You are browsing camaro5 
 |
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Where should the gas cap go? | |||
| On the top- Just like the concept's. |
   
|
36 | 59.02% |
| On the side-- The driver's side. |
  
|
6 | 9.84% |
| On the side-- The passenger's side. |
  
|
2 | 3.28% |
| I could care less... |
  
|
17 | 27.87% |
| Voters: 61. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
02-11-2008, 06:04 PM
|
#1 |
|
I drank what?
Drives: DANGEROUSLY Join Date: May 2007
Location: check your back seat...
Posts: 416
|
Gas cap location Poll...
I'm curious as to what the majority of people want GM to do with that gas cap.
 Some want it on top, some think the side is better, some don't care. What do you think? Cast your vote.
|
|
|
|
02-11-2008, 06:08 PM
|
#2 |
    
Drives: '12 Camaro ZL1 #1255 Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: O' Canada
Posts: 1,279
|
what ever GM does its for the good of us all.
nuff said /thread lol
__________________
 |
|
|
|
|
02-11-2008, 06:18 PM
|
#3 |
|
~ANTI-FORD~
Drives: Cadillac CTS Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 608
 |
I would like it on the drivers side, on the top. Just as it is in the concept. Too bad its on the passenger side and on the side... As far as the prototype goes. Thats that last spot I would want it. Even if it was on the drivers side like most GM cars I would be happy.
__________________
My Z28
  sorry guys.. sold Camaro and got a Cadillac CTS, waiting for a few years to get a 2010 SS used ;] |
|
|
|
|
02-11-2008, 06:47 PM
|
#4 |
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
Sorry boys, I had to be the oddball here. If it is indeed a cost-cutting measure (which I suspect it may have something to do with it) - then I'm all for GM's decision; as I want as much money as possible going into the powertrain, suspension, and the interior materials. So I "could care less"
Having said that - the concept's filler door location was very nice. And looked awesome. Would I say no to that? Hell no! Also - I know this is being discussed elsewhere - but the passenger/driver side thing is sort of a silly argument. Because there probably was no decision in the matter - it's a global car, so if the rest of the world mandates passenger side, then we have to get it, too.  Hey, look at it this way - You'll be in the minority as far as gas-cap locations go, so...There'll probably be 'more' open pumps for you, then the other guys!  .
__________________
"Keep the faith." - Fbodfather
 |
|
|
|
|
02-11-2008, 06:52 PM
|
#5 |
 
Drives: 2015 Malibu 1LT; '87 Grand Prix LE Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chilton, Wisconsin
Posts: 480
|
For me personally i could care less...just happy the camaro has returned and better then ever
  GM! 
|
|
|
|
|
02-11-2008, 06:56 PM
|
#6 |
|
SoCal Race Team #13
|
Care less, its a car not a custom piece of art to sit in the garage.
__________________
A.K.A - Diarmadhi (old handle) - So much to do.. So little money
Owner : Fast-Stache Industries LLC |
|
|
|
|
02-11-2008, 07:00 PM
|
#7 |
 
Drives: 2013 SS Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Loves Park, IL
Posts: 92
|
I' d prefer that it was on the driver' s side, but it doesn' t matter that much.
|
|
|
|
|
02-11-2008, 07:28 PM
|
#8 |
|
Moderator
Drives: 2018 Harley-Davidson Street Bob Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,769
 |
As long as I can fill the tank, I don't care what side of the car I have to fill.
__________________
RDP Motorsport//GEN5DIY//Cultrag Performance//JPSS//Rodgets Chevrolet//
Operation Demon//Buy at Invoice//RACECARWEAR RESPECT ALL CARS. LOVE YOUR OWN. warn 145:159 ban |
|
|
|
|
02-11-2008, 08:08 PM
|
#9 |
|
~ANTI-FORD~
Drives: Cadillac CTS Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 608
|
Yeah don't get me wrong, if its not on the drivers side\top then its no big deal to me. Thats just what I would prefer. More concerned with issues involving the motor and price.
__________________
My Z28
sorry guys.. sold Camaro and got a Cadillac CTS, waiting for a few years to get a 2010 SS used ;] |
|
|
|
|
02-11-2008, 08:18 PM
|
#10 |
 
Drives: 1998 convertible Camaro RS Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 220
|
Of course we'd love it on the top like the concepts, but do you remember why it isn't there? Scott let us know it was for the crash test regulations. This will be an extremely high volume car, and as with any extremely high volume car, safety is first. I could care less about crash test ratings, personally, but the average consumer... blah, blah, blah...
 
|
|
|
|
|
02-11-2008, 11:48 PM
|
#11 |
 
Drives: 06 Mustang GT Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 48
|
i could care less....as long as its affordable and still retains functionality.
|
|
|
|
|
02-12-2008, 01:08 AM
|
#12 | |
|
www.Camaro5store.com
|
Quote:
I think you know what I chose!
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-12-2008, 02:15 AM
|
#13 |
|
MOD SQUAD
|
 I'm still  about the news...
__________________
 Who cares about the Blue Oval crowd and their little Ponys? We're getting our Camaro back-and it'll be Supercharged!-MDAII Team LS3 |
|
|
|
|
02-12-2008, 07:51 AM
|
#14 |
 Drives: Camaros & Mustangs Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Port St Lucie, FL.
Posts: 168
|
Scott has already said that the reason the cap was relocated was due to fire hazards, so we should probably let it go.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2 more 2009 Camaro spy pics - fuel door location shown! (+ front headlights closeup) | HooliganZ | Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery | 369 | 07-02-2008 09:09 PM |
| New photos of two prototype Camaros shipped into LAX Airport ! | cesmieu | Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery | 96 | 02-09-2008 10:06 PM |
| gas guzzler tax | Mike88 | Canada | 15 | 01-08-2008 12:54 AM |
| Gas is 3$ a gallon for good. | 28Dennis | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 35 | 10-02-2007 12:00 PM |
