Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-12-2010, 06:58 PM   #15
2ss black
 
2ss black's Avatar
 
Drives: black2ss
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: pompano beach fl
Posts: 253
hi may be i can of some help i had a muffler delete and x pipe for 4 month now so with that said. you did not lose any power it move to the to the midrang here is what i did to get it back. if you use shell gas stop and fill up with sunoco 93 and do a fuse pull it work for me and a friend who also is a member of this site ps i also put a k&n air filter in my stock air box

Last edited by 2ss black; 07-12-2010 at 07:01 PM. Reason: forgot
2ss black is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2010, 07:20 PM   #16
1badtie

 
1badtie's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro ZL1
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 1,214
i cant even understand what your trying to say man haha
1badtie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2010, 07:34 PM   #17
camarohead
 
camarohead's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 ss rs ls3 red-white rallys
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 729
i have the solo mach x. its for the ls3, which does not have mufflers at the back. when i first installed it, i too thought i had lost some power(TORQUE), but i did the fuse pull and it was back up to speed. guess after the install, it just needed a reset.
camarohead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2010, 06:46 AM   #18
Wilburbeest
Think With Your Dipstick!
 
Wilburbeest's Avatar
 
Drives: 1997 Camaro Z28
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camarorss350 View Post
I recently deleted my resonators and mufflers... Sounds awesome!! Love the loudness! But someone mentioned that i may lose power since there is no back pressure except the cats now. They also said the LS motors are designed to be used with some sort of back pressure. Is this correct?

i will be getting a dyno tune soon and im thinking this will cure the popping and any "power loss"... is this also correct?


My car is a 1ss manual btw...
I'm not going to call your friend a dumbass because he may be very knowledgeable, albeit misguided in this area, but he really needs to think about the logic of his statement. Sometimes on carbed engines if you do free flowing headers/exhaust and don't re-jet the carb you can end up running lean. That will definitely make you loose power and possibly burn valves, but that's not relevant in this case.

Back pressure is what you would get if you stuffed a rag in your exhaust. Not something you want. Positive delta pressure, however, is important because that is what helps suck your exhaust through the pipes. If you did something totally like WTF ridiculous like headers with 2.5" primaries and 5" collectors into straight pipes you'd have a problem because positive delta pressure would be nearly nonexistent, thus lowering velocity, in turn causing your exhaust to flow less even though it's technically capable of flowing more. You would have to do something pretty ridiculous with your exhaust on a 6.2L for that to ever be an issue though. By something pretty ridiculous I mean it doesn't even exist unless you had somebody make it for you (like my example above). With reasonably sized piping, especially with a crossover, you can never loose power from lowering back pressure, only gain. I suggest you read this article because it is the best I've seen on the subject.

http://my.prostreetonline.com/forums...ead.php?t=1639

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott@Bjorn3D View Post
Mine lost all kinds of power being. Ted at Jannety said I needed and X-Pipe to get the cylinder scavenging and engine balace back. Lost anywhere from 30-50HP and 30-TRQ to the back wheels. She would not spin them at all. Put X-Pipe in and she is spinning them again and quicker she got.

The X-Pipe will quiet it down some but mine is still loud with the GMPP Exhaust.
First of all, sorry, there's no way in the world you lost that much power from that alone. Also notice he said you needed SCAVENGING (venturi effect, also called positive delta pressure) NOT BACK-PRESSURE. I'm not sure what all you did but are you sure it could not have affected the O2 sensors or caused the computer to have to relearn? Either one of those would kill your low end because your a/f ratio would be off.
__________________
- Willy

1997 Camaro Z28 (LT1/T56): K&N CAI | Kooks 1 3/4" LTs | 3" Custom Duals | UMI LCAs w/ relocation brackets | UMI adj. panhard bar | UMI adj. torque arm | Koni SA shocks | Strano Springs | Ram Powergrip clutch | Pro 5.0 shifter | skip shift eliminator kit | WS6 Store rotors | Hawk HPS pads

Last edited by Wilburbeest; 07-13-2010 at 06:58 AM.
Wilburbeest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2011, 05:42 PM   #19
Milidin
 
Drives: Black 2011 Camaro 2SS Coupe
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Goodyear, az
Posts: 8
Just had my mufflers replaced with straight pipe on my SS. Without a doubt feels like I lost power. That could either be because I actually did or it just feels like it because the car is louder. Will be putting in on the dyno Mon to compare to my stock dyno.
Milidin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2011, 06:11 PM   #20
kmcd
1,425 hp / supercharged
 
kmcd's Avatar
 
Drives: (2010 2SS/L99) (1999 Corvette)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,104
I have cutouts behind the OEM cats, and I can tell you my 1/4-mile times are consistently .1 to .2 sec faster with the cutouts open. As long as your A/F ratio approximates lambda, there's no way you lose power by flowing more air. You may move the power curve to the right, but there's no way you lose it.


