You are browsing camaro5 
 |
|
05-17-2012, 05:47 AM
|
#1 |
 
|
60 ft times
On drag radials... Nto5r
Is 1.600 good? consistant 1.6.. |
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 06:57 AM
|
#2 |
Drives: 2010 CAMARO 850 RWHP/733 RWTQ Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lafayette,LA
Posts: 300
|
That's awesome !! Nothing to complain about for sure..That would be good even for slicks..
__________________
*Night Fury
*Vortec YSI *Alky Meth *RPM TH400 with Brake *Precision 3600 Converter *850 RWHP/733 RWTQ |
|
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 07:03 AM
|
#3 |
|
CamaroFans.com
|
I've seen one car on stock suspension turn 1.56 w/ MT DR's... My best was 1.77 and would love to get in the 1.6X range...
__________________
 |
|
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 07:40 AM
|
#4 |
|
1.6 is a pretty good 60' for such a heavy car IMHO. Supercharged?
__________________
#1 2012 NMCA/LSX Challenge Series
2012 2SS 45th A6 Thanks to our Sponsors: coldairinductions.com (Cold Air Inductions) loughengines.com (Mike Lough Race Engines) granatellimotorsports.com (Granatelli Motorsports) |
|
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 09:48 AM
|
#5 |
          
Drives: Race Car Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Seffner, FL
Posts: 6,226
|
It depends on what your power level and mods are. Really anyway you look at it 1.6 60ft time is very respectable.
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 12:30 PM
|
#6 |
|
|
I didnt see the post about 60 ft times till after I posted this question.
Supercharged. Nto5r 315/40/18 Lower control arms Toe link Sub frame bushings 9.5 lingenfelter diff 4.10 gear dss axles and driveshaft. |
|
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 11:11 PM
|
#7 |
|
Most hated in NM....
Drives: Sold the 6POINT2, went to a 50THZ06 Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 2,904
|
I am hoping to get to a 1.6... I would be real happy with that.
|
|
|
|
|
05-18-2012, 07:00 AM
|
#8 | |
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
|
Quote:
1.9 sec is good for a stock Camaro 1.7 sec is good for a bolt ons Camaro 1.5 sec is good for a supercharged Camaro But as mentioned, 1.6 is respectable at any power level. |
|
|
|
|
|
05-20-2012, 04:55 PM
|
#9 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Camaro Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sandy Hook, CT
Posts: 11,927
|
When I see 1.60 60's first thing I do is puke then call Ted and see what went wrong. 1.50 is bad nowadays.
 Anything not in the 1.4's I'll abort the pass. No sense in beating the car for a so-so pass.
|
|
|
|
|
05-20-2012, 04:57 PM
|
#10 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Camaro Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sandy Hook, CT
Posts: 11,927
|
Quote:
Joe, for a stick car that's pretty freaking good!  In the 1.5's and you're quite the driver.
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-20-2012, 05:49 PM
|
#11 | |
|
|
Quote:
8 runs at the track. Best 60 was 1.600, 1.602, 1.634 Twice! Back to back identical 60s! and a 1.658 Thats freaking Awesome for a car I got 3 days before! I think anyways. I expect a 1.4 soon. Thats my goal for now working on the sixty. Just gotta get that seat time and figure it out! |
|
|
|
|
|
05-20-2012, 07:16 PM
|
#12 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Camaro Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sandy Hook, CT
Posts: 11,927
|
Quote:
It's crazy how much that matters in the overall ET. I was sliding all over at Atco last week, shitty 60's 1.52-1.56 (no offense, this is bad for my car) and it killed the ET by at least .2. 1.60's 60's is getting it done in your car.  The best I've seen an M6 car 60' was Ted's 9.82 Vortech car with Teddy jr driving, He was mid 1.5's just totally beating the snot out of the car.
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-20-2012, 09:12 PM
|
#13 |
 
Drives: camaro SS Join Date: May 2012
Location: Grand Junction CO
Posts: 32
|
does elevation/ DA effect 60' at all? I have been able to do pretty consistant 1.7's but for here that seems to be really good. I have only seen a couple cars get 1.5's and a few others in the 1.6's.
Colorado elevation isn't the best..... |
|
|
|
|
05-20-2012, 09:22 PM
|
#14 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Camaro Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sandy Hook, CT
Posts: 11,927
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
