OZMO Carbon Fiber Intake Manifold

[pyr0b0y]

Originally Posted by pouncer72

I'm still trying to figure out the purpose of a filter after one of the rails. Blows my mind.

The regulator was recommended by Aeromotive; hope it wasn't just them selling more than was necessary.....

towards the bottom:
http://aeromotiveinc.com/camaro-stealth/

I might just give them a call tomorrow for the hell of it!

[CamaroSpike23]

Originally Posted by pyr0b0y

So I've been looking at it ALL DAY! I can't figure out how to route it a different way! Any ideas? I need to do it Friday at the latest....

You would have to shorten the crossover line that goes under the TB. Tho as asked above, why do you have an inline fuel filter between the rails?

Originally Posted by pyr0b0y

The regulator was recommended by Aeromotive; hope it wasn't just them selling more than was necessary.....

towards the bottom:
http://aeromotiveinc.com/camaro-stealth/

I might just give them a call tomorrow for the hell of it!

you need the regulator, but he was asking about the inline fuel filter between the rails. in the picture that I circled the lengths of fuel lines, you can see what we are talking about.

[kencam]

Just re-reread your post.

What is that popoff valve for?

Since you have FI, you might want to try running without the velocity stacks inside the plenums (or have the stacks ourside the plenums instead). The current config is more benefical for an all motor engine.

Originally Posted by pyr0b0y

nothing like that on this manifold. There is a popoff valve on only the passenger side plenum though.....hmmmmm. I think I'll shoot the designer an email and find out! great question!

[pyr0b0y]

Originally Posted by CamaroSpike23

You would have to shorten the crossover line that goes under the TB. Tho as asked above, why do you have an inline fuel filter between the rails?




you need the regulator, but he was asking about the inline fuel filter between the rails. in the picture that I circled the lengths of fuel lines, you can see what we are talking about.

I (dont think) that's a filter. To my knowledge its just a tee adapter.

[pyr0b0y]

Originally Posted by kencam

Just re-reread your post.

What is that popoff valve for?

Since you have FI, you might want to try running without the velocity stacks inside the plenums (or have the stacks ourside the plenums instead). The current config is more benefical for an all motor engine.

Popoff valve is incase too much presssure builds up in the manifold, instead of the manifold blowing up, it releases the pressure through the valve.

It's got extremely short runners, which is for FI. They make an all motor intake too: (this one is run with 2 TBs, so it doesn't work with the factory computer)

[kencam]

Oh mamma!!!

Originally Posted by pyr0b0y

They make an all motor intake too: (this one is run with 2 TBs, so it doesn't work with the factory computer)

[pyr0b0y]

Originally Posted by kencam

Oh mamma!!!

Now those are tall runners lol. It's been fitted on a vette LS3, but no one has ever installed one on a camaro; you would need to buy like a Motec of similar to run it...kinda sucks but its beautiful in person!

[kencam]

Originally Posted by pyr0b0y

Popoff valve is incase too much presssure builds up in the manifold, instead of the manifold blowing up, it releases the pressure through the valve.

Ah, I see. Good idea!

Originally Posted by pyr0b0y

It's got extremely short runners, which is for FI. They make an all motor intake too: (this one is run with 2 TBs, so it doesn't work with the factory computer)

I always thought when you have FI it was better if you didn't have velocity stacks in the airstream because you don't need them to generate flow velocity anymore and by not putting them in the airstream it cuts down on internal turbulence.

[CamaroSpike23]

Originally Posted by pyr0b0y

I (dont think) that's a filter. To my knowledge its just a tee adapter.

I just looked a little closer and saw the other line coming off down below it...





ok... give me a minute to draw something up. can't guarantee you will be able to do it by tomorrow, but we'll see.

[CamaroSpike23]

what is that T fitting going back to?

[SRT10KLLR]

Originally Posted by pyr0b0y

I sorta wanna keep the tee adapter for feeding the fuel lines, but am considering doing this at the rear of the fuel rails, then adding one more adapter right before the regulator. I was told that I could starve one side by doing what you are suggesting; have you heard this? I think it's more of a safety issue?

Look carefully at the pic I posted. All I did was move the T adapter to the rail. I did not fully erase the existing T but that is what I would do.

So the T that is by the factory hard line would just be moved to the passenger side rail with the crossover line hooked to it then it would go over to the drivers side. Same as how you have it but with the T attached to the rail instead it looks a little better.

I just have the crossover from one rail to the other but your setup is different.

[pyr0b0y]

No luck with getting a decent dyno with the intake on. Gotta take care of my fuel system before we get some actual numbers.

A photoset of my carbon fiber twin plenum intake manifold; true car porn!

[ayousef]

that intake is sick, but I thought youd use something like a 102mm throttle to go with it.

Otherwise, with regards to using dual throttle bodies and the factory ECU, im working on it, lets see if I get somewhere.

[pyr0b0y]

Originally Posted by ayousef

that intake is sick, but I thought youd use something like a 102mm throttle to go with it.

Otherwise, with regards to using dual throttle bodies and the factory ECU, im working on it, lets see if I get somewhere.

Nope, just a stock size ported throttle body. OZMO now makes a controller for the dual TB intakes.



Software