04-26-2010, 01:53 PM | #29 |
Petro-sexual
|
If you're looking for the ultimate in SC power, you're probably right on track. Whether-or-not the twin screws can show the centrifugals up remains to be seen, but the newer ones show promise.
I suggest Procharger as an alterative, too, in that case... |
04-26-2010, 01:58 PM | #30 |
Drives: 2015 1SS RS 1LE Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 772
|
And there goes another thread
The one thing I can say is this: You cant please everyone, and the argument will NEVER change. There are plenty of 750-900 RWHP guys out there, just because they do not waive their flags on the forums does not mean they do not exist. There is a reason we are the #1 supercharger manufacture, some say it is because we were first to market, some say it is our marketing, and some say it is the quality product. I say it is all of the above in conjunction with an awesome customer following, and great CUSTOMER SUPPORT. We could not be who we are without the automotive community, it is each of you that has helped us become #1. We appreciate each and everyone of you Now, back to work building the best supercharger system on the market |
04-26-2010, 02:05 PM | #31 |
Drives: 2010 SS Camaro Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 42
|
BlownChevy, are you with Magnacharger? I'm asking because I want to know if there are any Maggies that put out over 900rwhp, I'm interested because I may want one, not because I'm being a d**k, someone said that there was.
__________________
2010 SS Camaro/6.2L-V8
Magnaflow Competition Series Axle-Back, Vararam Air Intake, Black bow ties, tinted tailights and side lights and reverse lights, Blacked out head lights, brushed super sport fuel door, blacked out SS logos front and rear. Boss 339 Black Rims with Red Bezel. Next: American Racing Headers, Vengeance Stage III Cam. Red halos Last: Vortech V-7ysi Supercharger, Body kit |
04-26-2010, 02:13 PM | #32 |
Petro-sexual
|
I've only found information up to a little more than 800 RWHP; it sounded like it was more a problem with belt slipage than anything, but unless a person is looking for more than all-out power, I still think this is a great choice. Can anyone really use 800+ RWHP on the street anyways? No. It's cool to say that you have it though
|
04-26-2010, 02:22 PM | #33 |
Drives: 2010 SS Camaro Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 42
|
Alrighty then, that's all I wanted to know, hope nobody got offended because no offense or suggestives intended. I own neither a Vortech nor a Magnacharger, which is why I asked the question, for some research by owners of the products. Hooah
__________________
2010 SS Camaro/6.2L-V8
Magnaflow Competition Series Axle-Back, Vararam Air Intake, Black bow ties, tinted tailights and side lights and reverse lights, Blacked out head lights, brushed super sport fuel door, blacked out SS logos front and rear. Boss 339 Black Rims with Red Bezel. Next: American Racing Headers, Vengeance Stage III Cam. Red halos Last: Vortech V-7ysi Supercharger, Body kit |
04-26-2010, 03:50 PM | #34 |
Drives: 2015 1SS RS 1LE Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 772
|
The power can be made with the proper supporting hardware. If you are serious about making the power, Kenny Duttweiler has done it.
|
04-26-2010, 04:27 PM | #35 |
Petro-sexual
|
He got pretty close to 1000 HP.
|
04-26-2010, 04:47 PM | #36 |
Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Clarkesville , GEORGIA
Posts: 1,859
|
I love seeing the manufacturers getting involved on the forums. Thanks to you guys.
|
04-26-2010, 04:59 PM | #37 |
Drives: 2002 Dodge Viper Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Alamogordo NM
Posts: 4
|
There is more then one way to skin a cat.
