TT V6 - Page 2 - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

CamaroBAMF28 · 03-29-2010, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TJ91

Well then lets get the "Leno" treatment

i agree!!!

Thrillz · 05-15-2010, 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TJ91

I see your point...yeah i dont know

. Well hopefully it would be priced lower then the base SS.
I wouldnt pay 4k over my 2LT/RS for it thats for sure.
I think he was thinking that if it replaces the LLT all together.
If it came standerd on 1LT or 2LT models only im sure majority of people would spring for it

Man i would be so pissed off if that happened.

ROD1 · 05-15-2010, 05:19 PM

My idea was to get the 6 with a SC and have all the joys of modern techno and more HP than the VB at about the same price. Cept been waitin for a year so far.

nachocheese · 05-16-2010, 10:03 PM

I don't think we will be seeing a TT LLT from GM. They will more likely come with a smaller V6 with turbo making about the same HP as the LLT and better mileage. SS will be smaller V8 with DI and Z28 will still have the bigger V8 with the SC. I wouldn't hold your breath on TT or SC from the aftermarket guys. I am sure someone will get one running, but it will probably be neither reliable or cost effective for most people.

stand-al0ne · 05-17-2010, 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nachocheese

I don't think we will be seeing a TT LLT from GM. They will more likely come with a smaller V6 with turbo making about the same HP as the LLT and better mileage. SS will be smaller V8 with DI and Z28 will still have the bigger V8 with the SC. I wouldn't hold your breath on TT or SC from the aftermarket guys. I am sure someone will get one running, but it will probably be neither reliable or cost effective for most people.

debbie downer

*The_Blur* · 05-17-2010, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nachocheese

I don't think we will be seeing a TT LLT from GM. They will more likely come with a smaller V6 with turbo making about the same HP as the LLT and better mileage. SS will be smaller V8 with DI and Z28 will still have the bigger V8 with the SC. I wouldn't hold your breath on TT or SC from the aftermarket guys. I am sure someone will get one running, but it will probably be neither reliable or cost effective for most people.

The one in discussion is a 3.0L, not the 3.6L we have right now.

Cost effective is a matter of opinion. For many buyers, a high-performance aftermarket kit is better for our wallets. We don't have to pay as much for gas, insurance, or financing at the time of purchase because we bought the V6 right away. That savings can go to aftermarket parts. Even after installing those parts, we don't have to pay as much for the car or the insurance, even if fuel cost goes up. We can trap higher speeds with less overall investment in the long run.

Try doing the math this way. Add up how much gas a V8 will take after 10 years. Add the extra cost of insurance and finance charges for a larger loan.

Using the same money down and time of ownership, 10 years, compare the V6. Until the installation of aftermarket parts, the V6 costs less for fuel. Even after that time, the insurance is based on the sale price of the car, meaning that V6 owners will pay less than V8 owners.

SDCamaro10 · 05-17-2010, 03:21 PM

Im not going to hold my breathe on any usable, reliable FI for the V6 to come out any time soon.

*The_Blur* · 05-17-2010, 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SDCamaro10

Im not going to hold my breathe on any usable, reliable FI for the V6 to come out any time soon.

I don't see why not.

A viable FI 4-cylinder powerhouse is in the Cobalt SS. The same could be done with 2 more cylinders.

nachocheese · 05-17-2010, 08:04 PM

I'm no gearhead, but the LLT is not just a Cobalt engine with 2 more cylinders. The engines are completely different.

esfkotaro · 05-18-2010, 02:05 AM

not terribly different in design overall, really, but there are a couple very significant differences:
designed with a turbo application in mind from the start
9.2:1 compression, as opposed to our 11.4:1
An ECU designed for a boosted application, compared to our all-but-completely locked-out, NA-intended, less understood ECU

SDCamaro10 · 05-18-2010, 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The_Blur

I don't see why not.

A viable FI 4-cylinder powerhouse is in the Cobalt SS. The same could be done with 2 more cylinders.

Im not saying that it wont happen, i just dont think it is going to happen in the next few months. Unless someone goes up to michigan and donates a car? lol.

Rdditten · 05-18-2010, 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SDCamaro10

Im not going to hold my breathe on any usable, reliable FI for the V6 to come out any time soon.

Hey SD, can you tell me how you did that engine cover? Any close up pictures? I like the look, Wonder if I can get that in Aqua Blue?

05-17-2010, 03:21 PM	#21
SDCamaro10 Drives: 2010 Camaro 1LT RJT Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 1,951	Im not going to hold my breathe on any usable, reliable FI for the V6 to come out any time soon. __________________

05-18-2010, 02:05 AM	#24
esfkotaro Drives: 2010 Camaro LS M6, Black with CGM Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: NJ Posts: 93	not terribly different in design overall, really, but there are a couple very significant differences: designed with a turbo application in mind from the start 9.2:1 compression, as opposed to our 11.4:1 An ECU designed for a boosted application, compared to our all-but-completely locked-out, NA-intended, less understood ECU __________________ 2010 Camaro LS M6, Black with CGM Stripes MRTv2 :: Injen CAI Factory Spoiler Added Coming soon (end of summer, hopefully): JBA Shorties :: Hurst or MTI Shifter (undecided) New 20" Wheels (undecided) :: Fogs :: GFX :: CF Heat Extractor hood :: Painted-On CGM Stripes :: G-2 Painted Calipers :: Painted Bowties

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
OK...I'm starting a better V6 exhaust examples thread!!	KMPrenger	Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons	611	07-01-2020 08:49 AM
V6 Camaro Performance Upgrades	rtcat600man	Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons	387	09-19-2019 06:53 PM
GROUP BUY- Mach XL V6 (Manual) and Mach XLT V6 (Automatic)- Ends 11/30/09	GOINGSOLO2	V6 Bolt-Ons & Tunes	252	10-20-2011 08:33 PM
Solo Performance V6 Mach-XL (Manual) and Mach-XLT (Auto) Exhaust Kits	GOINGSOLO2	V6 Bolt-Ons & Tunes	13	07-13-2010 01:28 PM
Solo Performance V6 Mach-XL (Manual) and Mach-XLT (Auto) Exhaust Kits	GOINGSOLO2	Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons	4	12-03-2009 01:59 PM

05-15-2010, 05:19 PM	#17
ROD1 Retired Drives: 2010 Camaro RS V6 #1301 DOB 3/23/09 Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Ithaca NY Posts: 2,563	My idea was to get the 6 with a SC and have all the joys of modern techno and more HP than the VB at about the same price. Cept been waitin for a year so far.

05-16-2010, 10:03 PM	#18
nachocheese Drives: 1LT RS, SIM Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Columbia, SC Posts: 288	I don't think we will be seeing a TT LLT from GM. They will more likely come with a smaller V6 with turbo making about the same HP as the LLT and better mileage. SS will be smaller V8 with DI and Z28 will still have the bigger V8 with the SC. I wouldn't hold your breath on TT or SC from the aftermarket guys. I am sure someone will get one running, but it will probably be neither reliable or cost effective for most people.

05-17-2010, 08:04 PM	#23
nachocheese Drives: 1LT RS, SIM Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Columbia, SC Posts: 288	I'm no gearhead, but the LLT is not just a Cobalt engine with 2 more cylinders. The engines are completely different.