Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Vararam
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-10-2011, 12:13 PM   #1
TOMS1SS


 
Drives: NA
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NA
Posts: 12,126
Recommended Fuel Myths (All Engines)

Alright, all this BS I've been seeing with a lot of myths on this forum about what fuels to use. The one that gets me is saying 93 Octane is required for the LS3 and L99. I've seen lots of people ask the same questions about Octane over and over again when the answers are contained in the last place people think to look; the manual. Don't worry LTT people the manual has you covered also. Here it is word for word from the manual itself section 8-44 Recommended Fuel:

If the vehicle has the 3.6L V6 engine (VIN Code V), use regular unleaded gasoline with a posted octane rating of 87 or higher. If the octane rating is less than 87, an audible knocking noise, commonly referred to as spark knock, might be heard when driving. If this occurs, use a gasoline rated at 87 octane or higher as soon as possible. If heavy knocking is heard when using gasoline rated at 87 octane or higher, the engine needs service.

If the vehilce has the 6.2L V8 engine (VIN Code W) or the 6.2L V8 engine (VIN Code J), use premium unleaded gasoline with a posted octane rating of 91 or higher. For best performance, use premium unleaded gasoline with a posted octane rating of 93. You can also use us regular unleaded gasoline rated at 87 octane or higher, but the vehicle's acceleration could be slightly reduced, and a slight audible knocking noise, commonly referred to as spark knock, might be heard. If the octane rating is less than 87 a heavy knocking noise might be heard when driving. If this occurs, use a gasoline rated at 87 octane or higher as soon as possible. Otherwise, you could damage the engine. If heavy knocking is heard when using a gasoline rated at 87 octane or higher, the engine needs service.

- First lets clear something up about 93 octane. While yes you'll get slightly better performance in your L99/LS3 it is likely a minimal benefit and probably a waste of money unless your going to racing or something to that effect. The spec for the L99/LS3 is clear as day 91 octane. It drives me nuts when I see people on this forum say otherwise especially when the difference per gallon between 91 and 93 octane can be .30 cents plus on the gallon.

As for the part about 87 octane being used in the LS3/L99 the engine computer retards the spark to compensate for the lower grade fuel. Commonly people here on Camaro5 complain that their car has reduced performance when the accidentally put 87 octane in and go back to 91 on the next tank. This is because the computer has not reset for the 91 octane and remedy I've seen for resetting the computer would be pulling fuses or unplugging the battery.

For the LTT guys sometimes I see stuff about using 89 or 91 octane in your cars. While it doesn't say anything about using a higher octane, why would you dump a more expensive fuel into your car when you'll get factory performance at 87?
TOMS1SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 12:17 PM   #2
CamaroKid300
ace5.org
 
CamaroKid300's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 ZL1 M6
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 6,142
This is nice to have this all in one post. Thanks.

However, I sense some flaming in your future.
__________________
Stock...For Now.
CamaroKid300 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 12:21 PM   #3
TOMS1SS


 
Drives: NA
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NA
Posts: 12,126
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroKid300 View Post
This is nice to have this all in one post. Thanks.

However, I sense some flaming in your future.

So do I. Personally all I really take issue with people saying that 93 octane is a requirement for the LS3/L99 when people ask (who honestly don't know) what fuel to use. If some wants to use 93 octane because they want to, I don't have a problem with that by any means its just not the required fuel.
TOMS1SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 12:23 PM   #4
armysig
Catch me if you can
 
armysig's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 IOM ZL-1
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,461
Oyi....You might want to do some research on why Arizona has 91 octane fuel. I know the answer, but I want you to look it up. You'll get more out learning about it and why we have it here vs the east coast, south and some northern states.
__________________
armysig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 12:24 PM   #5
irocnroll


 
irocnroll's Avatar
 
Drives: '91 RS Vert, '11 Grand Cherokee
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by TOMS1SS View Post
So do I. Personally all I really take issue with people saying that 93 octane is a requirement for the LS3/L99 when people ask (who honestly don't know) what fuel to use. If some wants to use 93 octane because they want to, I don't have a problem with that by any means its just not the required fuel.
I totally agree with your post, but as said above this will turn into flame war.
irocnroll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 12:24 PM   #6
CamaroFemme

 
CamaroFemme's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 1,879
It's in the manual that at least 91 needs to be put in the V8 or it WILL go into the lower performance table, and you have to do a fuse pull to get it to reset. I can verify all this from personal experience from when someone accidentally put 87 in my tank.

