07-12-2010, 06:58 PM | #15 |
Drives: black2ss Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: pompano beach fl
Posts: 253
|
hi may be i can of some help i had a muffler delete and x pipe for 4 month now so with that said. you did not lose any power it move to the to the midrang here is what i did to get it back. if you use shell gas stop and fill up with sunoco 93 and do a fuse pull it work for me and a friend who also is a member of this site ps i also put a k&n air filter in my stock air box
Last edited by 2ss black; 07-12-2010 at 07:01 PM. Reason: forgot |
07-12-2010, 07:20 PM | #16 |
Drives: 2018 Camaro ZL1 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 1,214
|
i cant even understand what your trying to say man haha
|
07-12-2010, 07:34 PM | #17 |
Drives: 2010 ss rs ls3 red-white rallys Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 729
|
i have the solo mach x. its for the ls3, which does not have mufflers at the back. when i first installed it, i too thought i had lost some power(TORQUE), but i did the fuse pull and it was back up to speed. guess after the install, it just needed a reset.
|
07-13-2010, 06:46 AM | #18 | ||
Think With Your Dipstick!
Drives: 1997 Camaro Z28 Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 185
|
Quote:
Back pressure is what you would get if you stuffed a rag in your exhaust. Not something you want. Positive delta pressure, however, is important because that is what helps suck your exhaust through the pipes. If you did something totally like WTF ridiculous like headers with 2.5" primaries and 5" collectors into straight pipes you'd have a problem because positive delta pressure would be nearly nonexistent, thus lowering velocity, in turn causing your exhaust to flow less even though it's technically capable of flowing more. You would have to do something pretty ridiculous with your exhaust on a 6.2L for that to ever be an issue though. By something pretty ridiculous I mean it doesn't even exist unless you had somebody make it for you (like my example above). With reasonably sized piping, especially with a crossover, you can never loose power from lowering back pressure, only gain. I suggest you read this article because it is the best I've seen on the subject. http://my.prostreetonline.com/forums...ead.php?t=1639 Quote:
__________________
- Willy
1997 Camaro Z28 (LT1/T56): K&N CAI | Kooks 1 3/4" LTs | 3" Custom Duals | UMI LCAs w/ relocation brackets | UMI adj. panhard bar | UMI adj. torque arm | Koni SA shocks | Strano Springs | Ram Powergrip clutch | Pro 5.0 shifter | skip shift eliminator kit | WS6 Store rotors | Hawk HPS pads Last edited by Wilburbeest; 07-13-2010 at 06:58 AM. |
||
09-17-2011, 05:42 PM | #19 |
Drives: Black 2011 Camaro 2SS Coupe Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Goodyear, az
Posts: 8
|
Just had my mufflers replaced with straight pipe on my SS. Without a doubt feels like I lost power. That could either be because I actually did or it just feels like it because the car is louder. Will be putting in on the dyno Mon to compare to my stock dyno.
|
09-17-2011, 06:11 PM | #20 |
1,425 hp / supercharged
Drives: (2010 2SS/L99) (1999 Corvette) Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,104
|
I have cutouts behind the OEM cats, and I can tell you my 1/4-mile times are consistently .1 to .2 sec faster with the cutouts open. As long as your A/F ratio approximates lambda, there's no way you lose power by flowing more air. You may move the power curve to the right, but there's no way you lose it.
EDIT: You can make the argument that the x-pipe will flow more air than straight pipes because of the scavenging effect, but there's no way you lose power by deleting the mufflers.
__________________
"If it's too loud...well, you know the rest."
|
09-17-2011, 06:33 PM | #21 |
Drives: 2015 c7 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,462
|
guys stop looking at what you gain at the track or at WOT. when i put high flow cats on, i could feel little power lost not up top, but down low RPMs. i know the cats are different, but still when ever you get more free flowing its at the low RPMs is where you will feel less.
|
09-17-2011, 06:44 PM | #22 | |
1,425 hp / supercharged
Drives: (2010 2SS/L99) (1999 Corvette) Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,104
|
Quote:
The point is you will not decrease your peak HP by flowing more air, as long as your A/F ratio is still good.
