Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
dave@hennessey
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-05-2009, 07:01 PM   #1
BackinBlackSS/RS
Go Blue!!!!!
 
BackinBlackSS/RS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Cruze LT
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 23,290
Heatsoak as bad as LS2?

Probably not a lot of information out there about this, but I thought I would get a thread going. My LS2 on my GTO was real bad about heatsoak. I had
a New Era intake on it and it caused a noticable drop in power because of heatsoak. So are you guys gonna leave it stock, go with a closed box system
like the GM performance product or go with open element?
BackinBlackSS/RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2009, 07:18 PM   #2
SAUCE
 
SAUCE's Avatar
 
Drives: 2002 Camaro SS BLKonBLK
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: KC,MO
Posts: 202
Good Question? That is something I have never put alot of thought into!
__________________


2SS RS
CGM
black panel
DT spoiler

Right off the bat:
CAI
FAST LSXr Intake
LT's
SLP loudmouth
SAUCE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2009, 07:22 PM   #3
Vash


 
Drives: 00 Blazer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,104
What do you mean by heatsoak. Splain it Lucy pls.

Talking about intake air temp?
Vash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2009, 07:23 PM   #4
BackinBlackSS/RS
Go Blue!!!!!
 
BackinBlackSS/RS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Cruze LT
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 23,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vash View Post
What do you mean by heatsoak. Splain it Lucy pls.

Talking about intake air temp?
Heatsoak is when the air going into the intake is so hot that you actually
lose power.
BackinBlackSS/RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2009, 08:43 PM   #5
wavrun2000
o come on
 
wavrun2000's Avatar
 
Drives: 06 GTO
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Naples FL
Posts: 437
I assume because there is not a lot of air going into the engine bay and the hood scoops don't work? I would assume the maro would be a little better because i had a larger grill allowing more air in.
__________________
06 GTO with three pedals like it should be
wavrun2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2009, 03:19 AM   #6
THE EVIL TW1N
Banned
 
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
Quote:
Originally Posted by wavrun2000 View Post
I assume because there is not a lot of air going into the engine bay and the hood scoops don't work? I would assume the maro would be a little better because i had a larger grill allowing more air in.
I agree somewhat, but the majority of the airflow actually comes from the bottom. But I do see the grill opening helping compared to the really aerodynamic GTO.
THE EVIL TW1N is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2009, 11:42 AM   #7
Vash


 
Drives: 00 Blazer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,104
Hum only time will tell. I am sure GM tested it's design properly. Much more modern tools nowdays for thermal. I did notice the hole is close to the condenser that might be something to look at just as the closest heat source.
Vash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2009, 01:01 PM   #8
wavrun2000
o come on
 
wavrun2000's Avatar
 
Drives: 06 GTO
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Naples FL
Posts: 437
There is always a hood with a functional hood scoop on it that directs the air to the intake.
__________________
06 GTO with three pedals like it should be
wavrun2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2009, 11:00 PM   #9
gunslinger
 
Drives: 1998 Z28 M6
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 254
Did the GTO's really have that much of a heatsoak problem?

My 1998 Camaro was designed many years earlier and it doesn't seem to have a problem.

Have you measured Intake Air Temperature with a scanning tool when the car is cool versus when it is hot?
__________________
GTR: Get Transmission Replaced
gunslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2009, 11:26 PM   #10
Vr0d
 
Vr0d's Avatar
 
Drives: 04 IBM Pontiac GTO
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 17
Send a message via Yahoo to Vr0d
^^ Yes and no, mine did not suffer but then again I have a 04, which has the LS1. I do have friends that have the LS2 GTOs and they do suffer from this problem.
__________________

2010 CGM LS3 2SS/RS w/ Black Rallys

Vr0d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2009, 11:47 PM   #11
BeermanSS
 
BeermanSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 Cobalt SS/SC
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Wilson, NY
Posts: 214
all you gotta do is tune it a bit, the pcm pulls timing at lower than necessary temp, you can change the IAT Spark table and get rid of the reduction in timing
BeermanSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2009, 12:18 AM   #12
JMAN311

 
JMAN311's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 F-150 Limited
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Parker, CO
Posts: 2,191
Probably not the same type of thing you are talking about but ....

Only heat issues I noticed with the LS1 in my 2000 Camaro SS was that in the summer after driving for extended amounts of time in town (lots of stop and go) there was a VERY noticable difference in the power output. After I replaced the stock thermo w/ an SLP 160degree thermostat I never had issues with power getting robbed from that type of heat...I got the same thermo to help that issue with the LS1 in my vette too....
__________________
There just might be a 2016 Camaro or Corvette in my future...
_____________________________________________
Previous Chevy's
2013 Camaro ZL1 A6|SIM
2010 Camaro 2SS/RS|M6|CGM Exterior|Gray Int
2000 Camaro SS|M6|SLP headers|SLP center mounted quad exhaust|Magnaflow muffler|Hypertech programmed
2001 Corvette|M6|LG Motorsports Headers|Corsa Touring Cat-back|Magnaflow X Pipe|Hurst short-throw|Dyno tuned
JMAN311 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2009, 07:37 AM   #13
SGOS252382


 
SGOS252382's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
Heat soak is a problem with stock tuned LS2s. When driving around on a 90 degree day, power is greatly reduced (sluggish in comparison to 70 degree weather). It has a lot to do with the factory tuning.
Once I got my GTO dyno tuned, my GTO didn't seem to be affected all that much by heat soak.

Also the New Era intake isn't the best choice for an intake. I had a New Era intake on my 05 GTO and it was really down on power with the factory tune. Later New Era made a new version of the intake because there were so many complaints about power loss with stock tuning. I'm not sure if the version 2 Intake worked any better.
I replaced mine with a LPE (Lingenfelter intake) which worked a lot better.

But even running the stock airbox, LS2's are down on power driving around in warm/hot air conditions (summer conditions).


The Corvette guys would know if the LS3 also suffers from these heat soak issues.
SGOS252382 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2009, 12:02 PM   #14
SAUCE
 
SAUCE's Avatar
 
Drives: 2002 Camaro SS BLKonBLK
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: KC,MO
Posts: 202
hmmmm so do you think the 160 thermostat would be a good idea for the new camaro's? or is this not an issue with the ls3?
__________________


2SS RS
CGM
black panel
DT spoiler

Right off the bat:
CAI
FAST LSXr Intake
LT's
SLP loudmouth
SAUCE is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bad news for anyone thinking of installing an aftermarket head unit fastball Audio, Video, Bluetooth, Navigation, Radar, Electronics Forum 26 05-26-2009 10:18 PM
Bad snow BAD! Bumble Bee '77 Off-topic Discussions 32 12-24-2008 05:28 PM
G8 GXP mini review - some good some bad Crowley General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 6 11-26-2008 07:38 AM
bad personal news ChevyNut Off-topic Discussions 4 02-23-2007 11:36 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.