Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 6th gen Camaro vs...


Bigwormgraphix


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-30-2017, 03:11 PM   #1107
islander033
SLOBRA1
 
islander033's Avatar
 
Drives: GT500/Cruze/DMax/Cobra
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Alberta
Posts: 595
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilsReject97 View Post
They won one lap, after that, they lost...

In fact, it was so bad after the first lap, that it was no longer a contest.

http://www.motortrend.com/cars/chevr...-shelby-gt500/

I'll agree with you, if its just one lap, the GT 500 won it easily...but on a road course, it's generally not one lap....

Oh and....the ZL1 still beat the GT500 around the Ring..oh wait, Ford wasn't stupid enough to run the car around it....
Had 2 faster laps and was still ahead on 3rd lap. That’s a win with anyone’s math.

Are you sure about your ring story? Lol
Attached Images
 
__________________
2010 GT500 Best ET=10.10 - Best Trap=143.59mph
2003 Turbo Cobra Best ET=8.27 - Best Trap=166.42mph
islander033 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2017, 03:14 PM   #1108
13vertss

 
13vertss's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro convertible 2SS/RS
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Southern NH
Posts: 1,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by islander033 View Post
The laps got slightly slower on the one mag test....but all were still faster than the ZL1. So there is that.

Inch or a mile, winning a race is still winning.
You may want to go and re-read that article. Also, one lap isn’t a race.
13vertss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2017, 03:19 PM   #1109
islander033
SLOBRA1
 
islander033's Avatar
 
Drives: GT500/Cruze/DMax/Cobra
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Alberta
Posts: 595
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13vertss/r's View Post
You may want to go and re-read that article. Also, one lap isn’t a race.
Multiple laps and was ahead at the end.

Do the math...
__________________
2010 GT500 Best ET=10.10 - Best Trap=143.59mph
2003 Turbo Cobra Best ET=8.27 - Best Trap=166.42mph
islander033 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2017, 03:28 PM   #1110
13vertss

 
13vertss's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro convertible 2SS/RS
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Southern NH
Posts: 1,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by islander033 View Post
Multiple laps and was ahead at the end.

Do the math...
Right from article.



The Mustang laid down the faster lap solely by virtue of its 82-horsepower, 75-lb-ft advantage in a drag race up the front straight to the finish line. The result: Shelby, 1:38.69; ZL1, 1:39.18.

But wait, there’s a catch. You see, Randy had another observation about the Shelby. “The brakes just don’t generate confidence. They’re not enough to stop this car on a racetrack. On the street, they’re probably fine. But the Camaro brakes do stop the car.”

While the Mustang was a half-second faster around the track than the ZL1 on its best lap, it couldn’t repeat the performance. By the end of the first lap, the brakes had already begun to heat up so badly, we could smell them from the pits as the car passed by on the front straight. By the end of the second lap, the Shelby had lost more than half of its advantage over the ZL1, turning a 1:39.03. By the third lap, the Mustang was behind the Camaro, turning a 1:39.30. The ZL1, meanwhile, never deviated by more than two-tenths of a second.

The problem, we suspect, is cooling. The Mustang is 234 pounds lighter than the Camaro and has larger front brakes, and while it has more power and more speed to deal with, it should stop better. In a single attempt, it does, stopping from 60 mph 7 feet shorter than the Camaro. At the track, though, Randy complained of serious fade. “Brakes lack bite, worse each lap,” he noted. “Feels like it doesn’t want to stop. Disconcerting.” We took a look under the cars, and where the Camaro had obvious ductwork to provide cool air to the front brakes, the Mustang had none.

So, yes, the Mustang turned a faster lap, but if it’s not repeatable, is it really a win? Find a 2.23-mile autocross and you might have something, but in any road race, the Mustang is going to quickly fall behind.
13vertss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2017, 03:32 PM   #1111
islander033
SLOBRA1
 
islander033's Avatar
 
Drives: GT500/Cruze/DMax/Cobra
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Alberta
Posts: 595
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13vertss/r's View Post
Right from article.



The Mustang laid down the faster lap solely by virtue of its 82-horsepower, 75-lb-ft advantage in a drag race up the front straight to the finish line. The result: Shelby, 1:38.69; ZL1, 1:39.18.

