11-11-2009, 10:09 AM | #71 |
Account Suspended
Drives: SuperCharged 2SS/RS IOM MN6 Join Date: May 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 5,094
|
Temper, I don't pretent to be knowledgeable in computer stuff. I was just making an example and yet, you completely missed the point. Yes, I can understand you fix stuff but if you work for a company, you do it because you are getting paid to do what the company tells you to do. On the other hand, if you own the company and people are coming to you to fix 2nd or 3rd party mistakes and expect you to do it for free, I think you would be singing a different tune. I am willing to bet you don't get the point I just tried to make either.
Why the hatred for a car manufacturer's stance on possibly voiding your car warranty if/when you alter their product? Why did you buy a damn car to begin with??!!?? Put some wheels on your computer and ride it to work! |
11-11-2009, 10:16 AM | #72 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NorCal
Posts: 958
|
Someone needs to put a fork in this thread and put it out of its misery, the conversation has digressed from its original intent to a shouting match...lol
|
11-11-2009, 10:33 AM | #73 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: Cargo van. Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Metal Metal Land
Posts: 1,247
|
Quote:
So my car is supposed to run pig rich from the factory? You guys didnt want me to pick up a few hp and a mpg on purpose? A stock tune is no different...at all than any mail order aftermarket tune. Its a generic one size fits all tune. Some will lack in performance, some will lack in economy. But to say the factory tune is optimized is ridiculous otherwise my a/f ratio would of been dead on from the factory instead of leaning out to normal ranges with a CAI. If your tune was so optimized it should of not budged. That leads me to believe you guys tuned the motors without the Camaros intakes on them, maybe some sort of generic shop intake? Because it was off, no ifs ands or buts about it. Furthermore if the cars went through thousands of hours of tuning you would think they would of caught that the l99 cpus were getting stuck in low octane mode. Maybe in those thousands of hours of tuning (b.s.) they never thought to run different octanes to see what happens? LOL about as good of testing as the guys who made the PDIM. EDIT: Let me add though, I believe the transmission to be a different story. It can easily be broken through tuning and should not be messed with at all if you expect warranty work to ever be done on it. |
|
11-11-2009, 11:09 AM | #74 |
Account Suspended
Drives: SuperCharged 2SS/RS IOM MN6 Join Date: May 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 5,094
|
|
11-11-2009, 01:24 PM | #75 |
Drives: Chevy Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 6,534
|
|
11-11-2009, 03:56 PM | #76 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NorCal
Posts: 958
|
Not any one person that made it get that way, for me it seems that there are just too many viewpoints to continue in a positive way and it just became a who said what and who does or doesn't know what. What I take from this discussion is its a crap shoot on voiding the warranty if you make certain changes. Helped me decide to wait until the warranty is up before I do anything beyond the CAI better mufflers so it was good in a way just ran out of value..
|
11-11-2009, 10:42 PM | #77 | |
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 54
|
Lets take a different approach,
In computers, if you buy a laptop and then upgrade the ram is the warranty voided? No. They will obviously not cover the new ram unless bought from the same company. If it can be demonstrated you use incompatible ram then yes. You pay to fix. On a house, if you buy a new one with a warranty, and paint the walls, is the warranty voided? No. They will obviously not cover that paint. If you buy a iPod and use headphones that didn't come with it is the warranty voided? No. not unless you size it wrong and break the connector. If you buy a radio and use a different brand battery - still have the warranty. I did notice that some phones claim to void the warranty if you use a non-oem battery. I have never heard of this enforced. I still think if the battery is at the same spec then this is bullshit as well. It is a ploy to sell overpriced batteries. Printers do the same with INK. There are just so many examples of people personalizing the things that they buy. It is kinda what makes us all human. Like would the K&N Filter I bought void the warranty? It does change the filtering dynamics. That's different. It changes the way the engine will wear. K&N Claims it to be better, but that is speculative opinion. Did it void the warranty? You seem to think GM would be justified in saying that it does. And again, you COMPLETELY missed the whole segment on factory defects, their rates, the profitability of choosing a higher rate of defects. This seems highly suspect. You also seem completely oblivious to the concept of tolerances and specifications. Also, you ignored the argument about a stock vehicle "abused" like the elevator run at 99.99% of capacity too long. If fact, you only argument is that you messed with it you should take responsibility, and I agree to the point where you damaged the system. However, I was originally responding to this post: Quote:
