Maggie or Whipple for Increasing Low End Torque - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

Gaddism1 · 05-09-2012, 01:57 PM

I am adding a blower cam later this year and I would also like to add a SC. I have heard that the Whipple gives you more low end torque sooner than the Maggie. I was told the Maggie is great but it kicks in on higher RMPs/speed than the Whipple.

Any opinions on this?

bmbbl be · 05-09-2012, 02:27 PM

you have it reversed,,,the maggie is a smaller blower than the whipple

victoryred1ss · 05-09-2012, 02:52 PM

What he said

. Cant go wrong either way imo

600hp-lpe · 05-09-2012, 03:09 PM

they are both great products

10aSSee D · 05-09-2012, 03:33 PM

I have had both and down low they feel the same to me but up top is a different story...

Gaddism1 · 05-09-2012, 04:52 PM

10aSSee D you have a Whipple now from your signature. Do you like the Whipple better?

RSBAD454 · 05-09-2012, 04:55 PM

They both give a lot of low end torque.

camslambam · 05-09-2012, 06:06 PM

Maggie is the low end torque monster.

Slickcas · 05-10-2012, 02:00 AM

Edelbrock e-force has the most low end torque. All in all it's a Maggie with 12 in runners witch give it a lot of low end power.

Fiftydriver · 05-10-2012, 08:57 AM

Take your pick, if your having them installed at a shop, I would say no real difference other then the Whipple can more easily support higher performance levels but with the right kits, the Maggie can support pretty much anything you want on stock or sub 416 CI engine displacements as well.

The Whipple can support larger displacement engines.

If your doing the installation your self, I can tell you the Maggie is very doable for a home garage project. I installed mine with Ted at JRE doing the remote tuning, could not be happier.

Both are great for low end torque, you really can not make a bad decision with these two.

UCI CamaroFan · 05-10-2012, 09:55 AM

I hear the Maggie has more low end torque, but the whipple has more power up top due to it increasing the psi at the higher rpms

05-09-2012, 01:57 PM	#1
Gaddism1 Drives: 2010 SS Inferno Orange MT Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: MA Posts: 82	Maggie or Whipple for Increasing Low End Torque I am adding a blower cam later this year and I would also like to add a SC. I have heard that the Whipple gives you more low end torque sooner than the Maggie. I was told the Maggie is great but it kicks in on higher RMPs/speed than the Whipple. Any opinions on this? __________________ [B][SIZE="3"]

05-09-2012, 02:52 PM	#3
victoryred1ss Drives: 2010 SS M6 2016 2SS A8 Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Utah Posts: 553	What he said . Cant go wrong either way imo __________________ TVS 2300 721RWHP 686RWTQ Built by Me Suspension done by JDP Tune done by JRE

05-09-2012, 03:33 PM	#5
10aSSee D Drives: Silver 2010 SS Camaro Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: TN Posts: 2,562	I have had both and down low they feel the same to me but up top is a different story... __________________ MODS: ADM built 417, 2.9L Whipple with 3.250 pulley, ADM ported and polished LSA heads,ADM stage3 cam,ADM LSA belt drive system,ADM CAI race scoop, ADM dual fuel pumps, ID 850's, BMR full suspension, Gforce 9 inch kit with 3.5 inch driveshaft, Street Slayer twin carbon clutch, Lingenfelter oil seperator. Tuned by built by ADM Performance, 763rwhp,705rwtq

05-09-2012, 04:52 PM	#6
Gaddism1 Drives: 2010 SS Inferno Orange MT Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: MA Posts: 82	10aSSee D you have a Whipple now from your signature. Do you like the Whipple better? __________________ [B][SIZE="3"]

05-09-2012, 04:55 PM	#7
RSBAD454 Procharged Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Somewhere Posts: 361 View My Garage	They both give a lot of low end torque. __________________ 2010 ABM RS/SS with a Procharged LS3, Flowmaster exhaust.

05-09-2012, 02:27 PM	#2
bmbbl be Drives: 2010 CAMARO SS Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: ohio Posts: 1,360	you have it reversed,,,the maggie is a smaller blower than the whipple

05-09-2012, 03:09 PM	#4
600hp-lpe Drives: 2010 Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: NH Posts: 4,788	they are both great products

05-09-2012, 06:06 PM	#8
camslambam Account Suspended Drives: 2010 SS, 06 SRT10 Ram Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: C. America Posts: 1,658	Maggie is the low end torque monster.

05-10-2012, 02:00 AM	#9
Slickcas Drives: 12' 2SS/RS LS3 IBM Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: Odin. ILL Posts: 487 View My Garage	Edelbrock e-force has the most low end torque. All in all it's a Maggie with 12 in runners witch give it a lot of low end power.

05-10-2012, 08:57 AM	#10
Fiftydriver Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SSRS RJT L99 Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Fort Shaw, Montana Posts: 1,242	Take your pick, if your having them installed at a shop, I would say no real difference other then the Whipple can more easily support higher performance levels but with the right kits, the Maggie can support pretty much anything you want on stock or sub 416 CI engine displacements as well. The Whipple can support larger displacement engines. If your doing the installation your self, I can tell you the Maggie is very doable for a home garage project. I installed mine with Ted at JRE doing the remote tuning, could not be happier. Both are great for low end torque, you really can not make a bad decision with these two. __________________ Fiftydriver 2010 SSRS, RJTC, L99, Maggie 2300 SC, 3.4" pulley, Roto-Fab CAI, Dynatech Supermaxx LT headers, Dynatech High Flow cats, Corsa Cat back exhaust, Dual Elite Engineering catch can, MSD wires and Jannetty custom tune, JRE custom diff w/ posi mod, 3.91 LPE gears, Pfaht trailing arms, Pfaht trailing arm and Diff bushings, drop springs and sport sway bars front and back, Fesler dual guage pillar pod w/ AM Cobalt Boost and A/F guages. More to come!!

05-10-2012, 09:55 AM	#11
UCI CamaroFan Zot! Drives: Toyota 4Runner Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Orange County, California Posts: 1,317	I hear the Maggie has more low end torque, but the whipple has more power up top due to it increasing the psi at the higher rpms __________________