Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V6


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-19-2014, 11:31 PM   #29
motorhead


 
Drives: Love the one you're with
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Downtown Charlie Brown
Posts: 11,850
I would rather have a modern turbo 4 than any 305 V8 that Chevy ever produced. Although 305s do make good boat anchors.
motorhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2014, 08:01 PM   #30
Can't_C_Me
Don't Sleep on My V6
 
Can't_C_Me's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 C7 1LT
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Oxford, GA
Posts: 3,596
More fuel to the fire.

http://www.lsxtv.com/news/buy-four-c...th-gen-camaro/



Sent from my iPad Mini 2 Retina using Tapatalk HD
__________________
Can't_C_Me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2014, 05:45 AM   #31
stoopid

 
Drives: 4 wheels
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: anyplace, USA
Posts: 1,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by Can't_C_Me View Post
Seen this today haven't seen it around the forum so let's discuss. And is this confirmed? If so where have I been at...Start video at 3:30

http://youtu.be/yEE2dKuuSYo
I like the cut of his jib!

A nice turbo 4 would be fine by me (turbo 6 would have been sick though ), but to echo what others have said - it wouldn't work in a car similar in weight/design to the Gen5.

If they let the design stray too far, they'll lose customers. If they don't change it enough, they won't gain any customers. Not exactly win/win. I don't envy engineers!

I like NA cars, but wouldn't turn my nose up to a tried and tested turbo like the 2.0T running in the CTS and Malibu. Unfortunately it sounds like GM is already planning on getting every little bit from the 2.0T at stock, so a tune alone won't yield much. I don't think mods will get as much as some are suggesting above. That doesn't mean the engine won't work, just means the ceiling isn't as high as some would have you believe.
stoopid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2014, 09:22 AM   #32
DSX_Camaro

 
DSX_Camaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 SW 2LT/RS LFX/AY6
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,741
Well, for a few examples... Mercedes has a 2.0T that comes factory with 360hp and 332ftlbs, and on of the tuning companies for Mercedes has a canned tune that adds 50hp and 60ftlbs on top of the already impressive output. And every one of Ford's ecoboost engines has a tune package that adds a good bit of power (I forget horsepower, but usually 50-100ftlbs).

An I4T with a 3" downpipe split to dual 2.5" outlets, an intake and a good tune can hurdle 400hp and maintain its awesome gas mileage. (Also the 2.0T in the Cadillacs and Malibu has already been tuned for an average of 50hp and 50ftlbs stock by one company whom I again forget, and around 80whp by IPF) http://www.cadillacforums.com/forums...rades-ats.html
__________________
K&N CAI, 1LE Strut Tower Brace, Elite Engineering Catch Can and Clean Side Separator, Apex Scoop w/ Washer Relocation Kit, CTS Front Calipers and Rotors, JacFab Ported Intake Manifold, JacFab Intake Manifold Spacer, 80mm Overkill Throttle Body, SS Brake Lines, Ideal Garage Master Cylinder, Monster Twin Disc Clutch, NPP Retrofit w/ Magnaflow Resonated X, ARH Catless Downpipes, JRE Built 3.45 Diff, 1LE Axles, 1LE Hubs, Overkill Tuned, BMR Anti Wheel-hop Kit Stage I, ACS TL1 Hood Insert, ZL1 Spoiler
DSX_Camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2014, 10:12 AM   #33
Can't_C_Me
Don't Sleep on My V6
 
Can't_C_Me's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 C7 1LT
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Oxford, GA
Posts: 3,596
Quote:
Originally Posted by DSX_Camaro View Post
Well, for a few examples... Mercedes has a 2.0T that comes factory with 360hp and 332ftlbs, and on of the tuning companies for Mercedes has a canned tune that adds 50hp and 60ftlbs on top of the already impressive output. And every one of Ford's ecoboost engines has a tune package that adds a good bit of power (I forget horsepower, but usually 50-100ftlbs).

An I4T with a 3" downpipe split to dual 2.5" outlets, an intake and a good tune can hurdle 400hp and maintain its awesome gas mileage. (Also the 2.0T in the Cadillacs and Malibu has already been tuned for an average of 50hp and 50ftlbs stock by one company whom I again forget, and around 80whp by IPF) http://www.cadillacforums.com/forums...rades-ats.html
Not to mention the easy turbo swap you can do for what most are spending for a tune and full exhaust work. Haven't heard of a domestic car that's boosted from factory that is hard to tune or slap on extra hp easily.