Non-GM issued engine calibrations subject driveline components to stresses different than the calibrations which these components were validated to. Yes, different goes without saying. BUT DIFFERENT DOES NOT MEAN THAT IT EXCEEDED FACTORY SPECIFICATIONS. Something else that would be DIFFERENT would be to advertise a car at 400hp and then deliver 355hp! If fact, this whole tech bulletin seems like a way to screw the user. It also seems like it is up to the dealership, so if your buddy buddy your ok, if not then your screwed cause ANYTHING can be "suspect". Also, NO WHERE is there ANY mention of verifying that the ECM has not suffered some sort of corruption or failure. (And you can certainly be assured that the GM computer program in the ECM is PERFECT IN EVERY WAY AND IS COMPLETELY INFALLIBLE!) I originally chimed is because of my EMBEDDED PROGRAMMING EXPERIENCE AND THE PERIL OF THIS KIND OF ATTITUDE. But instead it seemed to get hostile because I have a non-conformity attitude. I have also been screwed more times than most. Finally, FOR THE RECORD, I bought this car because it was supposed to be a awesome looking bad ass performing car. While it does look good, its performance leaves something to be desired. The computer in this car is damn annoying. The power is never consistent. It is also still lacking in power. I take care of all my things, I still have a radio from my 14th year Christmas. (its 13 years old) It works perfectly and I still have the ORIGINAL remote control. I intend to take EXCELENT care of this car, and would not KNOWINGLY do ANYTHING to DAMAGE IT. Like, if you guys are serious that octane booster is bad, then I won't use it. I didn't see any disclaimer on the octane booster, and it was supposed to help with pinging/ping sensors. Also, before doing anything I do as much research as possible to make a well formed educated decision. I wouldn't even run the car in a MODERATELY RISKY CONFIGURATION. This has nothing to do with anything except it is MY CAR and I take CARE OF MY THINGS. I want this car to last for as long as possible. But I do expect it to perform, and I am not going to baby a 400hp sports car that cost me $40,000. If the car didn't have a warranty, I would be asking the same questions but looking for the answer of what would and would not break it. IE. How would tuning break the car, and what needs to be done so it won't. Should I just not tune it. But the general consensus seems to be that the tune is overly protected and designed for a lot of engines, all of which may not be the same. It, also, could EASILY be argued that a tune for your ACTUAL SPECIFIC ENGINE, would always be better and safer. I wish GM would just offer this service - i'd pay for it. If your still going to be pig headed and ignore a professional computer programmer WARNING you about this service bulletin and the perils of this "checksum" CVN's verification then I pity you. COMPUTERS ARE MORE CLOSELY IMPERFECT THAN PERFECT. They also have user error. So the hardware can fail and mess up, the programmer can make ALL SORTS OF MISTAKES (that are sometimes next to impossible to reproduce and detect), users can screw things up, and then you have tampering. So any real reason why your all over GM's jock so to speak? You act like your married to this car. |
|
11-12-2009, 07:09 PM | #78 | ||
Drives: CTS/CAMARO Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SEMA/PERF INDUSTRY GUY
Posts: 488
|
I'm not sure I want to touch this thread. It's pretty toxic. Temper you seem to want to argue just for the sake of it. I am going to point out a couple of things however.
In the extreme. Your car was certified by General Motors to meet the standards of the Federal Clean Air Act. Black and white, anything you do that alters the emissions output of the vehicle (like a non-certified tune) is a felony violation of federal law. The DOT/NHTSA would now consider your car an "off-road use only" vehicle. Again the black & white contract that this is a street car is no longer valid. GM has no responsibility for a "off-road use only" vehicle. It's not GM's rules you broke so much as it's the EPA's. The bulletin sited is not really relevant to this car. It uses a new GM Global Architecture (Global A) for the new GM Global Diagnostic System (GDS). It's a PC based system that's real time to the internet. The dealership doesn't have to submit a "snapshot" ,it's being looked at, and recoded, real-time by GM. Quote:
Quote:
BTW, Dealerships hate warranty work. It's a fixed rate. They make nothing, especially the tech.
