11-06-2016, 09:45 AM | #1 |
Drives: 2015 black Z/28 Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,077
|
Tesla license plate led to some research
Disclaimer: I understand that I drive a gas guzzler and this not an attempt to refute the fact that Co2 emissions are harmful nor is this intended to be a rip job on electric cars. However, facts are facts and electric cars aren't as eco friendly as most believe them to be. We often leap to conclusions without all of the facts. Case in point...many believe wind turbines are eco friendly, but most do not know that nearly 600K birds and nearly 1 million bats are killed by them each year in the US alone. I'm not railing on wind turbines... just the fact that most do not know all of the facts.
My quest to become a bit more educated began the other day when I saw a guy in a Tesla drove with a license plate that read NO OPEC. He was obviously proud of himself for helping rid our streets of gas guzzlers, thus reducing our dependency on foreign oil imports. Additionally, I'd bet that he most likely believes his Tesla is much more eco friendly than our gas guzzling Z/28s. Sure, on the street an electric car does emit zero Co2. However, the total manufacturing process (known as "well to wheel") paints a much different picture. Below is an excerpt from this link https://www.wired.com/2016/03/teslas...t-green-think/. To be fair, the story goes on to say that, in the end, electric cars are more eco friendly. The question they don't answer is by how much? Then, you have all of the batteries (Tesla batteries weigh over half a ton) that must be disposed of (or recycled). And, the environmental hazards of mining for all the precious metals that are used in batteries. "Rare metals only exist in tiny quantities and inconvenient places—so you have to move a lot of earth to get just a little bit. In the Jiangxi rare earth mine in China, Abraham writes, workers dig eight-foot holes and pour ammonium sulfate into them to dissolve the sandy clay. Then they haul out bags of muck and pass it through several acid baths; what’s left is baked in a kiln, leaving behind the rare earths required by everything from our phones to our Teslas. At this mine, those rare earths amounted to 0.2 percent of what gets pulled out of the ground. The other 99.8 percent—now contaminated with toxic chemicals—is dumped back into the environment. That damage is difficult to quantify, just like the impact of oil drilling. And, as in every stage of the process, mining has hidden emissions. Jiangxi has it relatively easy because it’s digging up clay, but many mines rely on rock-crushing equipment with astronomical energy bills, as well as coal-fired furnaces for the final baking stages. Those spew a lot of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere in the process of refining a material destined for your zero-emissions car" Our cars will be dinosaurs one day. I just hope we aren't robbing Peter to pay Paul!
__________________
Last edited by JUSTIFIED; 11-06-2016 at 01:08 PM. |
11-06-2016, 09:50 AM | #2 |
Drives: 2015 Z/28 #397 2022 ZL1 #1799 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: DC
Posts: 521
|
Agreed, all it does is shift the pollution from one area to another, there is "no free lunch"
|
11-06-2016, 03:30 PM | #3 |
Drives: . Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: .
Posts: 589
|
Nothing new. The full carbon footprint to build and assemble a Prius has always been more than most conventional cars.
|
11-06-2016, 04:56 PM | #4 |
|
I do have to point out that your fact about bird kills due to wind turbines is only partially correct. More birds die per year in the United States flying into windows then due to wind turbines; 988k. Wind turbines might kill around 33k birds per year. However, due to recent advancements in design and technology this number will plummet.
One meta-analysis actually documented the amount of birds killed per year due to different sources of energy by using other studies. However, each study used a different methodology to come up with their numbers. Sorry, environmental engineer here that is a big supporter of wind energy giving some insight on the topic. On another note, petroleum is a cleaner energy source than coal. So your z/28 is more 'eco-friendly' depending on the energy source the electric vehicle uses.......in the US it is predominately generated by coal.
__________________
Instagram @orange_maro_
|
11-06-2016, 05:39 PM | #5 | |
Drives: 2015 black Z/28 Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,077
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
11-06-2016, 05:52 PM | #6 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Instagram @orange_maro_
|
|
11-12-2016, 09:51 AM | #7 | |
Raging Bull Reborn
Drives: '09 CGM Z063LZ '15 RH Z/28 #0631 Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Broken Arrow OK
Posts: 765
|
Quote:
__________________
Toy 1 '15 RH Z/28 w/AC & Radio S/N 0631 Toy 2 '09 CGM Z06 3LZ My DD: '17 Ford Mustang GT Her DD: '14 F150 Ecoboost 3.5 |
|
11-29-2016, 10:25 PM | #8 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Instagram @orange_maro_
|
|
12-04-2016, 06:42 PM | #9 |
Drives: 2015 black Z/28 Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,077
|
I started this whole thing... sorry... I wasn't trying to say we should not use wind turbine tech. I was just pointing out that the Tesla guy prob has no clue about eco impact (not just birds...) of alternative energy sources. Now, if we could just keep the Chinese from stealing the wind turbine SW patents...
__________________
|
12-08-2016, 11:51 PM | #10 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Instagram @orange_maro_
|
|
12-09-2016, 09:44 AM | #11 |
Drives: 14 Z/28 0# Join Date: May 2013
Location: NY
Posts: 773
|
+1 if you count the shipping on actual ships for components for this car it is staggering.
__________________
"PTM11" Search & Destroy
|
|
|
|
|