12.843 and i got beat by a stock 5.0 - Page 2 - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

newmoon · 10-15-2013, 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jkof08

21' inch wheel option street tires 285's in the back 255's in the front launching at 1900 any harder gets wheel spin. The track was well preped for a private event do it was sticky I had glue on my tires in the pits

18" DRs should get you into the 12:50s

alcal1084 · 10-15-2013, 01:11 PM

How much does the driver weigh? My girlfriend has consistently run my car .1 fast then me because she weighs 100 pounds less it makes a difference also his MPH says he makes more power!!!

vroomapunk · 10-15-2013, 01:11 PM

Hell if you look at the fast list. na L99 is capable (in the most extreme situation) lol, of 12.22 with bolt ons alone.

Add DR's , gears, and a converter to that, its capable of 11.74 or 11.78.

These are extreme examples, but you get the idea. Your time should be much better

alcal1084 · 10-15-2013, 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by newmoon

18" DRs should get you into the 12:50s

I would put him at 12.2 with DRs

Juice2SS · 10-15-2013, 01:41 PM

Your MPH is WAY low. I have craptastic 1 3/4" knock off headers and no converter. I am putting in 114 MPH passes. Put on some wheels and see what happens. With a good set of wheels and tires, you'll probably have to adjust the shift points. When you lose the weight in the wheels, it tends to hit the limiter easier.

trw427ss · 10-15-2013, 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vroomapunk

Hell if you look at the fast list. na L99 is capable (in the most extreme situation) lol, of 12.22 with bolt ons alone.

Add DR's , gears, and a converter to that, its capable of 11.74 or 11.78.

These are extreme examples, but you get the idea. Your time should be much better

I guess #2 is a real extreme example!

LOL

E.T. · 10-15-2013, 02:32 PM

Losing those huge wheels would help. I'd say your car is running fine, though. When I had full bolt-ons and 3.70 gears, I was running 12.8x @ 109mph...pretty much the same as you. There's room for improvement with better 60' times and better tires.

You sure the 'stang was totally stock? My buddy ran his last month and got around 14 sec. I think he took someone down the track with him, so he had added weight. Also, it was a manual, so he probably needs to work on his shifts.

vroomapunk · 10-15-2013, 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trw427ss

I guess #2 is a real extreme example!

LOL

Hahaha

Didnt use you as an example for this particular thread cause you had the pulley, not that it takes off a tenth by itself but you know haha.

Quote:

Originally Posted by E.T.

Losing those huge wheels would help. I'd say your car is running fine, though. When I had full bolt-ons and 3.70 gears, I was running 12.8x @ 109mph...pretty much the same as you. There's room for improvement with better 60' times and better tires.

You sure the 'stang was totally stock? My buddy ran his last month and got around 14 sec. I think he took someone down the track with him, so he had added weight. Also, it was a manual, so he probably needs to work on his shifts.

I was also thinking there was a chance of the stang not being completely stock. Intake, or tune, etc that you couldnt really see or hear necesarily. Not that a stock 5.0 isnt capable of those times...

Unobtainium · 10-15-2013, 02:36 PM

The worst part is once the 5.0 is modded...
Same dyno as the one I use, headers and CAI/tune new 5.0's put down 365whp to my 331whp. they rev higher, so more power is not a surprise, but the torque they make is so close in some spots. Technology...
Believe me, I love my Camaro, but I wasn't so turned off by the 5.0's looks, I'd own one for sure. The new ones are really a step up though. Best looking so far.

vroomapunk · 10-15-2013, 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unobtainium

The worst part is once the 5.0 is modded...
Same dyno as the one I use, headers and CAI/tune new 5.0's put down 365whp to my 331whp. they rev higher, so more power is not a surprise, but the torque they make is so close in some spots. Technology...

Conservative dyno? I put down 376/392 with headers, cai, tune, L99, on a middle of the road dyno.

litle88 · 10-15-2013, 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jkof08

ok so i have the below mods in the sig and i raced a stock 2013 mustang 5.0, he beat me, i want to know what my issue was. i had a quicker 60 ft, 330ft and 1/8th, then he had a quicker 1000ft and 1/4 mile. why is this, shouldnt i pull in the top end bc of my mods? this makes me wonder should i have the engine cleaned out and add a catch can or is it something else? it was tuned by jannetty. any help would be appriciated Im number 17 on the left.

Data log your car, make Ted earn that money. Your Trans tune could because little off too.

Unobtainium · 10-15-2013, 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vroomapunk

Conservative dyno? I put down 376/392 with headers, cai, tune, L99, on a middle of the road dyno.

Yes, Mustang Dyno. L99's are 29X's stock.
Owners shop car does 9.40's n/a with 510whp! It's not that light either. 3260 with him in it.

E.T. · 10-15-2013, 02:57 PM

I was in the the 350-360 HP/TQ range with full bolt-ons and L99.

K32 Camaro · 10-15-2013, 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unobtainium

Yes, Mustang Dyno. L99's are 29X's stock.
Owners shop car does 9.40's n/a with 510whp! It's not that light either. 3260 with him in it.

That's almost 1000lbs lighter than mine....

10-15-2013, 01:11 PM	#17
vroomapunk [COTW 5/12/14] Drives: 2012 CRT NF Cammed 2SS/RS For Sale Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: NOLA Posts: 6,115 View My Garage	Hell if you look at the fast list. na L99 is capable (in the most extreme situation) lol, of 12.22 with bolt ons alone. Add DR's , gears, and a converter to that, its capable of 11.74 or 11.78. These are extreme examples, but you get the idea. Your time should be much better Attached Images __________________

10-15-2013, 02:32 PM	#21
E.T. Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Cleveland, OH Posts: 3,267	Losing those huge wheels would help. I'd say your car is running fine, though. When I had full bolt-ons and 3.70 gears, I was running 12.8x @ 109mph...pretty much the same as you. There's room for improvement with better 60' times and better tires. You sure the 'stang was totally stock? My buddy ran his last month and got around 14 sec. I think he took someone down the track with him, so he had added weight. Also, it was a manual, so he probably needs to work on his shifts. __________________

10-15-2013, 02:36 PM	#23
Unobtainium Fabricator Drives: 2011 2SS Summit White Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Langdon, AB Posts: 505	The worst part is once the 5.0 is modded... Same dyno as the one I use, headers and CAI/tune new 5.0's put down 365whp to my 331whp. they rev higher, so more power is not a surprise, but the torque they make is so close in some spots. Technology... Believe me, I love my Camaro, but I wasn't so turned off by the 5.0's looks, I'd own one for sure. The new ones are really a step up though. Best looking so far. __________________ Roto-fab CAI Unobtainium Welding Exhaust ARH LT's 393whp L99 GPI VVT Turbo Cam-in

10-15-2013, 02:57 PM	#27
E.T. Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Cleveland, OH Posts: 3,267	I was in the the 350-360 HP/TQ range with full bolt-ons and L99. __________________

10-15-2013, 01:11 PM	#16
alcal1084 Drives: 2012 45TH AE SS Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Las Vegas Posts: 553	How much does the driver weigh? My girlfriend has consistently run my car .1 fast then me because she weighs 100 pounds less it makes a difference also his MPH says he makes more power!!!

10-15-2013, 01:41 PM	#19
Juice2SS Drives: 2011 2SS Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: DFW, TX Posts: 931	Your MPH is WAY low. I have craptastic 1 3/4" knock off headers and no converter. I am putting in 114 MPH passes. Put on some wheels and see what happens. With a good set of wheels and tires, you'll probably have to adjust the shift points. When you lose the weight in the wheels, it tends to hit the limiter easier.