EDIT: You can make the argument that the x-pipe will flow more air than straight pipes because of the scavenging effect, but there's no way you lose power by deleting the mufflers.
__________________
"If it's too loud...well, you know the rest."
kmcd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2011, 06:33 PM   #21
mikeSS


 
mikeSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 c7
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,462
guys stop looking at what you gain at the track or at WOT. when i put high flow cats on, i could feel little power lost not up top, but down low RPMs. i know the cats are different, but still when ever you get more free flowing its at the low RPMs is where you will feel less.
mikeSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2011, 06:44 PM   #22
kmcd
1,425 hp / supercharged
 
kmcd's Avatar
 
Drives: (2010 2SS/L99) (1999 Corvette)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeSS View Post
guys stop looking at what you gain at the track or at WOT. when i put high flow cats on, i could feel little power lost not up top, but down low RPMs. i know the cats are different, but still when ever you get more free flowing its at the low RPMs is where you will feel less.
That's what this means:

Quote:
Originally Posted by kmcd View Post
...You may move the power curve to the right,...
The point is you will not decrease your peak HP by flowing more air, as long as your A/F ratio is still good.
__________________
"If it's too loud...well, you know the rest."
kmcd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 12:26 AM   #23
axis
Search Ninja
 
axis's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central Ark
Posts: 7,183
Damn, this debate is STILL going on. Does anyone not know how to use google?

For one, a muffler delete does absolutely nothing except make your car louder. You take off a pair of straight through mufflers and replace them with staight pipes.

Second, it's been shown by Ted and a few others that the LS motors like to have a crossover inline. Whether it's a H or X pipe is for the most part irrelevant, as long as you have one.

I've yet to see a dyno of new Camaro losing HP because they made their exhaust more free flowing. Teds comparison of the three sizes of the same LT's showed absolutely zero difference down low but the high end was more on the bigger ones. You can't listen to the "old timers" on this one since they are comparing 60's thru 80's cars that were carb'd. Carb'd motors CAN NOT adjust for increased or decreased airflow so they will lose power if you change the airflow from being either too rich or too lean. A modern PCM will adjust the fuel to keep your AFM within the proper range, as long as it's not a massive change. We have people running around here with LT's, no cats and no mufflers that run just fine and picked up a good amount of HP/Tq. That alone should show you that the PCM can make a good amount of adjustments without a problem. Bottom line is, backpressue of any kind isn't needed or wanted. The more free flowing you can make your exhaust, the better off you are, HP wise. This holds true till you've eliminated the exhaust as the bottleneck.
__________________
2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Halltech CF 102 fed
GPI modded intake manifold
Bo (knows) White ported TB
Kooks LT's/ Dynomax VT
Pfadted (springs/sways)
Dyno tuned by Rhino and GPI

I once parallel parked a train.
axis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 12:53 AM   #24
kmcd
1,425 hp / supercharged
 
kmcd's Avatar
 
Drives: (2010 2SS/L99) (1999 Corvette)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by axis View Post
Damn, this debate is STILL going on. Does anyone not know how to use google?

For one, a muffler delete does absolutely nothing except make your car louder. You take off a pair of straight through mufflers and replace them with staight pipes.

Second, it's been shown by Ted and a few others that the LS motors like to have a crossover inline. Whether it's a H or X pipe is for the most part irrelevant, as long as you have one.

I've yet to see a dyno of new Camaro losing HP because they made their exhaust more free flowing. Teds comparison of the three sizes of the same LT's showed absolutely zero difference down low but the high end was more on the bigger ones. You can't listen to the "old timers" on this one since they are comparing 60's thru 80's cars that were carb'd. Carb'd motors CAN NOT adjust for increased or decreased airflow so they will lose power if you change the airflow from being either too rich or too lean. A modern PCM will adjust the fuel to keep your AFM within the proper range, as long as it's not a massive change. We have people running around here with LT's, no cats and no mufflers that run just fine and picked up a good amount of HP/Tq. That alone should show you that the PCM can make a good amount of adjustments without a problem. Bottom line is, backpressue of any kind isn't needed or wanted. The more free flowing you can make your exhaust, the better off you are, HP wise. This holds true till you've eliminated the exhaust as the bottleneck.
Good enough for me. Let's call that a wrap and have a frosty beverage.
__________________
"If it's too loud...well, you know the rest."
kmcd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 12:59 AM   #25
Revo1
Don't Like it? Suggit.
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 14,832
You've still got your massive cats dude. Any loss of power/torque due to the muffler/res delete is your imagination.
__________________

"Tops off, tach up baby- loud and proud!"
A Camaro lover from day one- 1996 3.8 V6 Camaro, to 1996 5.7 LT1 Camaro Z28, to the sold 2002 5.7 LS1 Camaro SS, and NOW, a [I]6.2 L99 VR 2SS/RS: XS Power stainless full exhaust, Airaid CAI, BMR drop springs and sways, custom tune by Cal Speed- 411rwhp
Revo1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2014, 09:29 AM   #26
alvinmiles
 
alvinmiles's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS - Black
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 41
Just deleted my muffler and resonator, i freaking love it. Sounds like an ss should sound. Noticed no loss of power at all.
alvinmiles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2014, 03:36 AM   #27
alvinmiles
 
alvinmiles's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS - Black
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 41
Before


During (muffler delete)


After (muffler & resonator delete)
alvinmiles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2015, 10:24 AM   #28
transFedition
 
transFedition's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS RS
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: 29072
Posts: 1
Alvin,

Is your SS a L99?
transFedition is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anybody Spray'n their SS yet - nitrous ? WeeZee Forced Induction - V8 37 12-29-2012 09:56 PM
Nitrous System ?????s PoleCat2SSRS2010 Forced Induction - V8 29 12-08-2010 05:55 PM
6LE Muffler Delete Kits WITH Double Wall Tips!!! 6LITEREATER V8 Bolt-Ons & Tunes 1 10-30-2009 11:31 PM
DIY at home Muffler Delete for $20 CDBiker220 Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 23 10-12-2009 06:32 PM
Well sunroof question answered (PIC) Black5thgen 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 152 08-29-2009 10:23 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.