2010 camaro v6 vrs 1999 mustang 5.0 manual - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

camaro2lt · 03-24-2013, 09:09 PM

Hey guys I have a 2010 camaro v6 auto with mace 25mm,ported intake manifold,ported tb,bbk CAI,trifecta tune and a flowmaster exhaust......vrs a 1999 mustang v8 with a manual transmission and axle back exhaust. Who would win from a 0 to 100mph race?

chicagobulls · 03-24-2013, 09:22 PM

U

Decepticon21 · 03-24-2013, 10:10 PM

I went against a mustang cobra manual 5.0 I believe late 90's early looking 00' had cai an exhaust work judging bbk by his sticker lol. That's all I could figure out by just looking. Anyways short an to the point I had cai and trifecta tune in sport mode. Close but got the jump an slowly turned a half car link to car n half!

so I say you from experience.

08-G35s/6MT · 03-25-2013, 01:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by camaro2lt

Hey guys I have a 2010 camaro v6 auto with mace 25mm,ported intake manifold,ported tb,bbk CAI,trifecta tune and a flowmaster exhaust......vrs a 1999 mustang v8 with a manual transmission and axle back exhaust. Who would win from a 0 to 100mph race?

2v's are dig cars, they are slow from a roll. He will get you if he hooks, your best bet would be a roll race! Good luck!

MichaelH · 03-25-2013, 11:35 AM

You should win I've raced one with my mods in my sig and I just kept walking him from the start. All I know the guy had was an exhaust

Deki · 03-25-2013, 07:22 PM

There was no 5.0 in 99. Driver's race vs. a 99 GT in a lightly modded V6. A Cobra of any year will beat you.

302-412 · 03-25-2013, 08:37 PM

Yea 99 was the first 260 hp 4.62v, big difference between a 99 and a 98.

fielderLS3 · 03-25-2013, 08:50 PM

99 Mustang GT should have a slight edge. In a 1999 MT review, a 1999 GT did 14.0@100mph. The 4.6L 2v may have only had 260 hp, but it had about 300 ft-lbs of torque, and only weighed around 3250.

Dropspeed · 03-25-2013, 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fielderLS3

99 Mustang GT should have a slight edge. In a 1999 MT review, a 1999 GT did 14.0@100mph. The 4.6L 2v may have only had 260 hp, but it had about 300 ft-lbs of torque, and only weighed around 3250.

In the family we have a 2000 GT vert, Automatic, 4.6, 2v with the only mods being 4:10 gear, exhaust, CDC shaker hood (CAI) and 295s out back...It runs 13.4s with no other mods. Even the convertible is under 3400lbs.

It is awful from most rolls and has no top end.....but it is a great cruiser and a killer stop light car.

Deki · 03-26-2013, 02:02 AM

^ Wow that looks pretty bad ass. Nice ride. What kind of wheels are those?

camaro2lt · 03-26-2013, 05:35 PM

now that i think about it his car is a 1995 not a 1999

08-G35s/6MT · 03-26-2013, 05:57 PM

Makes sense, the SN95 5.0's are turds........ 15.9 seconds stock with good driver and manual, 15.5 with some bolt ons and driver mod.

Full bolt ons(headers/cai/exhaust/etc.) they put down 180-190 whp.

DarkneSS · 03-27-2013, 05:08 PM

Most probably aren't well maintained and definitely aren't running 100%, you got this...

KMPrenger · 03-27-2013, 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by camaro2lt

now that i think about it his car is a 1995 not a 1999

You'll kill it.

If it was the 99 - 04 model then it would be more of a drivers race with advantage to it from a dig, but you from a roll.

03-24-2013, 09:09 PM	#1
camaro2lt Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT VR/RS CGM Rally's Join Date: May 2009 Location: Palmyra, PA Posts: 5,675 View My Garage	2010 camaro v6 vrs 1999 mustang 5.0 manual Hey guys I have a 2010 camaro v6 auto with mace 25mm,ported intake manifold,ported tb,bbk CAI,trifecta tune and a flowmaster exhaust......vrs a 1999 mustang v8 with a manual transmission and axle back exhaust. Who would win from a 0 to 100mph race?

03-25-2013, 11:35 AM	#5
MichaelH SOCAL HT5 Drives: 2013 BRM ZL1 M6 Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: NE Ohio Posts: 1,495 View My Garage	You should win I've raced one with my mods in my sig and I just kept walking him from the start. All I know the guy had was an exhaust __________________ 2013 ZL1 M6 - Mods-in the works Old vehicles 2010 CGM Camaro (sold) Other Vehicles: 2008 Kawasaki ZX6R-115 RWHP in mid summer 2006 Chevy Trailblazer SS- For Sale; Lots of extras

03-25-2013, 07:22 PM	#6
Deki Drives: 2018 Mustang GT Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: Phoenix, AZ Posts: 1,764 View My Garage	There was no 5.0 in 99. Driver's race vs. a 99 GT in a lightly modded V6. A Cobra of any year will beat you. __________________ 2018 Mustang GT

03-25-2013, 08:50 PM	#8
fielderLS3 Drives: 2016 Mazda6, 2011 Mustang 5.0 Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Portage, Wisconsin Posts: 4,049	99 Mustang GT should have a slight edge. In a 1999 MT review, a 1999 GT did 14.0@100mph. The 4.6L 2v may have only had 260 hp, but it had about 300 ft-lbs of torque, and only weighed around 3250. __________________ 2022 1SS 1LE (Arrived 4/29/22) "The car is the closest thing we will ever create to something that is alive." . 2022 1SS 1LE (Coming Soon)

03-26-2013, 02:02 AM	#10
Deki Drives: 2018 Mustang GT Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: Phoenix, AZ Posts: 1,764 View My Garage	^ Wow that looks pretty bad ass. Nice ride. What kind of wheels are those? __________________ 2018 Mustang GT

03-24-2013, 09:22 PM	#2
chicagobulls one car wolfpack Drives: 2010 Camaro V6 Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Illinois Posts: 1,226	U

03-24-2013, 10:10 PM	#3
Decepticon21 Drives: 2010 Camaro v6 Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Barberton, Ohio Posts: 283	I went against a mustang cobra manual 5.0 I believe late 90's early looking 00' had cai an exhaust work judging bbk by his sticker lol. That's all I could figure out by just looking. Anyways short an to the point I had cai and trifecta tune in sport mode. Close but got the jump an slowly turned a half car link to car n half! so I say you from experience.

03-25-2013, 08:37 PM	#7
302-412 Drives: 2013 Ram Express Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Seguin Texas Posts: 228	Yea 99 was the first 260 hp 4.62v, big difference between a 99 and a 98.

03-26-2013, 05:35 PM	#11
camaro2lt Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT VR/RS CGM Rally's Join Date: May 2009 Location: Palmyra, PA Posts: 5,675 View My Garage	now that i think about it his car is a 1995 not a 1999

03-26-2013, 05:57 PM	#12
08-G35s/6MT Drives: racecars Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: BMN Posts: 1,776	Makes sense, the SN95 5.0's are turds........ 15.9 seconds stock with good driver and manual, 15.5 with some bolt ons and driver mod. Full bolt ons(headers/cai/exhaust/etc.) they put down 180-190 whp.

03-27-2013, 05:08 PM	#13
DarkneSS Account Suspended Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS 6MT Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Westchester, New York Posts: 3,715	Most probably aren't well maintained and definitely aren't running 100%, you got this...