Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Roto-Fab
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Tuning / Diagnostics -- engine and transmission


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-18-2015, 01:58 PM   #1
camguynj


 
camguynj's Avatar
 
Drives: '13 SS/RS LS3 BRM Cammed NPP
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,812
Commanded Lambda

Is a Commanded Lambda > 1.0 commanding more fuel or more air?
camguynj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2015, 02:30 PM   #2
MagnumForceGB


 
MagnumForceGB's Avatar
 
Drives: Fastest 2010 Camaro V6
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, OK
Posts: 3,571
< 1.0 is more fuel than air, > 1.0 is less fuel than air
__________________
Camaro V6 = 11.268 @ 120.11
MagnumForceGB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2015, 02:36 PM   #3
camguynj


 
camguynj's Avatar
 
Drives: '13 SS/RS LS3 BRM Cammed NPP
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,812
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagnumForceGB View Post
< 1.0 is more fuel than air, > 1.0 is less fuel than air
Does that imply a Commanded Lambda of 1.10 is commanding less fuel because the engine is running rich?
camguynj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2015, 03:18 PM   #4
MagnumForceGB


 
MagnumForceGB's Avatar
 
Drives: Fastest 2010 Camaro V6
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, OK
Posts: 3,571
Yes, but unless it is in deceleration or power enrichment mode it should be 1.0.
__________________
Camaro V6 = 11.268 @ 120.11
MagnumForceGB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2015, 06:03 AM   #5
Rhino79


 
Rhino79's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS L99/Auto
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cabot, AR
Posts: 2,827
In lambda, less than 1 is richer than stoich, and higher is leaner. In EQ ratio, higher than 1 is richer than stoich, and less than, is leaner.
Rhino79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2015, 06:23 AM   #6
camguynj


 
camguynj's Avatar
 
Drives: '13 SS/RS LS3 BRM Cammed NPP
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,812
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagnumForceGB View Post
Yes, but unless it is in deceleration or power enrichment mode it should be 1.0.
Found out that Commanded Lambda is calculated by the ECM using fuel map info & various sensors to determine Short Term Fuel Trim.

So a Commanded Lambda >1will result in a -STFT (negative take fuel away) and Commanded Lambda < 1 will result in a (positive add fuel) STFT

Last edited by camguynj; 03-23-2015 at 08:43 AM.
camguynj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2015, 10:27 AM   #7
thahemp
Geek
 
thahemp's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Black LS3
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Derby, KS
Posts: 4,343
Trims don't have anything to do with commanded lambda. Trims are determined completely by the front O2 sensors in closed loop. If commanded lambda is anything other than 1.0, then narrowband fuel trims are useless.
__________________
01000111011011110110111101100100001000000110110001 11010101100011011010110010000001110111011010010111 01000110100000100000011101000110100001101001011100 110010000001101111011011100110010100100001

x = ac97968bd3df8f968c8cd3df998a9c94d3df9c8a918bd3df9c 909c94df8c8a9c949a8dd3df92908b979a8ddf998a9c949a8d d3df8b968b8cd1
x = ~x
thahemp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2015, 06:04 PM   #8
camguynj


 
camguynj's Avatar
 
Drives: '13 SS/RS LS3 BRM Cammed NPP
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,812
Quote:
Originally Posted by thahemp View Post
Trims don't have anything to do with commanded lambda. Trims are determined completely by the front O2 sensors in closed loop. If commanded lambda is anything other than 1.0, then narrowband fuel trims are useless.
Read the below link ...real good info.
http://info.efidynotuning.com/fuel101.htm

Note these highlights...

Lambse is a derivative of LAMBDA or the "AFR" (air/fuel ratio) the ecu is
demanding" .

STFT = Lambse
Short Term Fuel Trim is the lambse difference from stoich (1.000 - lambse) * 100 ,
It is the exact same representation of Lambse.
To put this into perspective, lets say at WOT we have a LAMBSE of 0.800
1.000 - 0.800 = 0.2 * 100 = 20 (STFT)
Now, lets say we have a negative STFT value of -18
1.000 - (-18 / 100) = 1.18 LAMBSE

as you can infer, a negative STFT means its removing fuel, so lambse will be greater than 1.000 (leaner)
a positive STFT means it is adding fuel, so lambse is less than 1.000 (richer)"
camguynj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2015, 08:37 AM   #9
thahemp
Geek
 
thahemp's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Black LS3
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Derby, KS
Posts: 4,343
Ok. I'm not sure what you're trying to get at here. STFT is still only useful if commanded lambda is 1.0.
__________________
01000111011011110110111101100100001000000110110001 11010101100011011010110010000001110111011010010111 01000110100000100000011101000110100001101001011100 110010000001101111011011100110010100100001

x = ac97968bd3df8f968c8cd3df998a9c94d3df9c8a918bd3df9c 909c94df8c8a9c949a8dd3df92908b979a8ddf998a9c949a8d d3df8b968b8cd1
x = ~x
thahemp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2015, 11:26 AM   #10
camguynj


 
camguynj's Avatar
 
Drives: '13 SS/RS LS3 BRM Cammed NPP
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,812
Quote:
Originally Posted by thahemp View Post
Ok. I'm not sure what you're trying to get at here. STFT is still only useful if commanded lambda is 1.0.
I'm saying that Commanded Lambda is the same as Lambse (which is dynamically calculated by the ECU and can be 1.0, <1.0 , or >1.0) to determine the STFT.

