Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction Discussions


Phastek Performance


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-04-2017, 09:33 AM   #43
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chevy71 View Post
When you say it's done at 575whp what is done? Do you lose low side PSI or only high side? I am seeing a lot of people in the 600's with no fuel issues and no fuel update. There is so much conflicting information on here it's hard to really know what to trust. I want to learn from others and their experiences, but I may just have to see it myself on the dyno.
When I say done, anyone would be a fool to try and stretch that at sea level on an accurate dyno.

You only have 6 milliseconds to inject all your fuel during the cycle,

The size of the injectors determines how much fuel can be injected in 6 milliseconds.

The high pressure pump falls off hard.

Understand the high pressure pump is a positive displacement pump it will only pump it's own volume Period.

Yes you can increase the stroke of the pump via the cam lobe but you don't get 30% more fuel form a 30% lobe.

I mean this with all due respect but from reading all your posts it appears you trying to get blood out of a stone.

The fuel system is the most important part of your build that is where you spend your money before all the other bells and whistles.

I Hope this clears the air a bit.

Ted
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 37 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2017, 07:15 AM   #44
LesBaer
FMPG
 
LesBaer's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 2SS
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: CT
Posts: 1,888
I think he's not understanding that there are two things to worry about - octane and volume of fuel.
__________________
Ordered 3/8/16- NFG/Ceramic White, M6, MRC, NPP, 6 pots, blk blade, no sunroof, blk splitter, blk bow ties, dark tails, nav.
ARH 1 7/8" ceramic coated full sys w/NPP; Maggie 9.2psi (85mm); Jannetty rough idle cam(TSP), tune and LT4 fuel system; Forgeline VX1 Black PVD (20x10,11); R88R 315's; ALPriority; BMR rear arms, bushings, DS loop; RF intake (red); nGauge

93 octane: 712rwhp, 654rwtq / E85 (E66 mix): 734rwhp, 674rwtq (SuperFlow Dyno)
LesBaer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2017, 04:01 PM   #45
SSFanboy
 
SSFanboy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro A8 2SS w/Maggie
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Plano,TX.
Posts: 63
The 575whp comments are scaring me. I recently had a CAM (w/32% lobe) and 90mm pulley upgrade on my Maggie. I'm getting about 568whp on a DynoJet with 8psi. The shop says I can go to an 85mm pulley and get an additional 20hp at 10psi. Without a fuel system upgrade, is that going to be pushing it and possibly causing a lean condition that could be disastrous for my LT1 engine? I'm at 450ft above seal level in North Texas. Should I hold off on the pulley upgrade?
SSFanboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2017, 04:19 PM   #46
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by SSFanboy View Post
The 575whp comments are scaring me. I recently had a CAM (w/32% lobe) and 90mm pulley upgrade on my Maggie. I'm getting about 568whp on a DynoJet with 8psi. The shop says I can go to an 85mm pulley and get an additional 20hp at 10psi. Without a fuel system upgrade, is that going to be pushing it and possibly causing a lean condition that could be disastrous for my LT1 engine? I'm at 450ft above seal level in North Texas. Should I hold off on the pulley upgrade?
Remember what you can get away with on the dyno will be more that you can get away with on the track.

Ted.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 37 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2017, 05:47 PM   #47
Chevy71

 
Chevy71's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 2SS
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 977
Quote:
Originally Posted by LesBaer View Post
I think he's not understanding that there are two things to worry about - octane and volume of fuel.
I do understand and have worked with this style fuel system for years. That's why my statements about the HPFP only boosting pressure from the volume it's given by the LPFP and why am I changing a HPFP but leaving the low side; keeps getting repeated. If pump gas octane was an issue, why would we have so many factory cars exceeding the HP this forum is listing as a limit to the power? I've seen countless hellcats run 680's on pump gas unaided just to name one. Octane isn't stopping that tsunami of a fuel system they run haha
Chevy71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2017, 06:05 PM   #48
Chevy71

 
Chevy71's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 2SS
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 977
Quote:
Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING View Post
When I say done, anyone would be a fool to try and stretch that at sea level on an accurate dyno.

You only have 6 milliseconds to inject all your fuel during the cycle,

The size of the injectors determines how much fuel can be injected in 6 milliseconds.

The high pressure pump falls off hard.

Understand the high pressure pump is a positive displacement pump it will only pump it's own volume Period.

Yes you can increase the stroke of the pump via the cam lobe but you don't get 30% more fuel form a 30% lobe.

I mean this with all due respect but from reading all your posts it appears you trying to get blood out of a stone.

The fuel system is the most important part of your build that is where you spend your money before all the other bells and whistles.

I Hope this clears the air a bit.

