Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Roto-Fab
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-29-2011, 07:05 PM   #1
BiggFoot

 
BiggFoot's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro (M6) 1000+ HP SBE
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,391
Mod the LSA or Sell It And Replace with Supercharged LS7 ???

Ladies and Gents,

Here is where I am struggling and I will need to make a decision fairly soon. I am currently considering two choices and I would like your opinions please along with any supporting information to back your stance:

Turn the LSA into a 417 Stroker with GT-9 or GT-11 cam, forged pistons, 2300 maggie, 10/14 rib pulley upgrade cranking about 750 hp.

OR

Sell the stock 580 HP LSA engine for about $12K and replace with an LS7 block, LS9 heads, forged pistons, GT-9 cam, 10/14 rib pulley upgrade, headers, cranking about 775 HP.

So what do you guys say???
BiggFoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2011, 07:18 PM   #2
91Z28350
 
Drives: 2012 GT500 SVTPP 2010 Traverse LTZ
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Roanoke,TX
Posts: 665
LS7 is a great motor, but if you are going to go with a 427, I have heard the RHS block has thicker cylinder walls and holds up to boost better. There is a reason why GM went with the 6.2 in the ZR1!

One more point, myself, I like the whipple, great whine and from what I have read and seen, the 2.9L Whipple seems to make = or more HP at lower boost and lower IAT, for about the same cost.
91Z28350 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2011, 07:38 PM   #3
Mr. Wyndham
I used to be Dragoneye...
 
Mr. Wyndham's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 31,876
Send a message via AIM to Mr. Wyndham
LS7 block doesn't like boost...very thin cylinder walls to manage that 427ci volume...
__________________
"Keep the faith." - Fbodfather
Mr. Wyndham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2011, 07:44 PM   #4
IOMZL1

 
IOMZL1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Z/28 | 2017 Viper ACR Extreme
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Brownsburg
Posts: 1,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragoneye View Post
LS7 block doesn't like boost...very thin cylinder walls to manage that 427ci volume...
This. And the first post too.
IOMZL1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2011, 07:45 PM   #5
Mr. Wyndham
I used to be Dragoneye...
 
Mr. Wyndham's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 31,876
Send a message via AIM to Mr. Wyndham
Wouldn't the first option be a little less expensive, too?
__________________
"Keep the faith." - Fbodfather
Mr. Wyndham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2011, 07:53 PM   #6
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crazy Coast
Posts: 15,186
LS7 block is relatively expensive. Stroke LSA and call it a day, after your cam ans SC. How much power anyways? Maybe you could get by with rods and pistons on LSA. Same heads as LS9...
__________________

'20 ZL1 Black "Fury"
A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor
Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2011, 07:59 PM   #7
91Z28350
 
Drives: 2012 GT500 SVTPP 2010 Traverse LTZ
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Roanoke,TX
Posts: 665
My understanding also is the LSA block has additional reinforcement in the block over the LS3/LS9 block, though I do not know that for fact, I seem to remember reading it in the description of the LSA motor. If you are going for increased boost, forge the LSA, get a larger twin screw blower or TT and have at it!
91Z28350 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2011, 09:02 PM   #8
GM4lyfe
A GM nut-swinger!
 
GM4lyfe's Avatar
 
Drives: A Car
Join Date: May 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 262
All Al 6.2's should be the same. After the LS9 came out the LS3 got updated to the new casting.
__________________
2004 GTO Quicksilver
2009 G8 Liquid Red
2005 CTS-V Black Raven
GM4lyfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2011, 09:09 PM   #9
GM4lyfe
A GM nut-swinger!
 
GM4lyfe's Avatar
 
Drives: A Car
Join Date: May 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 262
Quote:
Originally Posted by BiggFoot View Post
Ladies and Gents,

Here is where I am struggling and I will need to make a decision fairly soon. I am currently considering two choices and I would like your opinions please along with any supporting information to back your stance:

Turn the LSA into a 417 Stroker with GT-9 or GT-11 cam, forged pistons, 2300 maggie, 10/14 rib pulley upgrade cranking about 750 hp.

OR

Sell the stock 580 HP LSA engine for about $12K and replace with an LS7 block, LS9 heads, forged pistons, GT-9 cam, 10/14 rib pulley upgrade, headers, cranking about 775 HP.

So what do you guys say???
A cheaper option:
Pulley down the stock s/c
Forge pistons, rods
Cam
Tune
Headers
See where that will put ya.

Stock s/c not good enough go with the LS9 s/c. They do it for the CTS-V.

So far what has been offered to the LSA/LS9 is s/c aftermarket inlets and larger heat exchangers net great results.
__________________
2004 GTO Quicksilver
2009 G8 Liquid Red
2005 CTS-V Black Raven
GM4lyfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2011, 09:09 PM   #10
Milk 1027
Camaro➎ moderator
 
Milk 1027's Avatar
 
Drives: '13 BLK 1LE
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: AZ
Posts: 13,567
You can get that much horsepower out of the LSA without spending as much money.
__________________
Milk 1027 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2011, 09:11 PM   #11
GEEo
OKCamaros
 
GEEo's Avatar
 
Drives: 4 banger Diesel
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 4,572
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milk 1027 View Post
You can get that much horsepower out of the LSA without spending as much money.
+1
GEEo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2011, 11:41 PM   #12
payne.jeremy82
 
payne.jeremy82's Avatar
 
Drives: 2002 Lifted Trailblazer
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 51
Lingenfelter is where im going 700+hp at the crank Lingenfelter is the choice for me

Last edited by payne.jeremy82; 09-30-2011 at 01:15 AM.
payne.jeremy82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2011, 12:38 AM   #13
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,372
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
There are better options than the LS7 if you want to swap in a supercharged engine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by payne.jeremy82 View Post
http://www.lingenfelter.com/engine-p...charged-engine-
This is where im going 700+hp at the crank Lingenfelter is the choice for me
I just lost a little respect for Lingenfelter after looking at that URL (link is broken by the way). Someone over there needs to be told that the LS3/L99/LSA/LS9 engines are not 378 cubic inches, because they're not exactly 6.2L ... they're 6.162L, which works out to 376 cubes. I thought they'd be better than that.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2011, 12:47 AM   #14
a_Username


 
a_Username's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS Camaro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 3,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
There are better options than the LS7 if you want to swap in a supercharged engine.
I just lost a little respect for Lingenfelter after looking at that URL (link is broken by the way). Someone over there needs to be told that the LS3/L99/LSA/LS9 engines are not 378 cubic inches, because they're not exactly 6.2L ... they're 6.162L, which works out to 376 cubes. I thought they'd be better than that.
Apparently they listened to ya... I just got "page not found."
a_Username is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.