So when Commanded Lambda/Lambse is:
1.0 (STFT=0) no fuel change
<1.0 (STFT is +) add fuel
>1 .0 (STFT is -) remove fuel
camguynj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2015, 04:22 PM   #11
thahemp
Geek
 
thahemp's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Black LS3
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Derby, KS
Posts: 4,343
No that is not how it works.

Commanded lambda is not used to determine fuel trims. If STFTs are active, then commanded lambda is 1.0. Period.

Maybe you're confusing commanded lambda with actual lambda? They are two different things. STFT of +10% would imply that your actual lambda was 1.10 while your commanded lambda is 1.0. All the STFT is doing though is bringing actual lambda back to 1.0.
__________________
01000111011011110110111101100100001000000110110001 11010101100011011010110010000001110111011010010111 01000110100000100000011101000110100001101001011100 110010000001101111011011100110010100100001

x = ac97968bd3df8f968c8cd3df998a9c94d3df9c8a918bd3df9c 909c94df8c8a9c949a8dd3df92908b979a8ddf998a9c949a8d d3df8b968b8cd1
x = ~x
thahemp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2015, 04:30 PM   #12
camguynj


 
camguynj's Avatar
 
Drives: '13 SS/RS LS3 BRM Cammed NPP
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,812
Quote:
Originally Posted by thahemp View Post
No that is not how it works.

Commanded lambda is not used to determine fuel trims. If STFTs are active, then commanded lambda is 1.0. Period.

Maybe you're confusing commanded lambda with actual lambda? They are two different things. STFT of +10% would imply that your actual lambda was 1.10 while your commanded lambda is 1.0. All the STFT is doing though is bringing actual lambda back to 1.0.
I have a Dashlogic unit plugged into my OBD2 port. When it shows Commanded Lambda <1.0 it shows +STFT , when Commanded Lambda is >1.0 is shows -STFT
camguynj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2015, 08:37 AM   #13
thahemp
Geek
 
thahemp's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Black LS3
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Derby, KS
Posts: 4,343
Ok I had to go back and look at some logs to see when mine showed STFT values. Sometimes they don't make sense.. as in the values are there, but are not affecting fueling according to my wideband.

The ECM will command a richer lambda on startup and actual closed loop is on a 10 second delay when startup coolant temp is between 40* and 241*. Once that 10 seconds passes commanded lambda ramps up to 1.000 and fueling swings with the O2 sensor voltages as expected. Driving around I never see an EQ ratio other than 1.0 unless I go into power enrichment.

When do you see commanded lambda at values other than 1.0?
__________________
01000111011011110110111101100100001000000110110001 11010101100011011010110010000001110111011010010111 01000110100000100000011101000110100001101001011100 110010000001101111011011100110010100100001

x = ac97968bd3df8f968c8cd3df998a9c94d3df9c8a918bd3df9c 909c94df8c8a9c949a8dd3df92908b979a8ddf998a9c949a8d d3df8b968b8cd1
x = ~x
thahemp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2015, 09:40 AM   #14
camguynj


 
camguynj's Avatar
 
Drives: '13 SS/RS LS3 BRM Cammed NPP
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,812
Quote:
Originally Posted by thahemp View Post
Ok I had to go back and look at some logs to see when mine showed STFT values. Sometimes they don't make sense.. as in the values are there, but are not affecting fueling according to my wideband.

The ECM will command a richer lambda on startup and actual closed loop is on a 10 second delay when startup coolant temp is between 40* and 241*. Once that 10 seconds passes commanded lambda ramps up to 1.000 and fueling swings with the O2 sensor voltages as expected. Driving around I never see an EQ ratio other than 1.0 unless I go into power enrichment.

When do you see commanded lambda at values other than 1.0?
Always see Commanded lambda <1.0 at cold start up (.96 -.99) along with ST & LT fuel trims, very infrequently see Commanded lambda 1.1 while driving ...as these are displayed on the DIC its easy to view at startup, not so much while driving. Normally while driving I have the display set to oil temp, engine temp & gear ... mines a manual so it comes in handy at times. All good info in this tread. Thanks for your interest and posts.
camguynj is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.