Many don't like them but look at the srt 4... That is a beast of a Neon lol.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
__________________
Can't_C_Me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2014, 10:38 AM   #34
DSX_Camaro

 
DSX_Camaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 SW 2LT/RS LFX/AY6
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,741
Exactly. The limiting factor is fueling, nothing more.

I actually think I heard a local SRT4 Neon that had dual 2.5" outlets... man, that thing sounded big.
__________________
K&N CAI, 1LE Strut Tower Brace, Elite Engineering Catch Can and Clean Side Separator, Apex Scoop w/ Washer Relocation Kit, CTS Front Calipers and Rotors, JacFab Ported Intake Manifold, JacFab Intake Manifold Spacer, 80mm Overkill Throttle Body, SS Brake Lines, Ideal Garage Master Cylinder, Monster Twin Disc Clutch, NPP Retrofit w/ Magnaflow Resonated X, ARH Catless Downpipes, JRE Built 3.45 Diff, 1LE Axles, 1LE Hubs, Overkill Tuned, BMR Anti Wheel-hop Kit Stage I, ACS TL1 Hood Insert, ZL1 Spoiler
DSX_Camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2014, 03:05 PM   #35
stoopid

 
Drives: 4 wheels
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: anyplace, USA
Posts: 1,177
Well 50hp/tq would be good with stock parts. 71-82 seems lofty though (?) without additional improvements. Hopefully we're about to find out in a year or so.
stoopid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2014, 03:06 PM   #36
Jason@JacFab
 
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,688
Send a message via AIM to Jason@JacFab Send a message via MSN to Jason@JacFab
Check this out... http://www.cadillacforums.com/forums...ile-times.html

Very minimal mods and this guy is running 12.7's @ 107-109mph in a 2.0 turbo ATS auto... I'd take a turbo 4 cyl camaro over the v6 in a heartbeat



Jason@JacFab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2014, 03:15 PM   #37
GretchenGotGrowl


 
GretchenGotGrowl's Avatar
 
Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 7,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason@JacFab View Post
Check this out... http://www.cadillacforums.com/forums...ile-times.html

Very minimal mods and this guy is running 12.7's @ 107-109mph in a 2.0 turbo ATS auto... I'd take a turbo 4 cyl camaro over the v6 in a heartbeat



Not bad from a 4-banger, not bad at all.
__________________
New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal
Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread
GretchenGotGrowl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2014, 03:44 PM   #38
alvarom123
Love My Camaro! Only 16!
 
alvarom123's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 Camaro 2LS
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Miami,FL
Posts: 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason@JacFab View Post
Check this out... http://www.cadillacforums.com/forums...ile-times.html

Very minimal mods and this guy is running 12.7's @ 107-109mph in a 2.0 turbo ATS auto... I'd take a turbo 4 cyl camaro over the v6 in a heartbeat



Pretty impressive Im actually considering this
__________________
alvarom123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2014, 03:46 PM   #39
BlueN20Camaro
Banned
 
Drives: 1LE LS3
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Miami
Posts: 539
I love the idea. This will be the SRT neon all over again....except without the "neon" look,affordable car that with some time and research can be a solid car.
BlueN20Camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2014, 04:07 PM   #40
Can't_C_Me
Don't Sleep on My V6
 
Can't_C_Me's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 C7 1LT
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Oxford, GA
Posts: 3,596
Like I been saying its going to be a problem when equipped right. That just awesome, I already said it they build it I will get lol.

Nitrous 3.6 ATS vs Tuned 2.0T ATS: http://youtu.be/bhpJNyGiW8c

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
__________________
Can't_C_Me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2014, 06:36 PM   #41
TommyTheCat
SHKE BKE
 
TommyTheCat's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro
Join Date: May 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,108
I absolutely love 4 banger turbos, I just think they don't belong in a muscle car. I know there's no fighting it but nothing puts a bigger smile on your face than getting in a good classic muscle car

Before the purchase I was going to get a mazdaspeed3, hell of a little beast, but a little AWD rumor for next year made me wait and now they discontinued the MS3.


But as long as the Camaro loses some weight, a 4 cyl turbo will do great.

Camaro V6 0-60: 6 seconds, quarter mile: 14.3 seconds
MS3 0-60: 5.3 seconds, quarter mile: 13.8 seconds

I get scared every time a cute little hatch pulls next to me at a stop light! Really need to get some twins
TommyTheCat is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.