger is available in both rental fleets AND special service fleets. A potential owner needs to know that fact as it does damage resell value which is why you can get such great deals on them new. |
||
08-20-2013, 10:45 AM | #26 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT M6 Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,256
|
Well, I must apologize. It was not stock. The data input was probably wrong. The car ran a 13.38@104.5 completely stock. That is the fastest STOCK G8 GT time.
|
08-20-2013, 10:51 AM | #27 | |
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Quote:
|
|
08-20-2013, 10:55 AM | #28 |
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
|
|
|