03-17-2014, 06:11 PM | #15 |
Drives: 2013 SS Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,102
|
And what does it run in the 1/4?
__________________
|
03-17-2014, 06:17 PM | #16 |
old school chevy rodder
Drives: 2013 2SS/RS Manual,DM exhaust,CRT Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,588
|
here TSP's best cam, not exactly the most tame, have to rev some to not surge in the low gears. 491 h.p. , 448 torque Stock ls3 with CAI induction and Stainless power headers with cats through dual mode exhaust...2013 Camaro with electric power steering. No under drive pulley, no ported heads or intakes, or throttle body just the basic three with a good tune, and pulls like a raging ape on steroids straight to the moon. it is the .639/ .623 cam with .675 springs 235/239 duration 112 lSA. Budget build and its just fine with me.
DID IT BEAT THE " NIGHT FURY" SIMILARLY EQUIPPED? That's for you to figure out. Mines on a SAE Mustang dyno too. I am sure the dual mode helped and electric power steering?
__________________
2021 Wild Cherry ZL1 A10, Sunroof, Data, Carbon, Nav, RotoFab Dry CAI, Elite x2, Borla ATK, Driveshaft shop
|
03-17-2014, 06:22 PM | #17 |
Drives: 2013 SS Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,102
|
So everyone is judging a cam by the DYNO numbers vs track numbers????
__________________
|
03-17-2014, 06:24 PM | #18 |
Drives: 2011 ss Join Date: May 2013
Location: va
Posts: 983
|
|
03-17-2014, 06:29 PM | #19 | |
Drives: 2010 aqua blue SS/RS M6 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: plainfield, IL
Posts: 2,706
|
Quote:
__________________
10.91 at 122 H/C stock block N/A
|
|
03-17-2014, 06:31 PM | #20 |
Drives: 2010 aqua blue SS/RS M6 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: plainfield, IL
Posts: 2,706
|
That's why there are so many slow 1/4 miles camaro's
__________________
10.91 at 122 H/C stock block N/A
|
03-17-2014, 07:29 PM | #21 |
Drives: 2013 SS Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,102
|
Yup, seems people go for the most talked about big dyno numbered cams and not the ones getting the quickest times.
__________________
|
03-17-2014, 08:09 PM | #22 |
Banned
Drives: ... Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: ...
Posts: 398
|
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=346360
Note the trap speeds. The reason why this cam isn't judged by track numbers is because not everyone tracks their car. It's getting old seeing that comment in every thread. Also, most nf cars are m6, which require much more skill and seat time to get down the track properly. |
03-17-2014, 08:11 PM | #23 | |
Drives: 2011 2SS RS L99 Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 5,708
|
Quote:
|
|
03-17-2014, 08:23 PM | #24 | |
Drives: 2013 SS Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,102
|
Quote:
your point is? NF ain't the BEST out there thats for sure there is no "BEST" Edit: I'm a drag racer so I look at numbers at the track I careless what a dyno sheet says. Not turning this into a pissing match,
__________________
|
|
03-17-2014, 08:39 PM | #25 |
|
Our SS3 makes 490's 450's on stock heads.
SS2 is about 10 hp and tq less, with better power up to about 4k. |
03-17-2014, 08:44 PM | #26 |
|
To the OP, I always ask a customer what is YOUR goal with the car.
|
03-17-2014, 08:45 PM | #27 |
Drives: 2010 aqua blue SS/RS M6 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: plainfield, IL
Posts: 2,706
|
Getting sick of hearing the truth I guess. Not everyone races, but I would still pick parts based on what I see performing the best at the tracks. Prime example, my buddy picked a cam for his GTO based on it making huge dyno numbers. On the track he is struggling to run 11s... I think will go 11s but like I told him when he picked it, it was not right for his gearing and stall, to much cam no matter what it made on the dyno! Smaller cam and he would be faster with less.
__________________
10.91 at 122 H/C stock block N/A
|
03-17-2014, 08:51 PM | #28 | |
Drives: 2013 SS Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,102
|
Quote:
I still stand by my 1st post
__________________
|
|
|
|
Tags |
cam, dyno, shaft, spec, suggestion |
|
|