Edit: I've actually never seen someone say 93 was a requirement.
__________________
--
My boyfriend don't mind it.
CamaroFemme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 12:25 PM   #7
BenningJ

 
BenningJ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 AGM 1SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Cedar Falls, Iowa
Posts: 1,581
I use the 89 octane in my LLT because it is actually 10 cents cheaper here in Iowa. Of course, it has 10% ethanol blend. I have used since day one without any issues.
__________________
2013 Camaro 1SS/RS - Ashen Gray Metallic
| LS3 | CAI Inductions, Inc Intake | Vmax Ported Throttle Body | Dynatech 1.875" Long Tube Headers | Apex Scoop & Washer Bottle Relocation | Lethal Racing Night Fury Cam | BTR 7.400" Push Rods |LS2 Dampener | Melling 10296 Oil Pump | IWIS Chain | BTR .660" Dual Valve Springs | BTR Trunion Upgrade Kit | Lethal Racing Tuned | Anvil Notch Spoiler | BMR Split Drop Springs | Eaton TrueTrac | GM 3.91 Gears | LPW Diff Cover | Rohana RF2 275/40 20x10F 315/35 20x11R | BMR Polyurethane Motor Mounts
BenningJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 12:27 PM   #8
CamaroKid300
ace5.org
 
CamaroKid300's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 ZL1 M6
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 6,142
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenningJ View Post
I use the 89 octane in my LLT because it is actually 10 cents cheaper here in Iowa. Of course, it has 10% ethanol blend. I have used since day one without any issues.
89 is cheaper than 87?

Wut?
__________________
Stock...For Now.
CamaroKid300 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 12:28 PM   #9
TOMS1SS


 
Drives: NA
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NA
Posts: 12,126
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroFemme View Post
It's in the manual that at least 91 needs to be put in the V8 or it WILL go into the lower performance table, and you have to do a fuse pull to get it to reset. I can verify all this from personal experience from when someone accidentally put 87 in my tank.
True that is what it say, the battery one came from Fbodfather so who am I to say that won't work also?
TOMS1SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 12:29 PM   #10
TOMS1SS


 
Drives: NA
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NA
Posts: 12,126
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroKid300 View Post
89 is cheaper than 87?

Wut?
The more ethanol in the blend the more money at the pump.
TOMS1SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 12:30 PM   #11
SlingShot


 
SlingShot's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 ZL1 - #670
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Seminole, Fl.
Posts: 8,009
In the past two years, I don't recall very many people saying 93 was required. Also it has been proven by the V6 guys, there is a slight performance gain using premium fuel although it may not be cost effective.
__________________
SlingShot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 12:31 PM   #12
UT-Engineer
Just Cruisin'
 
UT-Engineer's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Synergy Camaro
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,224
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlingShot View Post
In the past two years, I don't recall very many people saying 93 was required. Also it has been proven by the V6 guys, there is a slight performance gain using premium fuel although it may not be cost effective.
i stick with 87 for my V6 but there is a difference when using 91/93... i just dont think its worth the cost.
__________________
2010 Synergy Green Camaro
25% Tint - CGM Painted GM GFX - 20" Niche M102 Wheels

UT-Engineer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 12:32 PM   #13
BATMANs
 
Drives: GTO & NSX
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 197
I run 91 octance california gas from COSTCO in both my blown cars (see below). No issues or blown engines.
__________________
2005 GTO Maggie, Forged engine, CAI, Kooks LTH, Magnaflow, Billet Pro shifter, LS7 clutch, 245/275 18" on Petrol Octane, Addco Sways, Koni Yellows, King Springs, Whiteline bushings, EBC Red, X-drilled/slotted rotors, SS brake lines, 55w HID, PLX gauges

1993 NSX Kenne Bell 2.1, Laminova IC, sway bars, NSX-R chassis bars, and non-compliance toe links, Tien EDFC, STMPO exhaust & brake ducts, RM Racing headers, K&N/Cantrall intake, Enkei RP03 17"18", APR GTC-300
BATMANs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 12:32 PM   #14
Supercharged SS
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sandy Hook, CT
Posts: 11,927
Who buys an SS and then wants less performance out of it? If I wanted less than what I bought I would have bought the V6.
Supercharged SS is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fuel: getting it right the first time S-eatin-grin Forced Induction - V8 45 08-30-2012 01:22 PM
MPG for the Z28 OPP Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics 71 12-08-2010 03:00 PM
Lethal Performance/ Fore Precision Fuel Hats- CHECK THIS THING OUT Jared@Lethal Forced Induction 3 08-12-2010 11:30 AM
Generation V V8 Engines Update!!! Mr. Wyndham General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 29 07-08-2010 03:05 PM
Camaro ls3 news...true or false? Dark Knight Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 74 06-05-2008 05:29 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.