__________________
"everyone wants to go to heaven. but nobody wants to die" "you gotta pay to play"
SEMA PICTURES-PARTS & CARS http://www.pbase.com/haveblue/sema_2009 |
||
11-12-2009, 09:24 PM | #79 | ||||
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 54
|
Quote:
Pronunciation: \ˈär-(ˌ)gyü\ Function: verb Inflected Form(s): ar·gued; ar·gu·ing Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French arguer to reprove, argue & Latin arguere to demonstrate, prove; Anglo-French arguer, from Latin argutare to prate, frequentative of arguere; akin to Hittite arkuwai- to plead, respond Date: 14th century intransitive verb 1 : to give reasons for or against something : reason <argue for a new policy> 2 : to contend or disagree in words : dispute <argue about money>transitive verb 1 : to give evidence of : indicate <the facts argue his innocence> 2 : to consider the pros and cons of : discuss <argue an issue> 3 : to prove or try to prove by giving reasons : maintain <asking for a chance to argue his case> 4 : to persuade by giving reasons : induce <couldn't argue her out of going> What is so wrong with "arguing"? I do prefer "Debate" Main Entry: 1de·bate Pronunciation: \di-ˈbāt, dē-\ Function: noun Date: 13th century : a contention by words or arguments: as a : the formal discussion of a motion before a deliberative body according to the rules of parliamentary procedure b : a regulated discussion of a proposition between two matched sides but, alas, we have no rules here :P Also, your god gave you a mouth to eat and talk. (or fingers for a keyboard in this case?) We made speech to learn from each other. How can we ever hope to discover truth without a debate? I argue for the sake of truth and learning. It is by far the most effective manner to do so as well. It also gives you perspectives you don't have and ideas you have never thought of. It is a all-around generally good idea. It is a shame the modern culture now somehow finds "arguing" a negative characteristic and tiresome or unpleasant. Quote:
That section of law really just governs the sale of the car. Seems to suggest that the factory settings must be re-installed before sale is attempted. Quote:
Not really, differing opinions never justify hostility. Everyone is entitled to an opinion. I think there is a legal argument for a lot of what I have said as well. Just claiming "tampering" does not remove liability. Take for example, you have a lawcare company that guarantees results, they fertilize, mow, and water your grass. You have a party on an off day, so you decided to mow yourself to make the yard look good for the party. Later performance doesn't meet the guaranteed levels. Your act of mowing does not necessarily remove the companies liability of performance. Now, if it states that you cannot mow, maybe, but still, you would have to demonstrate that mowing the yard out of cycle damages growth cycles. (ie. negatively impacts the growth enough to account for the reduced performance.) Also, if this doesn't cover the full amount of under-performance, then the yard care company could still be found partially liable. It is also, not like what I am saying is really that unreasonable, to say a car can't be modified really sucks. I also notice that the lingo in warranties are getting more and more wordy, probably more profit motive. Quote:
http://www.articlesbase.com/automoti...ts-113821.html http://www.reuters.com/article/press...09+PRN20090603 http://www.24-7-news.com/archives/1865 http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyb...k-engine-fire/ http://www.direct.ca/trinity/GM-Steering-Problem.htm http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wires/...ws_318945.html http://www.carcomplaints.com/Chevrol..._failure.shtml http://wot.motortrend.com/6569942/re...ans/index.html >>> http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/downloa...s/FLAT_RCL.zip NHTSA Recall Database If you import it into MS Access, and run the following query to tabulate totals: SELECT FLAT_RCL.[Make], COUNT(*) AS Total FROM FLAT_RCL GROUP BY FLAT_RCL.[Make]; You get: FLAT_RCL Query Make Total FORD 4891 CHEVROLET 3729 GMC 2513 DODGE 2443 INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER 2323 MACK 2192 FREIGHTLINER 1561 BLUE BIRD 1431 FLEETWOOD 1372 VOLVO 1318 THOMAS 1143 BMW 1106 HONDA 975 KENWORTH 935 INTERNATIONAL 879 PONTIAC 876 PREVOST 795 JEEP 729 PLYMOUTH 729 HARLEY DAVIDSON 711 VOLKSWAGEN 710 MERCURY 701 NISSAN 685 WINNEBAGO 684 CHRYSLER 677 TOYOTA 668 PETERBILT 667 SPARTAN 661 BUICK 656 MERCEDES BENZ 596 I would say GMC and Chevy having the #2 and #3 spot in recalls, some 6,242 total recalls for "defective parts", does not support your conclusion on defective parts being an urban myth. Again, this was the Office of Defects Investigation division of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). They mostly only investigate "Safety Concerns". Imagine how many pissed off people there are. Last edited by Temper; 11-12-2009 at 09:39 PM. Reason: Response flow. Table was removed by filter. |
||||
11-12-2009, 09:34 PM | #80 |
Go Blue!!!!!
Drives: 2012 Cruze LT Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 23,290
|
Good stuff!!!
|
11-12-2009, 10:09 PM | #81 | ||||||
Drives: CTS/CAMARO Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SEMA/PERF INDUSTRY GUY
Posts: 488
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Defective parts? Will always be. A mechanical machine with thousands of interacting parts, made by humans, will never be perfect. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"everyone wants to go to heaven. but nobody wants to die" "you gotta pay to play"
SEMA PICTURES-PARTS & CARS http://www.pbase.com/haveblue/sema_2009 |
||||||
11-12-2009, 10:22 PM | #82 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NorCal
Posts: 958
|
And here I thought this thread should have been put out of its misery long ago!? More of the same I'm afraid... kill it already Geesh: thumbdown:
|
|
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Your Warranty Rights | The_Blur | Camaro Issues / Problems | Warranty Discussions | TSB and Recalls | 75 | 10-19-2012 07:24 PM |
IMPORTANT Part 1 Warranty Disputes | Zeus | Camaro Issues / Problems | Warranty Discussions | TSB and Recalls | 11 | 08-25-2009 11:37 AM |
Anyone with a tune have warranty work yet? | caverman | Tuning / Diagnostics -- engine and transmission | 20 | 08-23-2009 10:23 AM |
Will the V6 have DBW or a good old fashioned cable throttle? | theholycow | Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 41 | 08-02-2009 08:25 PM |
LS3 goes 11`s Bonestock! | GMRULZ | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 28 | 12-08-2008 09:10 PM |