But wait, there’s a catch. You see, Randy had another observation about the Shelby. “The brakes just don’t generate confidence. They’re not enough to stop this car on a racetrack. On the street, they’re probably fine. But the Camaro brakes do stop the car.”

While the Mustang was a half-second faster around the track than the ZL1 on its best lap, it couldn’t repeat the performance. By the end of the first lap, the brakes had already begun to heat up so badly, we could smell them from the pits as the car passed by on the front straight. By the end of the second lap, the Shelby had lost more than half of its advantage over the ZL1, turning a 1:39.03. By the third lap, the Mustang was behind the Camaro, turning a 1:39.30. The ZL1, meanwhile, never deviated by more than two-tenths of a second.

The problem, we suspect, is cooling. The Mustang is 234 pounds lighter than the Camaro and has larger front brakes, and while it has more power and more speed to deal with, it should stop better. In a single attempt, it does, stopping from 60 mph 7 feet shorter than the Camaro. At the track, though, Randy complained of serious fade. “Brakes lack bite, worse each lap,” he noted. “Feels like it doesn’t want to stop. Disconcerting.” We took a look under the cars, and where the Camaro had obvious ductwork to provide cool air to the front brakes, the Mustang had none.

So, yes, the Mustang turned a faster lap, but if it’s not repeatable, is it really a win? Find a 2.23-mile autocross and you might have something, but in any road race, the Mustang is going to quickly fall behind.
So do the math on those 3 laps that were run.

Go ahead and assume that the ZL1 did it's best lap of 1.39.18 every time...which it didn't.

PS. Don't forget to carry the 1.
__________________
2010 GT500 Best ET=10.10 - Best Trap=143.59mph
2003 Turbo Cobra Best ET=8.27 - Best Trap=166.42mph
islander033 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2017, 03:54 PM   #1112
13vertss

 
13vertss's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro convertible 2SS/RS
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Southern NH
Posts: 1,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by islander033 View Post
So do the math on those 3 laps that were run.

Go ahead and assume that the ZL1 did it's best lap of 1.39.18 every time...which it didn't.

PS. Don't forget to carry the 1.
I put things in Bold so you can understand.
13vertss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2017, 04:04 PM   #1113
Chadicus

 
Drives: 2017 2SS M6
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Billings MT
Posts: 773
Quote:
Originally Posted by islander033 View Post
So do the math on those 3 laps that were run.

Go ahead and assume that the ZL1 did it's best lap of 1.39.18 every time...which it didn't.

PS. Don't forget to carry the 1.
The funny thing is the base SS is just about as fast as the 5th gen ZL1. The new GT 500 has to be an all around performer or people will be disappointed in it. Unless it can best a Demon on the strip, it will have to be competitive around a track like a ZL1 is.

Maybe there will be a 500 and 500R. Whatever they throw in the ring has to be a top performer. Can't afford not to have coolers this time.
Chadicus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2017, 04:43 PM   #1114
FastCarFanBoy
Banned
 
Drives: 2013 GB GT
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilsReject97 View Post
car mods:
Drag Pack, Tune/e85, x-pipe exhaust, stock air box, 315 gears, stock stall, 10 speed auto

The car is far from stock...and at least the guy was specifying that this was only a 301a car with no PP...
who claimed it was stock? it had Drag pak, tune, pulled air filter and resonator replaced with an X. you make it sound like it's FBO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilsReject97 View Post
They won one lap, after that, they lost...

In fact, it was so bad after the first lap, that it was no longer a contest.

http://www.motortrend.com/cars/chevr...-shelby-gt500/

I'll agree with you, if its just one lap, the GT 500 won it easily...but on a road course, it's generally not one lap....

Oh and....the ZL1 still beat the GT500 around the Ring..oh wait, Ford wasn't stupid enough to run the car around it....
It was faster for 2 laps and would be ahead for the 3rd lap. After 3 laps the ZL1 would take the lead for good
FastCarFanBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2017, 05:00 PM   #1115
DevilsReject97
Nightmare
 
DevilsReject97's Avatar
 
Drives: Your mom crazy in bed
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Naptown
Posts: 2,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by FastCarFanBoy View Post
who claimed it was stock? it had Drag pak, tune, pulled air filter and resonator replaced with an X. you make it sound like it's FBO.

