07-07-2009, 07:17 AM | #1 |
CLUTCH: where is the slave cylinder?
on the SS-M6, is the slave cylinder INSIDE the bellhousing like the vette or is it outside the bellhousing like older Camaro's?
(I PRAY it is external since the brake and clutch SHARE one reservoir) Thanks!
__________________
Why oh Why?
Windshield=10" vertical mirror= 3 7/8" (that's almost 4") vertical that means that the mirror is 38.75% the size of the vertical windshield... it sure seems like the ratio could be better... just sayin.... our collective MIRROR patch: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24612 |
|
07-07-2009, 09:16 AM | #2 |
39 views but nobody knows... i dont feel so ignorant now...
anyone know?
__________________
Why oh Why?
Windshield=10" vertical mirror= 3 7/8" (that's almost 4") vertical that means that the mirror is 38.75% the size of the vertical windshield... it sure seems like the ratio could be better... just sayin.... our collective MIRROR patch: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24612 |
|
07-07-2009, 10:41 AM | #3 |
Drives: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500HD Join Date: May 2009
Location: MD
Posts: 21
|
Ok - no one else is answering so while I dont know, I'll speculate......
I had a Vette (C5) and had the opportunity to experience the joy of changing the clutch and slave - dropping the whole rear end, torque tube, trans, and back of engine. If I remember correctly, the Camaro uses exactly the same transmission as the Vette in which case I would say that it will probably be the same as the Vette. They would have to re-design the trans to move the slave cylinder, in which case, it wouldnt be the same trans as the vette - it would be a different design, model, part #, etc. So - IF they use the same trans in the Camaro and the Vette (I'm sure someone will correct me if they dont) and the slave is located internaly on the Vette, then it will also be internal on the Camaro. If its a different trans in the Camaro then there is a chance that they used a little more common sense designing it! ------ on a side note..........does the Camaro have a torque tube like the vette, or just a naked driveshaft? (just thought of this as I was typing this) |
07-07-2009, 11:43 AM | #4 |
Thanks.
i cant imagine that they are the "same"... doesnt the vette have a transaxle in the back? engine in front and only a transaxle in back? coulda swore i saw pix of it somewhere but i dont own a vette. the Camaro is DEFINATELY a FWD mounted transmission with an open driveshaft. (non articulating because of the solid mount differential) thanks again for the response. anybody else can set me straight?
__________________
Why oh Why?
Windshield=10" vertical mirror= 3 7/8" (that's almost 4") vertical that means that the mirror is 38.75% the size of the vertical windshield... it sure seems like the ratio could be better... just sayin.... our collective MIRROR patch: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24612 |
|
07-07-2009, 12:31 PM | #5 |
Drives: 68 big block Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: tossed off see ya
Posts: 400
|
|
07-07-2009, 12:53 PM | #6 |
That SUX unless GM figured out how to keep the clutch dust from getting into the system like it does on vettes. With the clutch and brake fluid combined in on resevoir it coups spell BAD results. My clutch has already hung open once which is a sign of contamination. Hmmmmmm.
__________________
Why oh Why?
Windshield=10" vertical mirror= 3 7/8" (that's almost 4") vertical that means that the mirror is 38.75% the size of the vertical windshield... it sure seems like the ratio could be better... just sayin.... our collective MIRROR patch: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24612 Last edited by LDGn63; 07-07-2009 at 01:19 PM. |
|
07-07-2009, 02:57 PM | #7 |
Drives: 2014 Z/28 #82+#192, 18ZLE 66Nova Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: By the lake in AZ
Posts: 15,719
|
Its In you car Manuel, And it said that "clutch and brake fluid combined in on reservoir" and yes it dos spell BAD results, One more thing to redo.
|
07-07-2009, 03:12 PM | #8 | |
Quote:
i did see in the manual that they are one reservoir... but i didnt see where it said that the slave was INSIDE the bellhousing. If they knew that contamination was a problem why in the world would they purposely allow the contamination to freely flow into the BRAKE system of all places? SURELY the contamination problem is fixed????
__________________
Why oh Why?
Windshield=10" vertical mirror= 3 7/8" (that's almost 4") vertical that means that the mirror is 38.75% the size of the vertical windshield... it sure seems like the ratio could be better... just sayin.... our collective MIRROR patch: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24612 |
||
07-07-2009, 08:19 PM | #9 | |
Drives: 2010 SS RS IOM M6 Join Date: May 2009
Location: Brampton Ontario
Posts: 246
|
Quote:
__________________
Delivered July 30 2009
|
|
07-07-2009, 08:35 PM | #10 | ||
Quote:
__________________
Why oh Why?
Windshield=10" vertical mirror= 3 7/8" (that's almost 4") vertical that means that the mirror is 38.75% the size of the vertical windshield... it sure seems like the ratio could be better... just sayin.... our collective MIRROR patch: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24612 |
|||
07-07-2009, 09:27 PM | #11 |
Drives: 2010 SS RS IOM M6 Join Date: May 2009
Location: Brampton Ontario
Posts: 246
|
Interesting presentation but there are a lot of holes in his theory.
I'm sure i read a GM TSB on clutch fluid discoloration being because of the use of carbon black in the seals and that it would not affect clutch operation. Haven't been able to find it yet but still looking.
__________________
Delivered July 30 2009
|
07-08-2009, 07:22 AM | #12 | |
Quote:
he does say that it was tested to be clutch dust... and if its on YouTube it MUST be fact... right?
__________________
Why oh Why?
Windshield=10" vertical mirror= 3 7/8" (that's almost 4") vertical that means that the mirror is 38.75% the size of the vertical windshield... it sure seems like the ratio could be better... just sayin.... our collective MIRROR patch: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24612 |
||
07-08-2009, 08:47 AM | #13 |
Drives: 1999 30th Anniversary Trans Am Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 681
|
|
07-08-2009, 11:46 AM | #14 | |
Drives: 2010 SS RS IOM M6 Join Date: May 2009
Location: Brampton Ontario
Posts: 246
|
Quote:
This issue definately is something i'm going to keep an eye on once i get my car tho.
__________________
Delivered July 30 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question for seasoned stick shift drivers | tommygun6644 | Dragstrip and Launch Techniques Discussion | 69 | 10-11-2010 10:42 PM |
L99 Delete Whats involved? | jsharp | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 59 | 05-26-2009 10:54 PM |
Burned my clutch a bit with Launch Control.... Caution you guys... | Embalmer | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 49 | 04-23-2009 08:49 PM |
L99 AFM -- It's REALLY a tough choice, for some. Step Inside. | 2KZ28_For_Now | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 128 | 04-03-2009 04:03 PM |
Camaro ls3 news...true or false? | Dark Knight | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 74 | 06-05-2008 05:29 PM |