But IMO It's not PEEK power #'s that make a car fast, or fun to drive on the street. It's the average power it makes across the RPM range. Here are Dyno charts from 2 Camaros making close to the same power, Both stock 6.2L bottom ends. Both running 9psi, both having a blower cam, both having header, The Magi car had ported heads the Vortec car did not. The Magi, TVS2300 dyno And the Vortec Dyno At 2500 rpm the Magi Car is making 580 ft/lb of TQ and 280 HP The Vortec car is making 370 ft/lb and 180hp At 3500 rpm the Magi car is making 660 ft/lb and 440hp THe Vortec car is making 470ft/lb and 320hp At 4500 the Magi car is making 660 ft/lb and 565 HP The Vortec car is making 565 ft/lb and 480hp At 5500 the magi car is making 630 ft/lb and 660hp The Vortec car is making 595ft/lb and 620hp At 6500 the Magi car is making 560ft/lb and 695hp The Vortec car is making 540ft/lb and 670hp Also the Magi car brakes 550 ft/lb at 2200 rpm, and the Vortec car take to twice that at 4400 rpm to brake 550ft/lb As you can see, the peek HP #'s are close, but below the peek the Magi car makes WAY more power every were. The lower you get in the RPM range and more advantage the Magi car has. Like I said there is more then one way to skin a cat. And if you were looking to make 800+whp on a built motor you would have a hard time doing it with the TVS, but there are Vortec's that will get you there and well beyond. Last edited by FastMatt; 04-26-2010 at 05:09 PM. |
04-26-2010, 05:40 PM | #38 | |
Petro-sexual
|
Quote:
What is a little confusing to me is, is that I'm not seeing many posts, anywhere, that seem to really be pushing the Maggies. I see many around 10s to low teens, not that many that are pushing more. |
|
04-26-2010, 06:07 PM | #39 | |
Drives: 1969 & 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,849
|
Quote:
Vipers have a safe rwhp limit of ~700 rwhp before the pistons crumble. Mine is at 675 rwhp, so it is close enough to that safe level. Yes, it does make some boost at lower RPM, but nothing to be proud of. The Paxton does look nice under my hood, and it does do well in the 1/4-mile (car traps 135 mph), but it is truly a boring setup to drive around 99% of the time. Feels stock until after 5,000 rpm or 100 mph, whichever comes first.
__________________
Fquick.com/NineBall
|
|
04-26-2010, 06:33 PM | #40 |
Drives: Vortech 'Charged 06 Mustang GT Join Date: May 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 155
|
Sounds like the supercharger is doing its job then.
It sounds more like the "safe rwhp limit" of the engine is what you are bored with, which is certainly not a shortcoming of the supercharger in any way, shape, or form. Becoming used to the power output of your car is an unfortunate and inevitable side-effect of any setup given enough time. There are Vipers with built engines running the same Paxton NOVI 2000 making comfortably over 1,000 hp, so the supercharger is ready to make more power when you are. With 700rwhp feeling slow to you, you truly have my respect. Most people have no concept of even what that much power is like, and you are bored with it. My hat is off to you. |
04-26-2010, 06:47 PM | #41 |
Drives: 2005 pontiac gto Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: akron oh
Posts: 174
|
because the screw type blowers are more fun to drive due to the low end torque and the seat of the pants power delivery. I have riden/driven both and even though the centrifical may be qually as fast the screw just seems more fun. Also the tvs blower rivals some twin screws. Take a look at this. a gt500 with a tvs 2300 @ 18psi making 738 to the tire and 715rwtrq.
http://www.svtperformance.com/forums...mm-tb-lts.html |
04-26-2010, 07:03 PM | #42 | |
Drives: 1969 and 2010 Camaros Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 514
|
Quote:
William
__________________
Planetlsx.com online magazine rep
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What song are you listening to right now | Muscle Master | Off-topic Discussions | 6743 | 04-25-2024 10:35 PM |
L99 Love | Mod4SS | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 95 | 02-14-2015 07:51 PM |
First car. First love. First heartbreak. | elcamino85 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 16 | 12-10-2009 03:35 PM |
Ragbrai riders LOVE the Camaro | Brokinarrow | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 3 | 07-23-2009 03:26 PM |
Love my car! 13899 | Rogue Leader | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 12 | 06-20-2009 04:32 PM |