08-18-2009, 10:20 PM | #1 |
Drives: Black 02 Z28 Vert Sold Join Date: May 2009
Location: McDonough, GA
Posts: 32
|
Automobile Magazine's "Camaro SS vs Mustang GT w/ Track Pack" on Road Course
Pretty intersting write up and great comparisons starting on page 3 with numerical results on page 8. Thought some of you would enjoy.
http://www.automobilemag.com/feature...ies/index.html |
08-19-2009, 06:29 AM | #2 |
Drives: 2004 Z06 Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorktown, VA
Posts: 192
|
Good read but it seemed like a lot of Mustang nut hugging was going on. After reading page 4, I thought for sure the Mustang was gonna run away victorious but then you look at page 8 and the Camaro handily beats almost every category except some cornering g's categories, which even then are still very close. Scary to think what this car would do to a non track pack GT.
__________________
2004 Corvette Z06
1996 Camaro 3.8L (M5) |
08-19-2009, 07:28 AM | #3 |
Account Suspended
Drives: Thunderbird Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 951
|
The opposite holds just as true, what is a Track Pack Mustang with 400hpgoing to do to the Camaro SS? Like I said in another thread, .7 seconds is a surprisingly small gap considering the huge gap in power between the two cars, the gap in mid range torque is particularly noteworthy. If handling between these two models was on remotely the same level the Camaro should positively run off and hide from the Mustang, to the tune of several seconds. That this does not occur tells you that the Camaro is not and likely was not intended to be a true GT and indeed does slant more heavily toward the muscle car side of the equation.
The Camaro deserves credit for a very good powerplant and great brakes, but stellar handling was obviously not a developmental hot button for the Chevy. Nothing wrong with that, many a classic muscle car was built on the same principle and to lesser effect. That said, you have to expect people who drive race cars for a living to prefer the car with the bend toward great handling, which is hwt we see here. Different strokes for different folks. |
08-19-2009, 08:15 AM | #4 | |
Drives: 2004 Z06 Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorktown, VA
Posts: 192
|
Quote:
1. A 400 hp Mustang does NOT exist yet. 2. 0.7 seconds is nothing? Did you look at any other performance category or did you only focus on the ones convenient to you? Are you gonna be driving the two cars in a road track 100% of the time? Look at the numbers that really matter in day to day driving. It is NOT EVEN CLOSE. 3. Why do people keep bringing up the "for a car with so and so less HP it does well". Who the hell cares? It is not all about hp, it is about hp/lb. The Mustang does well because it is lighter, true. We shall see how heavy a new 400 hp Mustang is, until then I don't really care to discuss imaginary cars.
__________________
2004 Corvette Z06
1996 Camaro 3.8L (M5) |
|
08-19-2009, 08:29 AM | #5 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: Thunderbird Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 951
|
Quote:
2. Who said .7 second was nothing? I did say it is an amazingly small gap between two car which are supposed to be in the same segment with a greater than 100hp disparity between the two, because it is. We already knew the Camaro was notably faster in a straight line, this simply proves that the Chevy is more of a cruiser than a corner carver. But then, we knew that already too. Like I said earlier there is nothing wrong with that, it just is what it is. 3. I find it amazingly easy to tell just how disappointed Chevy enthusiasts actually are in the curb weight of the new Camaro SS by how 'touchy' they become about the weight of the new 400hp Mustang GT. This extreme weight gain you guys keep hoping will hinder the new Mustang GT just isn't going to happen, there simply exists no plausible reason why anything like this would occur. |
|
08-19-2009, 09:39 AM | #6 | |
Drives: 2010 LPE 650+ CTS-V Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 1,640
|
Quote:
You say the Camaro is more of a cruiser than a corner carver but it still runs faster through the course?? If I were looking at it and I saw the Camaro had faster lap times, faster straight line and a shorter stopping distance then my conclusion is that it is a better car all around. Not taking anything away from the Mustang but until the "so-called" 400hp engine comes out, it will not turn out the way the Mustang faithfuls want it too!! |
|
08-19-2009, 09:48 AM | #7 | |
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Quote:
|
|
08-19-2009, 09:54 AM | #8 | |
Drives: 94 camaro z28 Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: bay area, ca
Posts: 31
|
Quote:
Look, if in 2011 the mustang is faster, then great for ford. Lets wait and see instead of racing hypothetical cars. Maybe the ford will gain weight, maybe it wont. I heard rumors the 5.0 liter wont be in the gt, but a higher tier mustang and the gt would have the turbo v6. I also heard rumors the v8 wont have 400 horsepower. We wont know untill 2010 what the 2011 mustang will be like. Maybe the camaro will get a more agressive tuned suspension, as its current setup is kinda conservitive. Who knows what will happen. Bottom line, right now the camaro is faster than the mustang, stop making excuses. If we do this again in 2011, and the mustang is faster, i will give you the courtesy of admitting it and not constantly making excuses. The camaro is not the better cruiser, as it outran the mustang on a road course, NOT THE DRAG STRIP. Its the better performance car. |
|
08-19-2009, 09:59 AM | #9 | |
Drives: 2010 LPE 650+ CTS-V Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 1,640
|
Quote:
|
|
08-19-2009, 10:06 AM | #10 | ||||||
Account Suspended
Drives: Thunderbird Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 951
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
GM better have something amazing up their sleeve, because the Camaro is going to need nearly Z06 level power to hold it's own against a 400hp/400lb-ft tq Mustang GT. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
In terms of handling the Camaro is a let down, no plainer way to state it. |
||||||
08-19-2009, 10:16 AM | #11 |
Blessed
Drives: 2013 Sonic RS MT Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saint Augustine FL
Posts: 28,444
|
Keep it clean gentlemen.