Ted
Please don't take my questions as arguing, I'm just trying to clear this up in my mind.
I agree, the pump can only move the volume it's supplied by the low side, and that LT1 pump is a fixed 5.7mm pump that boost the psi of the fuel that's already there. The rate that pump moves fuel is a factor in how much fuel goes to the injectors per fueling cycle. Increasing that open rate with a fuel lobe on a cam will increase the fuel it moves, especially if the pumps piston cycle does not go full stroke from the factory, which we all know is very possible. The LT4 pump is .2 bigger.. it will move more and make more psi, but it won't take much to reach the max in that as well. I'm not trying to bleed a stone, it just doesn't match all the DI engines I have dyno'd for commercial abuse that run 90-105 percent load around the clock. I'm not saying one of the pumps or injectors in one car isn't weaker/stronger than the next or a car certainly can surpass your bench mark on HP, I just feel like each system needs tested to truly find the mark where changes are needed, and how big of a change is needed to correct it.
Chevy71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2017, 07:00 PM   #49
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chevy71 View Post
I do understand and have worked with this style fuel system for years. That's why my statements about the HPFP only boosting pressure from the volume it's given by the LPFP and why am I changing a HPFP but leaving the low side; keeps getting repeated. If pump gas octane was an issue, why would we have so many factory cars exceeding the HP this forum is listing as a limit to the power? I've seen countless hellcats run 680's on pump gas unaided just to name one. Octane isn't stopping that tsunami of a fuel system they run haha
Each engine combination will have a different HP threshold on pump gas.

We make over 700 RWHP with ZL-1 on pump gas because of low compression.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 37 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2017, 07:07 PM   #50
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chevy71 View Post
Please don't take my questions as arguing, I'm just trying to clear this up in my mind.
I agree, the pump can only move the volume it's supplied by the low side, and that LT1 pump is a fixed 5.7mm pump that boost the psi of the fuel that's already there. The rate that pump moves fuel is a factor in how much fuel goes to the injectors per fueling cycle. Increasing that open rate with a fuel lobe on a cam will increase the fuel it moves, especially if the pumps piston cycle does not go full stroke from the factory, which we all know is very possible. The LT4 pump is .2 bigger.. it will move more and make more psi, but it won't take much to reach the max in that as well. I'm not trying to bleed a stone, it just doesn't match all the DI engines I have dyno'd for commercial abuse that run 90-105 percent load around the clock. I'm not saying one of the pumps or injectors in one car isn't weaker/stronger than the next or a car certainly can surpass your bench mark on HP, I just feel like each system needs tested to truly find the mark where changes are needed, and how big of a change is needed to correct it.
I look at fuel system as the foundation on which the house is built.

I start with a solid foundation then build the house.

I see too many people building a Mansion on a stone wall.

Just trying to help.

Ted.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 37 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2017, 08:37 PM   #51
Chevy71

 
Chevy71's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 2SS
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 977
Quote:
Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING View Post
I look at fuel system as the foundation on which the house is built.

I start with a solid foundation then build the house.

I see too many people building a Mansion on a stone wall.

Just trying to help.

Ted.
All appreciated as well. I agree the fuel system is very important.
Chevy71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2017, 10:14 AM   #52
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chevy71 View Post
All appreciated as well. I agree the fuel system is very important.
Fuel supply is the foundation of all builds, without it your house will crumble.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 37 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2018, 09:24 AM   #53
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,225
Love this build, really good power on low boost.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 37 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2018, 03:22 PM   #54
asthmamax11
 
asthmamax11's Avatar
 
Drives: 1SS Summit White 6 speed
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Gainesville GA
Posts: 579
Ted
Can this car consistently make those #'s without a significant cool down ?
__________________
16 1SS M6 White
Magnuson 2.3 Heartbeat
Roto Fab
Solo Performance Cat deletes and Axleback
Hurst short shifter
#'s coming soon

Riaction coilovers
1LE sway bars
BMR mm
BMR chassis brace

Flow one 19" wheels wrapped in Mickey Thompsons


02 Z28 M6 35th anniversary
80k miles
T-tops
Leather
Bolt ons
Joy to drive this classic every day!
Daily Driver
asthmamax11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2018, 03:53 PM   #55
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by asthmamax11 View Post
Ted
Can this car consistently make those #'s without a significant cool down ?
All runs on my dyno are fully warmed up ECT IAT and Oil temps.

Can you be more specific with your question?

In what setting?
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 37 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2018, 10:51 PM   #56
Drsagacity

 
Drsagacity's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS Nightfall Gray vert
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Swansea, IL
Posts: 1,219
Ted, we have exchanged some messages and I love these threads. I appreciate all of the great info you are sharing.

So, upgrading the fuel system with LT4 components and add a cam. Why wouldn’t that also be the time to add drop in pistons/rods? I am shocked that when getting inside the motor more people wouldn’t spend the extra $1000 for drop in pistons. What am I missing?
Drsagacity is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.