__________________
"If it's too loud...well, you know the rest."
|
|
09-18-2011, 12:26 AM | #23 |
Search Ninja
Drives: 2010 Black 2SS/RS A6 Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central Ark
Posts: 7,183
|
Damn, this debate is STILL going on. Does anyone not know how to use google?
For one, a muffler delete does absolutely nothing except make your car louder. You take off a pair of straight through mufflers and replace them with staight pipes. Second, it's been shown by Ted and a few others that the LS motors like to have a crossover inline. Whether it's a H or X pipe is for the most part irrelevant, as long as you have one. I've yet to see a dyno of new Camaro losing HP because they made their exhaust more free flowing. Teds comparison of the three sizes of the same LT's showed absolutely zero difference down low but the high end was more on the bigger ones. You can't listen to the "old timers" on this one since they are comparing 60's thru 80's cars that were carb'd. Carb'd motors CAN NOT adjust for increased or decreased airflow so they will lose power if you change the airflow from being either too rich or too lean. A modern PCM will adjust the fuel to keep your AFM within the proper range, as long as it's not a massive change. We have people running around here with LT's, no cats and no mufflers that run just fine and picked up a good amount of HP/Tq. That alone should show you that the PCM can make a good amount of adjustments without a problem. Bottom line is, backpressue of any kind isn't needed or wanted. The more free flowing you can make your exhaust, the better off you are, HP wise. This holds true till you've eliminated the exhaust as the bottleneck.
__________________
2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Halltech CF 102 fed GPI modded intake manifold Bo (knows) White ported TB Kooks LT's/ Dynomax VT Pfadted (springs/sways) Dyno tuned by Rhino and GPI I once parallel parked a train. |
09-18-2011, 12:53 AM | #24 | |
1,425 hp / supercharged
Drives: (2010 2SS/L99) (1999 Corvette) Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,104
|
Quote:
__________________
"If it's too loud...well, you know the rest."
|
|
09-18-2011, 12:59 AM | #25 |
Don't Like it? Suggit.
|
You've still got your massive cats dude. Any loss of power/torque due to the muffler/res delete is your imagination.
__________________
"Tops off, tach up baby- loud and proud!" A Camaro lover from day one- 1996 3.8 V6 Camaro, to 1996 5.7 LT1 Camaro Z28, to the sold 2002 5.7 LS1 Camaro SS, and NOW, a [I]6.2 L99 VR 2SS/RS: XS Power stainless full exhaust, Airaid CAI, BMR drop springs and sways, custom tune by Cal Speed- 411rwhp |
12-18-2014, 09:29 AM | #26 |
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS - Black Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 41
|
Just deleted my muffler and resonator, i freaking love it. Sounds like an ss should sound. Noticed no loss of power at all.
|
12-19-2014, 03:36 AM | #27 | |||
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS - Black Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 41
|
Before
During (muffler delete) After (muffler & resonator delete) |
|||
06-04-2015, 10:24 AM | #28 |
Drives: 2010 2SS RS Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: 29072
Posts: 1
|
Alvin,
Is your SS a L99? |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anybody Spray'n their SS yet - nitrous ? | WeeZee | Forced Induction - V8 | 37 | 12-29-2012 09:56 PM |
Nitrous System ?????s | PoleCat2SSRS2010 | Forced Induction - V8 | 29 | 12-08-2010 05:55 PM |
6LE Muffler Delete Kits WITH Double Wall Tips!!! | 6LITEREATER | V8 Bolt-Ons & Tunes | 1 | 10-30-2009 11:31 PM |
DIY at home Muffler Delete for $20 | CDBiker220 | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 23 | 10-12-2009 06:32 PM |
Well sunroof question answered (PIC) | Black5thgen | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 152 | 08-29-2009 10:23 PM |