01-21-2009, 04:41 PM | #1 |
Drives: 2010 Blue Camaro RS Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 507
|
Camaro Hatchback?
How many of you think the Camaro should have been a hatchback as it was in recent years. Im not talking about a different looking camaro just a cargo area where the trunk and rear glass lift up together. It would create a cool open cockpit like they had in the last 2 previous gens and it would give the appearance of a more usable cargo area. Not complaining, I just thought it might be fun to think about. Any thoughts? or anyone wanting to create a better shop or image ?
|
01-21-2009, 04:45 PM | #2 |
Drives: Like a bat outta hell Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Miami
Posts: 25
|
I actually prefer the trunk, gives the car cleaner lines.
|
01-21-2009, 04:45 PM | #3 |
Petro-sexual
|
Eh; honestly, I'm tired of the hatchback. But hey - to each his own
__________________
'20 ZL1 Black "Fury" A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs |
01-21-2009, 04:47 PM | #4 |
Drives: 2010 Blue Camaro RS Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 507
|
The LOOK of the car would be exactly the SAME except there would be a cut in the roof above the rear glass..... In my mind anyway.
|
01-21-2009, 04:58 PM | #5 | |
Force RECON
Drives: 2005 Saab 9-5 2.3T Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Terre Haute, IN
Posts: 1,687
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
01-21-2009, 05:01 PM | #6 |
|
I like the trunk. Never really liked the hatchback. Plus the "69" didn't have a hatchback.
|
01-21-2009, 05:08 PM | #7 |
Drives: 2006 Cobalt, 2004 Taurus wagon Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 3,812
|
Why should it matter if the 69 had a hatchback? This is 2009. If you only want to go by what the 1969 model was, go buy a 1969 model and call it a day. That said, I think the trunk offers rigidity and security benefits (though I'm just guessing on the rigidity thing. Any engineer may feel free to correct me) but the small trunk opening is a bit disappointing. The setup illustrated here seems to work fairly well with the Scion tC, so I think it is a pretty good idea.
__________________
"It's kind of fun to do the impossible" - Walt Disney
There's a great big beautiful tomorrow shining at the end of every day There's a great big beautiful tomorrow Just a dream away |
01-21-2009, 05:11 PM | #8 |
Drives: the 2nd amendment home Join Date: May 2008
Location: OK
Posts: 14,707
|
It would weaken the structure. since we're going for handling this time around I'll take the trunk.
|
01-21-2009, 05:12 PM | #9 | |
Tame Racing Driver
Drives: M3 Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Philly Area
Posts: 51
|
Quote:
|
|
01-21-2009, 05:19 PM | #10 |
MOD SQUAD
|
Trunk...
__________________
Who cares about the Blue Oval crowd and their little Ponys? We're getting our Camaro back-and it'll be Supercharged!-MDAII Team LS3 |
01-21-2009, 05:24 PM | #11 |
Drives: V45 Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,270
|
I've always liked a seperate trunk more than hatchbacks, can't tell you why I just do
|
01-21-2009, 05:28 PM | #12 |
Drives: The Larkvillemobile Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Denver Suburbs
Posts: 188
|
In this case, absolutely I would have preferred a hatch. Nice sketch of how it would work too.
That's what gave Camaro it's uniqueness the past few generations, midsize cars rarely have this feature but even the fifth gen's design looks like it would take to a hatch feature well. Oh well... |
01-21-2009, 05:31 PM | #13 | ||
Drives: 96 Z28(sold) Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Texas, Fla
Posts: 616
|
Quote:
So with that.... HIS interpretation of a 2010 CAMARO is with a hatch..
__________________
Quote:
|
||
01-21-2009, 05:33 PM | #14 |
Drives: 2010 IBM SS/RS Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 805
|
i wouldn't mind the hatchback... the stereo would be a lot louder with some subs in the back.
__________________
**sold** 2010 2SS/RS, 6spd manual, imperial blue metallic w/black leather
Blacked out tail/signal lights, 5% rear tint, 20% sides, Dynomax Bullet mufflers, Barton short throw shifter, Clear Image offroad downpipes |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A Message to all Fbody Enthusiasts | TAG UR IT | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 12 | 02-02-2013 07:41 PM |
GM memo to dealers | Moose | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 41 | 02-04-2010 07:33 PM |
UPCOMING CAMARO IMPORTANT DATES | CamaroScotty | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 125 | 01-11-2009 12:31 AM |
Camaro Accessories from SEMA | FenwickHockey65 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 1 | 11-03-2008 02:25 PM |
Camaro observations to put the price in perspective | MajorTom | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 13 | 10-16-2008 07:28 PM |