It was faster for 2 laps and would be ahead for the 3rd lap. After 3 laps the ZL1 would take the lead for good
Because the whole point of this conversation was keeping stock vs. stock....or at worst case, a tune/tires...

However, it was far more than that....

And again, as Blaq has repeatedly said, this is all being done in the winter, when every car will be great on a well prepped track. Do this in the dead heat of drag racing season and you will NOT replicate those numbers.... not even close..

As for the MT article, my whole point was that after 1 lap, the car was pretty much hosed....
__________________
DevilsReject97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2017, 05:12 PM   #1116
BlaqWhole
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by FastCarFanBoy View Post
who claimed it was stock? it had Drag pak, tune, pulled air filter and resonator replaced with an X. you make it sound like it's FBO.

It was faster for 2 laps and would be ahead for the 3rd lap. After 3 laps the ZL1 would take the lead for good
It fell behind the ZL1 on the third lap. So it was faster for 2 laps and slower on the third...not after the third.

The GT500 clearly was faster. It took 2 out of 3 laps which is impressive. But, it is a GT500. It is always going to either put up a good fight or win against the Camaros. This time around Ford has had a good amount of time to bring something out to beat the ZL1. So I suspect it will and I won't be surprised if it does. I will be very disappointed if it doesn't. So basically all eyes are on Ford right now. They really have to deliver and deliver good. The only thing I could see raining on the parade is if GM pulls a sneak move and ups the ZL1 for 2019. I don't think they will tho. We will have a fight on our hands.
BlaqWhole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2017, 05:21 PM   #1117
FastCarFanBoy
Banned
 
Drives: 2013 GB GT
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilsReject97 View Post
Because the whole point of this conversation was keeping stock vs. stock....or at worst case, a tune/tires...

However, it was far more than that....

And again, as Blaq has repeatedly said, this is all being done in the winter, when every car will be great on a well prepped track. Do this in the dead heat of drag racing season and you will NOT replicate those numbers.... not even close...
the point of the conversation was that Blaq said he doubted the 11.3 could be duplicated which is why I posted the video of the 11.26 car...the 11.3x car was drag pak and tune also.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole View Post
It fell behind the ZL1 on the third lap. So it was faster for 2 laps and slower on the third...not after the third.
yes, in a 3 lap race the gt500 would win, 4 laps it would lose.
FastCarFanBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2017, 05:27 PM   #1118
DevilsReject97
Nightmare
 
DevilsReject97's Avatar
 
Drives: Your mom crazy in bed
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Naptown
Posts: 2,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by FastCarFanBoy View Post

yes, in a 3 lap race the gt500 would win, 4 laps it would lose.
In a 3 lap race, it LOST. It won the first two laps, but lost the 3rd...

Additionally, this is a pro driver putting up top notch times. The cars were still close enough where one mistake, one slightly bad brake, and boom... the ZL1 was ahead...
__________________
DevilsReject97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2017, 06:19 PM   #1119
mlee
CamaroFans.com
 
mlee's Avatar
 
Drives: ZLE & ZR2
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 37,505
I wonder if these cars had stock brake fluid in them. If so I don't think either of them would have lasted many more laps.
__________________
mlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2017, 06:37 PM   #1120
Zeke.Malvo

 
Zeke.Malvo's Avatar
 
Drives: 1969 Mustang MaCh1
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SJ
Posts: 835
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilsReject97 View Post
In a 3 lap race, it LOST. It won the first two laps, but lost the 3rd...

Additionally, this is a pro driver putting up top notch times. The cars were still close enough where one mistake, one slightly bad brake, and boom... the ZL1 was ahead...
It WON after three laps. The GT500 was .51 ahead after the first lap. It was up by about .75 after 2 laps. On the 3rd lap, it was .1 seconds behind the ZL1 time, meaning Ilit was still ~.6 seconds ahead. At that pace, it would probably take another 3 laps or so before it would get over taken by the ZL1.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
__________________
1969 Pro-Touring MaCh 1 - CHP 427w 10.8 comp - 3140 lbs. - 460 rwhp / 490 rwtq
T56 Magnum || 14" 6 piston front / 13" 4 piston rear Wilwood brakes || Hydraulic clutch || 9" Detroit Locker || TCP Coilovers || Forgeline Wheels 18x10 275/35 front, 19x12 325/30 rear
Zeke.Malvo is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.