I'm sorry but we have very little patience for conversations that we've hashed out over and over again. I liked the article also. I'm glad the Camaro out performed the Mustang but I'm bummed that it wasn't as much fun to drive... GM really needs to fix that understeer... If they do, the camaro would have walked away from the mustang as they could have maintined higher speeds through the corners. When the 400hp mustang hits the streets it will be a much different competition... GM will HAVE to fix the understeer or the new mustang might have enough to beat it... MHO.
__________________
Click image to see build thread. PQ - "the love of cars. It's a boys first step toward manhood and a mans last hold on boyhood." Fbodfather - "We do not want to use the Z28 moniker on a car that does not deserve this hallowed name." The_Blur - "Let's not confuse competitors with equals." |
08-19-2009, 10:23 AM | #12 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: Thunderbird Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 951
|
Quote:
The whole 'my car is better at everything even when it isn't' angle just gets tired. Camaro is really good at some things, not so great at others. If GM is discussing any fixes for the issues the car does have I am as interested as anybody else to hear them. Obvious Camaro problems: Understeer is a mother and you cannot change line at speed once in a corner without losing even more speed, due at least partially to the former. Obvious Mustang problems: Brake fade comes in fast and hard, 315hp isn't cutting it, a problem which really shows up in the mid range. If I were calling he shots needed to fix the Camaro I wouldn't even touch the engine. Issues I would look at would be... 1: Can the gearing be fine tuned any further to improve acceleration and or fuel economy even a little? Neither area is bad, but more never hurts and BMW and Porsche have made a literal living by making cars go faster than the power ratings would suggest that they should. How? They tweak the gearing until it is genuinely perfect. 2: Where can we drop some weight. It is possible that meaningful weight loss cannot be had, but it never hurts to try. 3: Obviously, tweak the suspension heavily. Adjust rear spring rates, chage tire size, but solve the understeer issue. Car needs to be more nuetral all the way through the corner. |
|
08-19-2009, 11:02 AM | #13 | |
Drives: Dodge Ram Megacab & Cobalt SS Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Boise
Posts: 1,536
|
Quote:
|
|
08-19-2009, 12:20 PM | #14 |
Drives: 2006 Silverado SS, 2009 G8 GT Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: PNW
Posts: 13,313
|
It was a good read thats for sure. Points out the strength and weaknesses of both cars. There is one paragraph that really stuck out to me and gives us Camaro lovers a nice glimpse of hope even though the Mustang "has higher grip".
"The Mustang eats the Camaro alive in midcorner but never threatens to get by. "the only way I could pass him" jones acknowledges "is if he makes a mistake-or I dont mind bruising a door." But vastly superior tourque allows the Camaro to pull clear on acceleration. And on the fast corners in the last segment of the circuit and honking down the front straight, the Camaro runs away and hides" |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OFFICIAL 2010 Camaro Specifications (full tech specs PDF inside) | Tran | Guides, Manuals, Bulletins, Documentation Archive | 394 | 06-11-2010 06:16 PM |
2010 camaro SS vs. 2010 Mustang GT/Track Package | Devil-eyes | Chevy Camaro vs... | 57 | 03-17-2009 07:30 PM |
New Shelby Mustang revealed as race-only 'R Model' | Sizzox | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 4 | 01-30-2009 09:12 PM |
Edmunds: 2010 Ford Mustang First Look | Scotsman | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 32 | 11-23-2008 09:55 PM |